Since I am tired of explaining that to you (im sure you have never talked to Grover) I will pretend that Grover is a Republican.

One man has been listed out of 45% of the population. Do you suppose if that statement were true you might be able to think of one more…one perhaps that isn't questionable?

There you go, since you chose to miss it the first time.

As for your claim that Norquist is not a Republican:
– Reason magazine characterizes Norquist as a Republican strategist — and Norquist doesn't file objection anywhere;
– Norquist is a former executive director of the College Republicans (early 1980's);
– He was a Republican campaign staffer for the Republican Platform Committee during the late 1980's through the mid-1990's;
– Norquist is on the board of directors of the National Federation of Republican Assemblies;
– He's been president of the District of Columbia Republican Assembly, D.C.'s NFRA affiliate;
– He's also been president of the Advisory Board, Ronald Reagan Legacy Project (RRLP).

The reason why Norquist won't make a case out of his status as a Republican leader is that the tax-exempt status of his political organizations requires him to appear to be acting in a nonpartisan fashion. But a leopard doesn't change his spots; Norquist is still a Republican under all the legalese.

Perhaps Norquist might be asking whether you're a Republican if you can't recognize one of your party's leaders.

Maybe this is an informative if annoying exercise: perhaps if the Republican Party is now disavowing its leaders who've shaped their ideology over the last 20-plus years, they are now without ideology at all.

Comply with the comment policy if you wish to continue to comment at this site.

Since I am tired of explaining that to you (im sure you have never talked to Grover) I will pretend that Grover is a Republican.

One man has been listed out of 45% of the population. Do you suppose if that statement were true you might be able to think of one more…one perhaps that isn't questionable?

There you go, since you chose to miss it the first time.

As for your claim that Norquist is not a Republican:
– Reason magazine characterizes Norquist as a Republican strategist — and Norquist doesn't file objection anywhere;
– Norquist is a former executive director of the College Republicans (early 1980's);
– He was a Republican campaign staffer for the Republican Platform Committee during the late 1980's through the mid-1990's;
– Norquist is on the board of directors of the National Federation of Republican Assemblies;
– He's been president of the District of Columbia Republican Assembly, D.C.'s NFRA affiliate;
– He's also been president of the Advisory Board, Ronald Reagan Legacy Project (RRLP).

The reason why Norquist won't make a case out of his status as a Republican leader is that the tax-exempt status of his political organizations requires him to appear to be acting in a nonpartisan fashion. But a leopard doesn't change his spots; Norquist is still a Republican under all the legalese.

Perhaps Norquist might be asking whether you're a Republican if you can't recognize one of your party's leaders.

Maybe this is an informative if annoying exercise: perhaps if the Republican Party is now disavowing its leaders who've shaped their ideology over the last 20-plus years, they are now without ideology at all.

Comply with the comment policy if you wish to continue to comment at this site.

Since I am tired of explaining that to you (im sure you have never talked to Grover) I will pretend that Grover is a Republican.

One man has been listed out of 45% of the population. Do you suppose if that statement were true you might be able to think of one more…one perhaps that isn't questionable?

There you go, since you chose to miss it the first time.

As for your claim that Norquist is not a Republican:
– Reason magazine characterizes Norquist as a Republican strategist — and Norquist doesn't file objection anywhere;
– Norquist is a former executive director of the College Republicans (early 1980's);
– He was a Republican campaign staffer for the Republican Platform Committee during the late 1980's through the mid-1990's;
– Norquist is on the board of directors of the National Federation of Republican Assemblies;
– He's been president of the District of Columbia Republican Assembly, D.C.'s NFRA affiliate;
– He's also been president of the Advisory Board, Ronald Reagan Legacy Project (RRLP).

The reason why Norquist won't make a case out of his status as a Republican leader is that the tax-exempt status of his political organizations requires him to appear to be acting in a nonpartisan fashion. But a leopard doesn't change his spots; Norquist is still a Republican under all the legalese.

Perhaps Norquist might be asking whether you're a Republican if you can't recognize one of your party's leaders.

Maybe this is an informative if annoying exercise: perhaps if the Republican Party is now disavowing its leaders who've shaped their ideology over the last 20-plus years, they are now without ideology at all.

Comply with the comment policy if you wish to continue to comment at this site.