Top Stories

The Michigan Messenger going forward

By Staff Report | 11.16.11

I am writing today to announce the closure of the Michigan Messenger. After four years of operation in Michigan, the board of the American Independent News Network, has decided to shift publication of its news into a single site, The American Independent at Americanindependent.com. This is part of a shift in strategy, towards new forms [...]

Colorado-based abstinence program provided false and misleading information to Michigan students

HIV-AIDS-small
By Todd A. Heywood | 11.16.11

An abstinence-only presentation provided to numerous school districts in Calhoun and Eaton Counties in October of this year provided false and misleading information to students about HIV, experts allege.

Class action lawsuit filed against MERS over unpaid taxes

foreclosure
By Todd A. Heywood | 11.15.11

Two county registers of deeds filed a class action lawsuit Monday on behalf of Michigan’s 83 counties alleging that the Mortgage Electronic Registration Services owes millions of dollars in property title transfer taxes.

Schuette fights important mercury regulations

epa_logo
By Eartha Jane Melzer | 11.14.11

Despite evidence of the impact of mercury on children and public health, Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette last month joined with 24 other state attorneys general in filing a lawsuit to scuttle new EPA regulations that would reduce mercury emissions from power plants.

Democrat wants recount of Oakland clerk race

By Eartha Jane Melzer | 11.07.08 | 1:26 pm
Oakland County clerk  Ruth Johnson and Democratic candidate Sheila Smith

Oakland County clerk Ruth Johnson and Democratic candidate Sheila Smith

The tight race for election administrator in Oakland County may yield an audit of vote-counting machines that worried the current clerk.

Sheila Smith, the Democratic candidate for county clerk, told Michigan Messenger that she will ask for a recount in her apparently unsuccessful race against incumbent Republican Ruth Johnson.

Johnson questioned the integrity of the county’s vote-tallying machines in an Oct. 24 letter to the federal Election Assistance Commission. The letter was not published by the agency until election eve. In the letter, Johnson warned that 8 percent of the county’s ES&S M100 vote tabulators had failed pre-election logic and accuracy testing. Johnson expressed concern that machine malfunctions — said to be caused by dust build-up — could skew vote totals.

“My understanding is that the problem could occur and election workers would have no inkling the ballots were being misread,” she wrote.

The margin in the clerk race stands at less than 1 percent, with Johnson the winner.

On Election Day, Johnson’s office in Pontiac revealed that no state or federal agencies had taken action to address her concerns and that her office had plans to conduct a hand-count of ballots.

Oakland has not finished tabulating the election, Tracy Ward, spokeswoman for the county, told Michigan Messenger. Ward would not say whether any of the ballots are being hand-counted. She said some overseas ballots delivered that day had yet to be counted. The current count is 294,909 for Johnson and 289,287 for Smith.

A call to Oakland County elections director Joe Rozell for details on the counting process was not returned.

Voting rights were a key issue in her campaign, said Smith, who took a leave from work as political director at Michigan Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) to run for clerk, and a recount in Oakland could be an important way to address citizen concerns about the controversial ES&S M100 machines.

“My platform was voter protection and education, and now I am taking it to another level,“ she said. “When you come that close, you need to test it. “

Smith said that if she were serving as clerk and found herself in a very close race after publicly questioning the counting machines, she would do a recount.

She said she is consulting with her staff and attorneys and with the Oakland County Democratic Party on how to proceed.

A Thursday Detroit Free Press report on the strong Democratic gains in Oakland County, “Democrats bust GOP’s hold in Oakland,” described Smith as “little-known and underfunded.”

On Election Day, Nancy Banks, city clerk for the Oakland County city of Southfield, told Michigan Messenger that her community did experience pre-election machine failures but said that the machines were serviced and in working order by the time voting began. “I would not have held this election if I did not have 100 percent confidence in our ability to count the vote,” Banks said.

But tabulators did break down in Southfield and in other parts of Oakland County later that day, Ward told Michigan Messenger.

One national watchdog organization, OurVoteLive.org told the Detroit News on Election Day: “Voters are reporting from almost every corner of [Michigan] that the machines they are trying to feed their ballots into are malfunctioning and giving them error messages. That’s not good.”

Oakland has until Nov. 18 to certify the election, according to recount protocol information from the secretary of state’s office, and Smith will then have six days to request a recount.

If she does, the ballots will be counted by hand and Smith will be required to foot the bill, expected to be around $6,500. This money is returned if the election is reversed.

Todd A. Heywood contributed to this report.

Comments

  • PRFinn

    Most states have a similar pay-for-recount provision, with a refund if the challenger is correct. However, this creates a strong financial incentive for government to keep the result the same, because if the result is reversed, then the government has to absorb the cost of the recount.

    In a national study of statewide recounts, there was an interesting difference between automatic recounts triggered by law (and thus not paid for) and recounts requested by candidates: The ones triggered by law resulted in substantially greater gains for the second place finisher than for the ostensible winner. But, there really shouldn't be this kind of difference, in fact, given that challengers have to lay down some “bread” before requesting a recount, they are hesitant to move forward except when they have some extra reasons to believe the first count may not have been correct.

    Stay tuned, this should be an interesting story, and thanks to the reporters doing it.

  • http://journals.democraticunderground.com/Land%20Shark Land Shark

    Most states have a similar pay-for-recount provision, with a refund if the challenger is correct. However, this creates a strong financial incentive for government to keep the result the same, because if the result is reversed, then the government has to absorb the cost of the recount.

    In a national study of statewide recounts, there was an interesting difference between automatic recounts triggered by law (and thus not paid for) and recounts requested by candidates: The ones triggered by law resulted in substantially greater gains for the second place finisher than for the ostensible winner. But, there really shouldn't be this kind of difference, in fact, given that challengers have to lay down some “bread” before requesting a recount, they are hesitant to move forward except when they have some extra reasons to believe the first count may not have been correct.

    Stay tuned, this should be an interesting story, and thanks to the reporters doing it.

  • http://journals.democraticunderground.com/Land%20Shark Land Shark

    Most states have a similar pay-for-recount provision, with a refund if the challenger is correct. However, this creates a strong financial incentive for government to keep the result the same, because if the result is reversed, then the government has to absorb the cost of the recount.

    In a national study of statewide recounts, there was an interesting difference between automatic recounts triggered by law (and thus not paid for) and recounts requested by candidates: The ones triggered by law resulted in substantially greater gains for the second place finisher than for the ostensible winner. But, there really shouldn't be this kind of difference, in fact, given that challengers have to lay down some “bread” before requesting a recount, they are hesitant to move forward except when they have some extra reasons to believe the first count may not have been correct.

    Stay tuned, this should be an interesting story, and thanks to the reporters doing it.

  • Pingback: News From Underground: Turnout questions; a good Electoral College map; and ES&S update in Michigan

  • Pingback: The BRAD BLOG : 'Daily Voting News' For November 08, 2008