Top Stories

The Michigan Messenger going forward

By Staff Report | 11.16.11

I am writing today to announce the closure of the Michigan Messenger. After four years of operation in Michigan, the board of the American Independent News Network, has decided to shift publication of its news into a single site, The American Independent at Americanindependent.com. This is part of a shift in strategy, towards new forms [...]

Colorado-based abstinence program provided false and misleading information to Michigan students

HIV-AIDS-small
By Todd A. Heywood | 11.16.11

An abstinence-only presentation provided to numerous school districts in Calhoun and Eaton Counties in October of this year provided false and misleading information to students about HIV, experts allege.

Class action lawsuit filed against MERS over unpaid taxes

foreclosure
By Todd A. Heywood | 11.15.11

Two county registers of deeds filed a class action lawsuit Monday on behalf of Michigan’s 83 counties alleging that the Mortgage Electronic Registration Services owes millions of dollars in property title transfer taxes.

Schuette fights important mercury regulations

epa_logo
By Eartha Jane Melzer | 11.14.11

Despite evidence of the impact of mercury on children and public health, Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette last month joined with 24 other state attorneys general in filing a lawsuit to scuttle new EPA regulations that would reduce mercury emissions from power plants.

ACORN prosecutor active in McCain’s ‘inner circle’

By Ed Brayton | 10.22.08 | 9:44 am
Michigan Attorney General Mike Cox speaks at a McCain campaign rally on Sept. 5 in Sterling Heights, Mich.

Michigan Attorney General Mike Cox speaks at a McCain campaign rally on Sept. 5 in Sterling Heights, Mich.

On Jan. 15, 2008, Attorney General Mike Cox mingled with the crowd of John McCain supporters at the Sheraton in Novi as they awaited the results of that day’s Michigan Republican primary, hoping that their candidate would beat out Mitt Romney and continue the momentum he gained by winning the New Hampshire primary the previous week.

It had been 13 months, almost to the day, since Cox had surprised the Republican political establishment by becoming the Michigan chairman of McCain’s Exploratory Committee, the chair of McCain’s Michigan campaign and a member of the McCain Michigan Finance Committee that raised and distributed funds for the campaign.

Upon that announcement, McCain released a statement praising Cox as “as one of the very best crime fighters in the country,” and someone who will serve as “an important member of (McCain’s) inner circle.” On this night, which turned out to be a difficult one for McCain supporters as Romney won the Michigan primary, Cox was returning the compliment. “I think he’s much like John F. Kennedy, in that he’s a true American hero,” Cox told the crowd.

Fast forward to Sept. 5, the day after the Republican National Convention closed in Minneapolis. That day the final stretch of the campaign began with a rally for McCain and the newly nominated Sarah Palin at the Freedom Hill Amphitheatre in Sterling Heights. Cox helped warm up the crowd for Palin and McCain, recalling his days as a U.S. Marine and praising McCain’s military service. He echoed McCain’s attacks on Barack Obama for not being sufficiently supportive of the war in Iraq, saying, “Those who worship at the false god of peace only lead to appeasement.”

Fast forward again to Oct. 14, the day that Cox announced the filing of forgery charges against former ACORN canvasser Antonio Johnson over acts that had taken place several months earlier. Cox’s action coincided with a nationwide campaign by Republicans and conservatives to charge that ACORN is seeking to fraudulently affect the outcome of the Nov. 4 presidential election. On the very same day that Cox announced those charges, the McCain campaign held a news conference in which it claimed that ACORN was engaged in massive voter fraud. “If left uncorrected, these numerous investigations and accusations of voter fraud with ACORN could produce a nightmare scenario on Election Day,” McCain campaign manager Rick Davis said in a prepared statement.

Some McCain allies even argued that the election might be stolen from them. Sen. Lindsey Graham, one of McCain’s closest confidants and supporters, told an Indiana newspaper, “We could lose, I suppose, if they cheat us out of it. I think the only way we lose a state like North Carolina or Indiana is to get cheated out of it.”

The Michigan prosecution was also announced on the same day that a Republican-affiliated group in Ohio filed a corruption and racketeering suit in state court against ACORN.

ACORN pays canvassers to register voters in low-income and African-American neighborhoods where voter participation is often low. ACORN says that it is cooperating fully with the prosecution of Johnson. The response from conservative media and Web sites was swift and outraged. RightMichigan declared: “Let’s be crystal clear here, people. The Democrats want this election, and if they can’t win it on their own they are willing to steal it.”

Did Cox’s support for McCain influence the timing of the prosecution of Johnson? At least one prominent expert thinks it might have. Gerry Hebert, the executive director of the Campaign Legal Center in Washington, which was founded by McCain campaign attorney Trevor Potter, told the Michigan Messenger that the timing of the Johnson prosecution suggests that the attorney general is trying to use the prosecution for political effect:

“It is clear that Michigan AG Cox is deeply immersed in the McCain-Palin campaign. As such, his involvement with the indictment of an ACORN contractor at a minimum gives the appearance of being politically motivated and less than even-handed. The timing of the announcement is also suspicious, coming as it did months after the information first surfaced and around the same time that the ACORN controversy emerged as a political issue.”

Saul Anuzis, chair of the Michigan Republican Party, hailed the move by Cox on his blog, writing (or citing an article, it is not quite clear), “This is a story that is just starting to get some traction nationwide as law enforcement begins to peel back the fraudulent practices of the extreme Left.”

Multiple calls and e-mails to the McCain campaign and to the attorney general’s office were not answered.

Comments

  • cheneygun

    Just when you think that there is no possible way leftists can spin clear voter fraud on their side…here you have it. Good job Ed. What about the Democrat state officials out west that are also prosecuting ACORN?????

    You said “Fast forward again to Oct. 14, the day that Cox announced the filing of forgery charges against former ACORN canvasser Antonio Johnson over acts that had taken place several months earlier.”

    HAVE YOU EVER HEARD OF AN INVESTIGATION?? In stead of grasping for straws on this, why don't you look into ACORN people right in Lansing. I don't suspect you would do that though…because you have no problems with these games when they are done by people on your side.

    • Rayne1

      Would you care to disclose whether you have any vested interest as a GOP official in improving the standing of the GOP with the general public?

      Do you have a conflict of interest here of your own?

      And since you brought up the investigation “out west”, would you care to leave some solid facts about that situation here, instead of making insinuations?

    • ebrayton

      cheneygun wrote:

      Just when you think that there is no possible way leftists can spin clear voter fraud on their side…here you have it.

      I didn't say anything at all about voter fraud, which did not take place in this case (voter registration fraud is not the same thing as voter fraud). Nor did I spin anything about the charges, which are quite likely to be true (the evidence in such cases is quite straightforward, such that if they have the evidence to bring charges they will probably be able to get a conviction). Nor has ACORN disputed the charges.

      HAVE YOU EVER HEARD OF AN INVESTIGATION??

      Of course I have, but according to Gerry Hebert, who spent two decades doing such investigations for the DOJ, there is no reason why an investigation into a case this simple should have taken this long. The person I spoke to at the Jackson city attorney's office told me that the police investigation there took place in July and was sent to the elections division of the Secretary of State's office. I don't know for certain that the case was held until now for political purposes. I don't know that because the attorney general's office refused to answer my questions despite several phone calls to their office. They could, of course, have defended against the charge and proven them wrong. But one of the foremost experts in voter fraud in the nation – the executive director of an organization founded by McCain lawyer Trevor Potter, who was hired into the DOJ under Richard Nixon, so it can hardly be claimed that he is a partisan – thinks the timing suggests that. And I would have been happy to report the arguments against that suggestion, but no one from the AG's office or the McCain campaign would provide it.

      In stead of grasping for straws on this, why don't you look into ACORN people right in Lansing. I don't suspect you would do that though…because you have no problems with these games when they are done by people on your side.

      Once again, you are shifting the ground. This article is not about the validity of the charges, which neither I nor ACORN disputes. Nor, by the way, are the Democrats “my side.” I am not a Democrat and I am not voting for Obama on election day, so despite your presumptuous claims, I do not have a “side” to defend here.

  • cheneygun

    If doing what is best for the country is a conflict of interest then I suppose I am guilty. I do not work for any Republican candidate or cause, so I am not tied to them in any way.

    Solid facts about out west or here? 3 or 4 months is not uncommon in a case like this in Michigan. You are grasping for straws.

    • Rayne1

      Readers: please note the earlier comment posted by “cheneygun” below.

      To the best of our knowledge, “cheneygun” is a local Republican Party official in Michigan and therefore has a vested interest in promotion of his party, an interest he is not disclosing in his comments so far.

      The “solid facts about out west” as readers can see are not forthcoming, and the situation is being used as a red herring.

      The 3 or 4 months mentioned in the comment above apparently refer to an investigation, however the timing of release of information about the investigation is in question and is the focus of the article above. Why would a law enforcement official seek to create questions about an election by generating disruptive news within 30 days before the election, rather than waiting to publicize information after the election? Federal law enforcement are not supposed to do this until after an election so as not to unduly influence elections (see Federal Prosecution of Election Offenses, 7th Edition) — why would a state law enforcement agency be held to a lesser standard?

      • cheneygun

        Rayne. yes I am. I thought that everyone and their grandmother knew that information. I don't have to disclose that I am a Republican Party secretary every time I do an online post. Matter of fact I don't ever have to disclose anything.

        A Conservative and a Socialist should both be concerned about election fraud. Did you disclose that you are a leftist and that this very website is funded by leftists?? Why don't you clarify for everyone YOUR stake in this?

        Instead of talking about my motivation, let's talk about ACORNS blatant corruption and disregard for the rule of law.

        You said “Why would a law enforcement official seek to create questions about an election by generating disruptive news within 30 days before the election, rather than waiting to publicize information after the election?”

        YOU THINK HE SHOULD WAIT UNTIL AFTER THE ELECTION WHEN THE VOTER FRAUD HAS ALREADY OCCURRED? SO YOU ARE SAYING A CONVICTED FELONS PR IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN OUR ELECTIONS NOT BEING TAINTED??

  • ebrayton

    cheneygun wrote:

    Just when you think that there is no possible way leftists can spin clear voter fraud on their side…here you have it.

    I didn't say anything at all about voter fraud, which did not take place in this case (voter registration fraud is not the same thing as voter fraud). Nor did I spin anything about the charges, which are quite likely to be true (the evidence in such cases is quite straightforward, such that if they have the evidence to bring charges they will probably be able to get a conviction). Nor has ACORN disputed the charges.

    HAVE YOU EVER HEARD OF AN INVESTIGATION??

    Of course I have, but according to Gerry Hebert, who spent two decades doing such investigations for the DOJ, there is no reason why an investigation into a case this simple should have taken this long. The person I spoke to at the Jackson city attorney's office told me that the police investigation there took place in July and was sent to the elections division of the Secretary of State's office. I don't know for certain that the case was held until now for political purposes. I don't know that because the attorney general's office refused to answer my questions despite several phone calls to their office. They could, of course, have defended against the charge and proven them wrong. But one of the foremost experts in voter fraud in the nation – the executive director of an organization founded by McCain lawyer Trevor Potter, who was hired into the DOJ under Richard Nixon, so it can hardly be claimed that he is a partisan – thinks the timing suggests that. And I would have been happy to report the arguments against that suggestion, but no one from the AG's office or the McCain campaign would provide it.

    In stead of grasping for straws on this, why don't you look into ACORN people right in Lansing. I don't suspect you would do that though…because you have no problems with these games when they are done by people on your side.

    Once again, you are shifting the ground. This article is not about the validity of the charges, which neither I nor ACORN disputes. Nor, by the way, are the Democrats “my side.” I am not a Democrat and I am not voting for Obama on election day, so despite your presumptuous claims, I do not have a “side” to defend here.

  • ebrayton

    cheneygun wrote:

    Just when you think that there is no possible way leftists can spin clear voter fraud on their side…here you have it.

    I didn't say anything at all about voter fraud, which did not take place in this case (voter registration fraud is not the same thing as voter fraud). Nor did I spin anything about the charges, which are quite likely to be true (the evidence in such cases is quite straightforward, such that if they have the evidence to bring charges they will probably be able to get a conviction). Nor has ACORN disputed the charges.

    HAVE YOU EVER HEARD OF AN INVESTIGATION??

    Of course I have, but according to Gerry Hebert, who spent two decades doing such investigations for the DOJ, there is no reason why an investigation into a case this simple should have taken this long. The person I spoke to at the Jackson city attorney's office told me that the police investigation there took place in July and was sent to the elections division of the Secretary of State's office. I don't know for certain that the case was held until now for political purposes. I don't know that because the attorney general's office refused to answer my questions despite several phone calls to their office. They could, of course, have defended against the charge and proven them wrong. But one of the foremost experts in voter fraud in the nation – the executive director of an organization founded by McCain lawyer Trevor Potter, who was hired into the DOJ under Richard Nixon, so it can hardly be claimed that he is a partisan – thinks the timing suggests that. And I would have been happy to report the arguments against that suggestion, but no one from the AG's office or the McCain campaign would provide it.

    In stead of grasping for straws on this, why don't you look into ACORN people right in Lansing. I don't suspect you would do that though…because you have no problems with these games when they are done by people on your side.

    Once again, you are shifting the ground. This article is not about the validity of the charges, which neither I nor ACORN disputes. Nor, by the way, are the Democrats “my side.” I am not a Democrat and I am not voting for Obama on election day, so despite your presumptuous claims, I do not have a “side” to defend here.