Top Stories

The Michigan Messenger going forward

By Staff Report | 11.16.11

I am writing today to announce the closure of the Michigan Messenger. After four years of operation in Michigan, the board of the American Independent News Network, has decided to shift publication of its news into a single site, The American Independent at Americanindependent.com. This is part of a shift in strategy, towards new forms [...]

Colorado-based abstinence program provided false and misleading information to Michigan students

HIV-AIDS-small
By Todd A. Heywood | 11.16.11

An abstinence-only presentation provided to numerous school districts in Calhoun and Eaton Counties in October of this year provided false and misleading information to students about HIV, experts allege.

Class action lawsuit filed against MERS over unpaid taxes

foreclosure
By Todd A. Heywood | 11.15.11

Two county registers of deeds filed a class action lawsuit Monday on behalf of Michigan’s 83 counties alleging that the Mortgage Electronic Registration Services owes millions of dollars in property title transfer taxes.

Schuette fights important mercury regulations

epa_logo
By Eartha Jane Melzer | 11.14.11

Despite evidence of the impact of mercury on children and public health, Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette last month joined with 24 other state attorneys general in filing a lawsuit to scuttle new EPA regulations that would reduce mercury emissions from power plants.

budget cuts

Luke: School cuts a tough sell

By Ed Brayton | 05.17.11 | 7:36 am

Peter Luke writes in the Grand Rapids Press that the steep cuts in state funding for K-12 education is going to be a very difficult sell for legislators in their home districts — especially with the School Aid Fund showing a big surplus in revenue.

As passed by the House, next year’s school budget would cut the minimum foundation allowance by about $426. That’s better than the $470 Snyder’s proposed, but it’s still more than the $340 passed by the Senate.

The reason for the cut is hundreds of millions are proposed to be siphoned from K-12 for those universities and community colleges. Keep all the money for K-12 and schools would be in line for a funding increase. But higher education, along with state-funded health care and other human service programs, also would be getting whacked a lot more than they are.

Snyder’s aim in the budget process has been to pour all state revenue into the same pot and have the sacrifice shared by all recipients of state spending. Unfortunately for Republican lawmakers, who to one degree or another have so far gone along, the public believes K-12 should be protected.

In an EPIC-MRA poll released last week, more than two-thirds of those surveyed opposed steep reductions in school aid. More than 60 percent said they’d support a constitutional amendment introduced by Democrats that would wall off the school aid fund for K-12 schools only.

But now the School Aid Fund surplus is expected to be even larger than anticipated, up to half a billion dollars more than projected during the January revenue estimating conference. Those new estimates set the stage for a possible revolt by some GOP lawmakers when the final budget comes up for a vote after the House and Senate reconcile their bills in a conference committee.

As Luke notes, Lt. Gov. Brian Calley had to break a 19-19 tie to get that budget passed the first time around because of Republican defections over the school cuts. Now that there will be significantly more money in the SAF this year, it’s likely that a few more Republicans will say no to those cuts on the final vote.

Comments

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Fred-Barton/1075433525 Fred Barton

    The initial reluctance of the new corporate oligarchs to restore funding to the schools points up the real reason they’re underfunded them in the first place. It’s not about “shared sacrifice” and “doing more with less,” it’s about underfunding the schools to the point where they break down, then using the argument that schools are not performing, to turn them into educorporate training facilities where learning becomes a commodity and your children’s access to it depends on the level of robustness in your bank account.

    The whole idea that we need to destroy public education to lower taxes for business and thus create jobs has been shown to be a fallacy for at least thirty years. A study done by Thomas Plaut and Joseph Pluta in 1983 stated:

    Although it has been argued that problems exist in measuring tax differentials among the states for different types of firms, previous studies have consistently found that state and local taxation is not a significant variable affecting industry location.  A similar conclusion has been reached regarding the effectiveness of other forms of publicly provided inducements to business firms.

    And it’s been pretty much the same since then. Even studies that found a relationship between taxes and business location found at best a “moderate” effect.

    The problem is no one will point out that the emperor has no clothes, and until someone, or someones (here we look at you Democratic party) step forward and place the argument in its proper frame, we’ll be stuck with a definition of common good that starts out with the word “profit.”

  • Anonymous

    Cuts this deep will increase the unemployment in the state.  Not sure how this will help the economy.