Abstinence-only education cartoon by Mikhaela B. Reid (www.mikhaela.net
LANSING — Nine grants from the state of Michigan totaling $1.4 million for abstinence-only education are drawing fire from health advocates and gay rights leaders because they say the grants exclude messages for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) people.
Specifically, the granting rules mandate that abstinence be defined as no sex before marriage, and they define a mutually monogamous relationship in the context of marriage as the “expected standard of human sexuality.”
The grants to nine community organizations were announced at the beginning of January by the Michigan Department of Community Health.
“I think it is pretty clear from the research that it (abstinence-only education) endangers all youth. It fails them all. They do not mention anything about LGBT,” said Bernadette Brown, director of policy for the Detroit-based Triangle Foundation, which lobbies the state for LGBT-inclusive legislation and monitors hate crimes against the LGBT community.
The state counters that the grants are not its only efforts to address unwanted teen pregnancies and sexually transmitted infections. James McCurtis, spokesman for the Michigan Department of Community Health, said the state spends an additional $700,000, half the amount devoted to abstinence education, on other programs.
The abstinence-only funding comes from the federal government. Michigan is one of 25 states that continue to apply for and accept that money, while 25 other states have declined to pursue that money, citing research showing that abstinence-only education does not work.
Recent studies have found that abstinence-only programs do not delay the onset of sexual activity by teen-agers and that youth who take chastity pledges and take part in abstinence-only education are less likely to take measures to protect themselves from unwanted pregnancies or sexually transmitted infections.
McCurtis said Michigan continues to pursue these funds “because these community groups are following the federal guidelines, and they are doing a good job running the program.”
He added that the program is not discriminatory against LGBT youth because its student-participants are too young to marry.
“The program is for 11 to 18 year olds,” he said in an e-mail. “I said this before. This age group cannot get married. The program talks about abstinence.”
Under state law, youth aged 16 to 18 can get married with parental consent, and youth under 16 can get married if they have parental and probate court consent. Any Michigan resident can get married at 18, so long as he or she is marrying a person of the opposite gender who is 18 or older or has met the consent conditions above.
Brown of the Triangle Foundation pointed to a 2007 Canadian study that found that lesbian and bisexual teen-agers were seven times more likely to have an unwanted pregnancy or to get a sexually transmitted infection than their straight counterparts.
“This is huge, and it is of great concern,” said Brown.
Lori Lammerand, CEO of Planned Parenthood of Mid and South Michigan, said the messages of abstinence-only education are not going to resonate with LGBT youth.
“If I happen to be some one who identifies as LGBT, I m not going to listen to the message,” she said. “Marriage is the only benchmark (for the abstinence-only programs).”