An argument in a voting rights lawsuit yesterday may offer a clue about Secretary of State Terri Lynn Land’s attitude toward Republican plans to challenge voters at the polls.
Judge Stephen J. Murphy III made no decision on the motion for preliminary injunction in the case of United States Student Association et al v. Land, which was heard in the U.S. District Court in Detroit yesterday.
The plaintiffs argued that the state of Michigan is violating the National Voter Registration Act by removing people from voting rolls if their voter ID cards come back as undeliverable or if they file for a driver’s license in another state. The suit asked the court to block these practices because they could disenfranchise people.
The Secretary of State’s Office has not responded to numerous requests for comment from Michigan Messenger.
But according to Bradley Heard, attorney for the Advancement Project, one of the plaintiffs in the case, during yesterday’s hearing, the secretary of state’s Bureau of Elections defended the practice of removing newly registered voters from the rolls when their voter ID cards are returned by claiming that non-delivery of mail is proof of non-residence.
The “no mail, no vote” argument from the secretary of state may indicate that the state will allow election challengers to challenge voter eligibility using returned mail.
Challenging voters using lists compiled from returned mail is something that Eric Doster, attorney for the Michigan GOP, has said he expects his party to do this Election Day.
More on the issues of United States Student Association et al v. Land to come.