The Michigan Messenger

Top Stories

The Michigan Messenger going forward

By Staff Report | 11.16.11

I am writing today to announce the closure of the Michigan Messenger. After four years of operation in Michigan, the board of the American Independent News Network, has decided to shift publication of its news into a single site, The American Independent at Americanindependent.com. This is part of a shift in strategy, towards new forms [...]

Colorado-based abstinence program provided false and misleading information to Michigan students

HIV-AIDS-small
By Todd A. Heywood | 11.16.11

An abstinence-only presentation provided to numerous school districts in Calhoun and Eaton Counties in October of this year provided false and misleading information to students about HIV, experts allege.

Class action lawsuit filed against MERS over unpaid taxes

foreclosure
By Todd A. Heywood | 11.15.11

Two county registers of deeds filed a class action lawsuit Monday on behalf of Michigan’s 83 counties alleging that the Mortgage Electronic Registration Services owes millions of dollars in property title transfer taxes.

Schuette fights important mercury regulations

epa_logo
By Eartha Jane Melzer | 11.14.11

Despite evidence of the impact of mercury on children and public health, Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette last month joined with 24 other state attorneys general in filing a lawsuit to scuttle new EPA regulations that would reduce mercury emissions from power plants.

800px-Bombeta_de_Llum
 

McMillin bill would let Michigan make inefficient light bulbs

By Eartha Jane Melzer | 09.13.11 | 12:56 pm

Rep. Tom McMillin (R-Rochester Hills) has introduced a bill that would allow Michigan firms to manufacture incandescent light bulbs despite a federal ban. The bill states:
 

An incandescent lightbulb that is manufactured in this state without the inclusion of parts, other than generic or insignificant parts, imported from outside of this state and that remains within this state has not entered into interstate commerce and is not subject to congressional authority to regulate interstate commerce.

Michigan Environmental Council Policy Director James Clift told an online environmental forum that the bill “would clearly demonstrate to the rest of the country how short term some of our elected officials are in their thinking and their inability to grasp the concept of progress.”

Under federal law incandescent bulbs are to be phased out beginning next year.

In testimony to the House Energy and Commerce Committee on Monday, Michigan Sierra Club organizer Mike Berkowitz called the bill “wholly misguided.”

“Discontinued use of inefficient light bulbs is important in order to decrease energy and health costs for citizens, decrease pollution caused by dirty energy sources, and decrease the money spent by the state to clean up pollution,” Berkowitz said. “Once it is fully implemented, the Energy Independence and Security Act is projected to save Americans over $12.5 billion in energy costs every year, save Michiganders over $350 million every year, and save each Michigan household $85 per year …”

Comments

  • Anonymous

    Awesome, McMillin can follow up with a bill giving tax credits to industries that want to start making 8-track tapes, beta-max, and Crystal Pepsi in the state too, because that’s real job creation!

  • CB

    I guess this is one way for a less than bright politician to obtain publicity. Feed on the anger of the laid off worker who is looking to blame someone, anyone for their plight and make a target of a law meant to save money and energy for decades to come.

  • Charles Armentrout

    Fluorescent lighting is a bumper sticker green issue that is hard to speak against. There are, however, issues that make these bulbs and tubes much less than promised. One big one is the shoddy Chinese manufacturing that reduces lifetime, thereby increasing cost and messing with efficiency ratings. My longer discussion: http://lasttechage.wordpress.com/2011/08/17/using-fluorescents-a-compilation/. Plants in Michigan for incandescent bulbs may or may not make better bulbs, but consumers will not have to wade through nearly impenetrable rhetoric.

    • Anonymous

      CA you are right! Not to mention, in case you break an incandescent light bulb, you don’t need HAZMET to clean up the heavy metal known as mercury, of which even trace amounts can cause irreversable nerve damage and neurological disorders. Oh don’t forget the fees. They won’t clean up the mecury for free either. Energy saving wormlike bulbs are a farce.

      • Anonymous

        Fear Appeal – Fear Appeal – Mercury will kill you! WMD’s! Look out for the Gays! Do you know how hard it is to break the newest compact flourescent bulbs?

        • Anonymous



          How can you identify a moron?

          First, a moron can’t think for themselves and often mock those who are smarter then they are! Second, they often mimic exactly what they perceive to be a popular opinion, when it is not! Third, in order to throw off their opponent, they most likely will spew nonsense that is not relative to any subject matter! Fourth, they often repeat themselves! Fifth, they are almost always wrong!

          Okay Toka, let’s see how you measure up against a moron.

          First, you suggest (twice) that I am basically a fear monger(er). Wrong! I merely pointed out some facts! Second, you implied that I believe “compact flourescent bulbs” are weapons of mass destruction. Wrong again! No- CFL’s are not WMD’s, they are light bulbs! Third, your mind reading technique isn’t working, because you thought that I would warn people to “Look out for gays”. You are wrong again! Hey, that’s 3 strikes and I think you are out BUCKO! The proof is in the pudding, I guess you are a moron!

          Okay, I’ll give you another chance to redeem yourself.

          You said, quote “Do you know how hard it is to break the newest compact flourescent bulbs?” My answer is, “No I don’t”. But how would you know? Only a moron would try to break a mercury filled bulb! And if you didn’t break the bulb, then you are still a moron for making such a dumb comment like that! That’s strikes 4 and 5. You aren’t doing so good pal!

          Okay . . . I’m just pulling your leg- let’s pretend that you are not a moron. Instead let’s just say you are under-educated! And what I mean by that is this- if you don’t know any better, then I can’t chastise you for being ignorant, especially if you were never taught how to study, research or analyze anything beyond that booger stuck on your finger.

          Listen up and learn- because according to the Los Angeles Times, some studies show that only 2% of the CFL’s are ever recycled. That means that 98% of the CFL’s are believed to end up where . . . in the landfill. To help with with the decomposition process, a 10 ton tractor endlessly drives over the garbage heap and moves trash from here to there all day long, thus breaking the CFL’s and releasing the heavy metal toxins into the environment.

          When it rains the heavy metal elements leech into the local lakes, rivers, streams and the underground water table as well as the land. This may be a small problem now, but in 20 years it will become a much bigger problem if it continues to contaminate our land and water supply. The savings we gain now will be short lived. The cost to cleanup the environment later will most likely be far beyond what we can save today. Any moron can figure that out, don’t you think!

          Toka, you go ahead and stock up on the high tech CFL’s, I’ll just keep my incandescent bulbs until they come out with something safer or until the Green Police say I can’t use them anymore.


          Now go learn something and Google these titles so you understand the hazards of CFL’s:


          LA Times:
          Unrecycled New Light Bulbs Release Mercury into the Environment

          Scientific American:
          Are Compact Fluorescent Lightbulbs Dangerous?

          World Net Daily:Consumers in Dark Over Risks of New Light Bulbs


          – John

          • Anonymous

            I can’t believe you would stoop to namecalling when all I was trying to do was speak right wing-an-ese. lol..

            I very much understand the hazards of CFL’s. The fact that they aren’t being recycled is because of obstruction tactics by folks like McMillin who would rather use dated technology instead of raise awareness. I would be very much in favor of a law that would fine people for not recycling their CFL’s. Speaking of mercury though, obviously those glass thermometers that I was raised with when I was sick are killers too, after all they’re even more fragile and can deposit mercury straight into your mouth. How come the right wing is all for personal responsibility except when it comes to doing things like using CFL’s? Then they want to stop them from widespread use because they’re dangerous? Since when did the right wing care about the welfare of the water table (Fracking) about the health of people (Health Care)? You’re doing exactly what the dirty industry wants you to do, singing their praises for their profit while shooting your own interests in the foot.

            Now, something safer is already out, they’re called LED’s. But I will bet dollars to doughnuts you won’t be stocking up on those.

            Additionally, you show me the statistics on CFL related injury/death, instead of the fear appeals in places like World Net Daily and we can talk. Because if you google Coal-related deaths, you’ll come up with quite a hefty number. The lives saved through energy conservation will trump the lives lost through a Darwin award when somebody cracks open the ceramic portion of the bulb and licks the inside of it.

          • Anonymous

            John. Hi again 🙂 When it comes to research…the LA Times and World Net Daily are not reliable sources. They are journalists, at best. You, of all people that like to analyze and study, should know that. Chose your sources wisely or people will not respect your viewpoint. Just observing your response to the other poster…”especially if you were never taught how to study, research or analyze anything beyond that booger stuck on your finger. “

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_QXYBDLYOUFQLNNZZ6CEA5TH4YI Peekaboo

    Well, that certainly makes sense John. Great facts on the hazards! The sites you recommended were very insightful!

  • Anonymous

    All this CFL garbage adds up to too much government intervention into my life. Stop with the regulations already! I have done the research and won’t have a cfl bulb inside my house. I’m all for saving energy, but there are other ways to do it. Get the government out of my life and my lightbulbs! Next they will be mandating that I must buy an electric car. The reality is, where do they think the electricity comes from to run the car? Actually, it is a coal-powered or nuke-powered car. Doesn’t that make you feel all green now?