Top Stories

The Michigan Messenger going forward

By Staff Report | 11.16.11

I am writing today to announce the closure of the Michigan Messenger. After four years of operation in Michigan, the board of the American Independent News Network, has decided to shift publication of its news into a single site, The American Independent at Americanindependent.com. This is part of a shift in strategy, towards new forms [...]

Colorado-based abstinence program provided false and misleading information to Michigan students

HIV-AIDS-small
By Todd A. Heywood | 11.16.11

An abstinence-only presentation provided to numerous school districts in Calhoun and Eaton Counties in October of this year provided false and misleading information to students about HIV, experts allege.

Class action lawsuit filed against MERS over unpaid taxes

foreclosure
By Todd A. Heywood | 11.15.11

Two county registers of deeds filed a class action lawsuit Monday on behalf of Michigan’s 83 counties alleging that the Mortgage Electronic Registration Services owes millions of dollars in property title transfer taxes.

Schuette fights important mercury regulations

epa_logo
By Eartha Jane Melzer | 11.14.11

Despite evidence of the impact of mercury on children and public health, Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette last month joined with 24 other state attorneys general in filing a lawsuit to scuttle new EPA regulations that would reduce mercury emissions from power plants.

EPA-smokestack

Upton supports bill to kill coal ash regulation

By Ed Brayton | 06.22.11 | 7:59 am

Rep. Fred Upton continues to use his tenure as chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee to attempt to strip the Environmental Protection Agency’s ability to regulate toxic substances that threaten the environment.

His committee is considering a new bill that would strip the EPA’s authority to regulate the handling of coal ash, a by-product of coal energy production that can contain a wide range of toxic metals and chemicals including arsenic, lead, chromium, and selenium.

In December, 2008, a massive retaining pond containing coal ash sludge broke through a retaining wall, spilling a billion gallons of toxic sludge flowing over 300 acres and all but destroying two rivers near a Tennessee Valley Authority coal plant.

Upton put out a statement in favor of the bill and one particular section jumped out:

My own state of Michigan takes pride in its rigorous but fair enforcement in these areas, so we were sure to make clear—in this case—that states may make their coal ash regulatory program even more stringent than federal standards. Michigan officials tell me that this provision is important to them, and I am glad that they are pleased with it and with the whole bill.

Coincidentally, the Republican-controlled state legislature is currently trying to pass a bill that would forbid the state from passing any regulations that are more strict than federal standards. If that bill passes it would cancel out one of Upton’s main arguments in favor of this federal bill.

Comments

  • Anonymous

    The legislation supported by Rep. Upton does NOT
    advocate preventing EPA from regulating coal ash. It simply seeks to prevent
    EPA from labeling coal ash a “hazardous waste” — an action that
    would cripple recycling of ash in applications like concrete production, where
    it is responsible for reducing more than 10 million tons of greenhouse gas
    emissions every year. EPA would still be free to implement its non-hazardous
    regulatory approach, which calls for the very same landfill improvements and
    gets them implemented faster.

    The best solution for coal ash disposal problems is to quit
    throwing coal ash away. Millions of tons of coal ash are safely recycled every
    year into construction materials like concrete and wallboard. That
    environmentally beneficial practice is threatened by articles like this one
    that irresponsibly label coal ash as “toxic.” In truth, it is no more
    toxic than the manufactured materials it replaces. Citizens for Recycling First
    can help you learn more. http://www.recyclingfirst.org

  • Anonymous

    Not quite as simple a problem as posed by this front group for the coal industry:
    http://www.nuvo.net/indianapolis/coal-ash-under-fire/Content?oid=2227891

Categories & Tags: Environment/Energy| | |