Top Stories

The Michigan Messenger going forward

By Staff Report | 11.16.11

I am writing today to announce the closure of the Michigan Messenger. After four years of operation in Michigan, the board of the American Independent News Network, has decided to shift publication of its news into a single site, The American Independent at Americanindependent.com. This is part of a shift in strategy, towards new forms [...]

Colorado-based abstinence program provided false and misleading information to Michigan students

HIV-AIDS-small
By Todd A. Heywood | 11.16.11

An abstinence-only presentation provided to numerous school districts in Calhoun and Eaton Counties in October of this year provided false and misleading information to students about HIV, experts allege.

Class action lawsuit filed against MERS over unpaid taxes

foreclosure
By Todd A. Heywood | 11.15.11

Two county registers of deeds filed a class action lawsuit Monday on behalf of Michigan’s 83 counties alleging that the Mortgage Electronic Registration Services owes millions of dollars in property title transfer taxes.

Schuette fights important mercury regulations

epa_logo
By Eartha Jane Melzer | 11.14.11

Despite evidence of the impact of mercury on children and public health, Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette last month joined with 24 other state attorneys general in filing a lawsuit to scuttle new EPA regulations that would reduce mercury emissions from power plants.

Election results have Republicans nationwide asking, “Who are we?” And Michigan is no different

By Todd A. Heywood | 11.11.08 | 8:09 am

It began in earnest on election night, as tallies rolled in and the Republican Party realized it had taken a beating locally and nationally. The party faithful started asking, “Where are going to go from here?”

That answer is reflected in a national dialogue happening at the newly minted rebuildtheparty.com. The new Web site, run by a coalition of GOP activists from around the country, is designed to start the following discussion:

2008 made one thing clear: if allowed to go unchecked, the Democrats’ structural advantages, including their use of the Internet, their more than 2-to-1 advantage with young voters, their discovery of a better grassroots model — will be as big a threat to the future of the GOP as the toxic political environment we have faced the last few years.

The time is now to set in motion the changes needed to rebuild our party from the grassroots up, modernize the way we run campaigns, and attract different, energetic, and younger candidates at all levels.

We must be conservative in philosophy — but bold in our approach. We don’t need a slight tweak here or there. We need transformation. We can’t keep fighting a 21st century war with 20th century weapons.

This is a document about bringing the Republican Party into the future — and it isn’t just about strategies and tactics.

Revitalizing the party will have much to do with how we talk about issues and standing on principle. And, above all, it will require leadership.

And the party in Michigan is also going through the growing pains as well, starting with the battle for the chairmanship of the Michigan Republican Party. Speculation abounds on the Internet that current Michigan GOP Chair Saul Anuzis is planning a run for the chair of the RNC. Joe Sylvester, a Bay City conservative Republican, secretary of the Bay County Republicans and publisher of the blog the Michigan Conservative Dossier, told Michigan Messenger, “According to the various articles I’ve read, it looks like Saul Anuzis is at least considering the prospect of running for RNC Chairman.”

Anuzis’ leaving for the national post could open a battle for the Michigan chair seat, and that battle appears to be starting.

Well-known Republican political consultant Chetly Zarko, on his Outsidelansing.com Web site, ran information about a robo-poll currently being conducted in the state. A robo-poll is a poll conducted over the phone with the use of a computer. It is unknown who is sponsoring the poll. The poll was being conducted Wednesday. From OutSideLansing.com:

If anyone has further details, please let us know, but this is the opening salvo in the battle over who replaces Saul Anuzis. Anuzis himself appears (according to Washington Post speculation, today) to be running for Republican Party National Chair – a position I believe he’d be qualified for and with the right philosophy, although the Michigan losses will be considered a weakness. I also believe it is time for Saul to make that step and move on, regardless, as freshness in leadership at this time would be good. Saul is clearly not the cause of the current chaos and would be well-positioned to bring the new online tools to the RNC, allowing a perfect opportunity for a different leadership style in Michigan.

Zarko goes on to list the names that are presented in the robo-poll:

1. Suzane Miller Allen, Traverse City, Sterling Corporation, wife of Jason
2. Glenn Clark, 9th, Michigan Christan Coalition
3. Craig DeRoche, Former MI House Speaker
4. Scott Greenlee, Kent County
5. Jack Hoogendyk
6. John Jamion? [Ed: Jamian]
7. Dan Toles (Toless)? [Ed: Tollis]
8. Jerry Zandstra, Pro-Life Federation, Brownback supporter

Blogger Sylvester explains who these GOP players are in an e-mail to Michigan Messenger. Glenn Clark is an early McCain supporter, chair of the 9th Congressional District and aligned with the Christian Conservatives, like Gary Glenn of the American Family Association. Suzane Miller Allen is married to State Sen. Jason Allen and has worked for Senate Majority leader Mike Bishop. Scott Greenlee was the deputy director of GOP Victory Centers in the state until his dismissal Oct. 4. He is aligned with MI-GOP power broker and former National Committeeman Chuck Yob and comes to the party from Kent County. Jerry Zandstra is part of the Pro-Life Federation and is closely aligned with Yob, even though the two had a “falling out.” Dan Tollis is a two-time state representative candidate from Macomb County and, according to Sylvester, appears to have “meaningful alliances” in the party. Tollis is rising into the race by criticizing the state party. Former Michigan House Speaker Craig DeRoche has also been mentioned, and Sylvester said he does not know who John Jamian is.

Another name that has surfaced as a possible replacement for Anuzis is Ingham County Republican Party Chairman Norm Shinkle. Shinkle is a former state representative and tax judge.

“He is very qualified to be state chair,” Sylvester said.

On Sunday, Republican state Rep. Jack Hoogendyk, a social conservative from the Kalamazoo area, sent a letter to supporters via e-mail announcing his plans to run for state chair. In the letter, subject-lined, ‘I am running for state party chair,’ he wrote:

The Republican Party in Michigan is hurting. Since I took office in January of 2003, we have lost 20 House seats, three Senate seats, two Congressmen, a Supreme Court Chief Justice, and countless township and county officials. We failed to regain the governor’s mansion in 2006 and we missed on US Senate seats in 2006 and 2008. We have consistently lost the debate in the battle of ideas.

It is time to make an evaluation of the situation and resolve to make some significant changes. There is no point in dwelling on personalities or looking back, what is important is that we right the ship before it sinks.

Hoogendyk then outlines his plan to make the MI-GOP functional again:

I would like to share with you some of the things I believe we need to do:

* We need to unify the party around the core principles that define who we are as Republicans. The Number One priority is reducing the size of government.

* We need to identify the key issues that identify Republicans and which will win at the ballot box.

* We need to begin working with local county leaders to identify strong candidates for House and Senate who will grasp the issues and commit to supporting them.

* We must organize our ground game to build strength in the high schools, universities, and grass roots organizations.

* We must improve communication between state leadership, the districts, the counties and the membership.

* The party has lacked transparency and accountability. We need to audit the books and become a lean, efficient operation. Vendors need to earn their business through a bidding process.

* It is time for the party to go on offense, to engage the voters in an issue-based campaign

Hoogendyk sent a letter to supporters on Thursday titled “Looking forward to Morning in Michigan.” In that letter, Hoogendyk, who was handily beaten for the U.S. Senate by Democratic incumbent Carl Levin, wrote the following:

Fellow Republicans, you have had a day to mourn. I challenge you to take off your sackcloth and ashes, anoint yourself and get back in the game. But let’s do things a little differently from now on. Let me suggest:

* We recommit to the Core Principles upon which this great party was founded.
* We decide as a party to stand firm on ALL of those principles, talk of them and LIVE them.
* We commit to recruiting candidates for office who firmly believe in those principles.
* We encourage our party chairs and members to work together in unity of purpose to elect candidates who will bring about real reform of government.

The former head of the Western Michigan University College Republicans, Megan Buwalda, has started a Facebook.com group to enlist Hoogendyk as the next chair of the MI GOP. Buwalda worked for Sen. John McCain’s presidential bid.

While the battle lines are beginning to be drawn, with the traditional fractures of east-west and social vs. fiscal conservatives in the party, Inside Michigan Politics Editor Bill Ballenger, who is a former elected Republican official in the state, said the party is in “terrible shape.”

“They have nobody waiting in the wings to pick up the pieces,” Ballenger said in a phone interview. “They have a lot of behind-the-scenes acrimony and infighting going on.”

Ballenger said the party is going to need a figure like former Gov. John Engler, who he said governed from the center and created a “big tent” approach to the party. He said since Engler’s departure the party has been left leaderless.

[Editor's note: The author of this article, Todd A. Heywood, was endorsed by the Ingham County Republican Executive Committee, under the leadership of Norm Shinkle, in his bid for re-election to the Lansing Community College Board of Trustees in 2003. Heywood is no longer a member of the board.]

Comments

  • geodesic

    Two problems with what was suggested here:

    1.) The article says: “We can’t keep fighting a 21st century war with 20th century weapons.” Try 15th century weapons. Get off the whole 'the bible is law' philosophy. Stop bringing that book into government.

    2.) “The Number One priority is reducing the size of government.” Why would you want to elect someone who wants to abolish what they were put in charge of running. it doesn't make any sense. The Government is suppost to be their to help it citizens, to work for them. Not against them …

    • cheneygun

      abolish government…are you sure you aren't confusing Republicans for anarchists?

      • geodesic

        Nope…

        • cheneygun

          I guess you are going to have to cite an example where a Republican said they want to “abolish government”. Reduce, yes….abolish…that's anarchist, not Republican.

          • Rayne1

            “”I don't want to abolish government. I simply want to reduce it to the size where I can drag it into the bathroom and drown it in the bathtub.”
            Grover Norquist

            Drowning the government after shrinking it repeatedly can hardly be seen as supportive of government.

            And I suppose we should expect Norquist's party affiliation to be denied if “drowning government” really equals “abolition of government”.

          • cheneygun

            Grover is no Republican. He IS the definition of Libertarian. Try again.

          • geodesic

            No, Libertarian is close enough palooka… Grover is one of the leaders of the modern conservative movement. Conservative is to Republican… Why are you even requesting proof that the main point of the Rep. party is too make government so small that it can't possibly help its people in a time of crisis? The Bush admin sure proved that with Katrina… didn't they? It's a pathetic excuse to privatize the wealth. You don't see any and the roads you drive on and the schools you or your childern went to sure as shit dont's see any…

          • geodesic

            you kind sir are a dickbutt and a retard. Obama already won. I have to do nothing but sit around and collect YOUR tax money… lol!!

          • Rayne1

            Ad hominem attacks are not in compliance with our comment policy, which you can find via link at the bottom of our site.

          • Rayne1

            Yeah, Norquist is such a good Libertarian that he supports Libertarian candidates, like Bob Barr, or Republican candidates who are perceived as Libertarian within their party, like Ron Paul.

            Sure.

            I should have set a stop watch to clock the time from when I posted Norquist as an example to your denial of Norquist as a Republican.

            Will the rest of the GOP disavow Norquist, reject his donations and the donations of affiliated organizations like Club for Growth, Americans for Tax Reform, Michigan Taxpayers Alliance? Will they tell Norquist to take a flying leap the next time he demands an oath of fealty to him by swearing “No New Taxes”? Will the GOP insist that Norquist's minions cease and desist with non-local, resource-draining recall efforts against incumbents?

            You'll note I'm not going to hold my breath.

          • cheneygun

            RAYNE:
            This is absurd. A leftist with their own unique classifications of the right wing. That's like me saying Socialists and Democrats are the same things. Socialist websites and newspapers spoke highly of Obama, does that make Obama socialist?

            One of the dunderheads above said that Republicans want to “abolish” government…prove it. You listed ONE person who is a libertarian by belief and by his own words.

            If 45% of the country is Republican, surely you can list one ACTUAL Republican who wants to “Abolish” government?????

            It does not matter if Republicans take money from Norquist. I would take money from anyone that wanted to get me elected.

            GEODESIC:
            You said “No, Libertarian is close enough palooka”
            Then you will agree with me that Communism is a hop skip and a jump away from being a Democrat?

            The point of the GOP is to make government so small it cannot help in a time of crisis?? I don't know you personally, but is it possible that you are a little slow?

            If you agree with that mildly retarded statement, then you will also agree that Democrats want to expand government so much as to create a socialist welfare state where every person who has made it is punished as the enemy.

            Again we are talking about Norquist. Email him and ask him! He is a libertarian and everyone who would spend two seconds looking into it would see that.

            If 45% of the country is Republican…LIST ONE person who wants to abolish government.

          • Rayne1

            I found an example of a Republican who wants to abolish government. That's what you asked for.

            As for all Republicans wanting to abolish government, I'm willing to agree that many don't. I'm sure that the owners of Halliburton and other corporate members of the military-industrial complex are quite glad there's a government. I'm also certain that any number of Republicans in the finance industry are currently glad for the government “backstop” they are abusing (speaking of socialists).

          • cheneygun

            And who said that? What is the context?

          • Rayne1

            Apparently you're just here to try and pick a fight.

            You asked for an example, you got one in Norquist, you didn't like it. Playing dumb isn't going to get around that.

            Now either you have something constructive to say about the content of this post — which, if you need a reminder, is about the loss of direction and identity among Republicans — or I'll do some boundary setting and comment policy compliance.

          • cheneygun

            Apparently you dont understand Grover isnt a Republican. Secondly when you quote someone you put it in quotations AND attribute it to someone.

            Lastly I asked for an example outside of Norquist (because if all Republicans believe that, surely you would have thousands of examples) and you post a comment, dont say who it attributed to.

            If you dont want to debate then dont. I didnt ask you to and personally I dont know you and dont want to.

            You can restructure whatever you want, its your rag.

          • Rayne1

            “I don't want to abolish government. I simply want to reduce it to the size where I can drag it into the bathroom and drown it in the bathtub.”
            – Grover Norquist

            There you go, since you chose to miss it the first time.

            As for your claim that Norquist is not a Republican:
            – Reason magazine characterizes Norquist as a Republican strategist — and Norquist doesn't file objection anywhere;
            – Norquist is a former executive director of the College Republicans (early 1980's);
            – He was a Republican campaign staffer for the Republican Platform Committee during the late 1980's through the mid-1990's;
            – Norquist is on the board of directors of the National Federation of Republican Assemblies;
            – He's been president of the District of Columbia Republican Assembly, D.C.'s NFRA affiliate;
            – He's also been president of the Advisory Board, Ronald Reagan Legacy Project (RRLP).

            The reason why Norquist won't make a case out of his status as a Republican leader is that the tax-exempt status of his political organizations requires him to appear to be acting in a nonpartisan fashion. But a leopard doesn't change his spots; Norquist is still a Republican under all the legalese.

            Perhaps Norquist might be asking whether you're a Republican if you can't recognize one of your party's leaders.

            Maybe this is an informative if annoying exercise: perhaps if the Republican Party is now disavowing its leaders who've shaped their ideology over the last 20-plus years, they are now without ideology at all.

          • cheneygun

            I guess this is a point that is impossible to explain on here. I agree, his spots are hard to change…he's libertarian. Many people use the Republican Parties structure to get to where they want to be.

            Since I am tired of explaining that to you (im sure you have never talked to Grover) I will pretend that Grover is a Republican.

            One man has been listed out of 45% of the population. Do you suppose if that statement were true you might be able to think of one more…one perhaps that isn't questionable?

          • cheneygun

            As far as picking a fight no one was talking to you. Its none of your damn business.

          • Rayne1

            Second warning.

            Comply with the comment policy if you wish to continue to comment at this site.

  • Rayne1

    Second warning.

    Comply with the comment policy if you wish to continue to comment at this site.

  • Rayne1

    “I don't want to abolish government. I simply want to reduce it to the size where I can drag it into the bathroom and drown it in the bathtub.”
    – Grover Norquist

    There you go, since you chose to miss it the first time.

    As for your claim that Norquist is not a Republican:
    – Reason magazine characterizes Norquist as a Republican strategist — and Norquist doesn't file objection anywhere;
    – Norquist is a former executive director of the College Republicans (early 1980's);
    – He was a Republican campaign staffer for the Republican Platform Committee during the late 1980's through the mid-1990's;
    – Norquist is on the board of directors of the National Federation of Republican Assemblies;
    – He's been president of the District of Columbia Republican Assembly, D.C.'s NFRA affiliate;
    – He's also been president of the Advisory Board, Ronald Reagan Legacy Project (RRLP).

    The reason why Norquist won't make a case out of his status as a Republican leader is that the tax-exempt status of his political organizations requires him to appear to be acting in a nonpartisan fashion. But a leopard doesn't change his spots; Norquist is still a Republican under all the legalese.

    Perhaps Norquist might be asking whether you're a Republican if you can't recognize one of your party's leaders.

    Maybe this is an informative if annoying exercise: perhaps if the Republican Party is now disavowing its leaders who've shaped their ideology over the last 20-plus years, they are now without ideology at all.

  • cheneygun

    I guess this is a point that is impossible to explain on here. I agree, his spots are hard to change…he's libertarian. Many people use the Republican Parties structure to get to where they want to be.

    Since I am tired of explaining that to you (im sure you have never talked to Grover) I will pretend that Grover is a Republican.

    One man has been listed out of 45% of the population. Do you suppose if that statement were true you might be able to think of one more…one perhaps that isn't questionable?

  • Rayne1

    Second warning.

    Comply with the comment policy if you wish to continue to comment at this site.

  • Rayne1

    “I don't want to abolish government. I simply want to reduce it to the size where I can drag it into the bathroom and drown it in the bathtub.”
    – Grover Norquist

    There you go, since you chose to miss it the first time.

    As for your claim that Norquist is not a Republican:
    – Reason magazine characterizes Norquist as a Republican strategist — and Norquist doesn't file objection anywhere;
    – Norquist is a former executive director of the College Republicans (early 1980's);
    – He was a Republican campaign staffer for the Republican Platform Committee during the late 1980's through the mid-1990's;
    – Norquist is on the board of directors of the National Federation of Republican Assemblies;
    – He's been president of the District of Columbia Republican Assembly, D.C.'s NFRA affiliate;
    – He's also been president of the Advisory Board, Ronald Reagan Legacy Project (RRLP).

    The reason why Norquist won't make a case out of his status as a Republican leader is that the tax-exempt status of his political organizations requires him to appear to be acting in a nonpartisan fashion. But a leopard doesn't change his spots; Norquist is still a Republican under all the legalese.

    Perhaps Norquist might be asking whether you're a Republican if you can't recognize one of your party's leaders.

    Maybe this is an informative if annoying exercise: perhaps if the Republican Party is now disavowing its leaders who've shaped their ideology over the last 20-plus years, they are now without ideology at all.

  • cheneygun

    I guess this is a point that is impossible to explain on here. I agree, his spots are hard to change…he's libertarian. Many people use the Republican Parties structure to get to where they want to be.

    Since I am tired of explaining that to you (im sure you have never talked to Grover) I will pretend that Grover is a Republican.

    One man has been listed out of 45% of the population. Do you suppose if that statement were true you might be able to think of one more…one perhaps that isn't questionable?