Top Stories

The Michigan Messenger going forward

By Staff Report | 11.16.11

I am writing today to announce the closure of the Michigan Messenger. After four years of operation in Michigan, the board of the American Independent News Network, has decided to shift publication of its news into a single site, The American Independent at Americanindependent.com. This is part of a shift in strategy, towards new forms [...]

Colorado-based abstinence program provided false and misleading information to Michigan students

HIV-AIDS-small
By Todd A. Heywood | 11.16.11

An abstinence-only presentation provided to numerous school districts in Calhoun and Eaton Counties in October of this year provided false and misleading information to students about HIV, experts allege.

Class action lawsuit filed against MERS over unpaid taxes

foreclosure
By Todd A. Heywood | 11.15.11

Two county registers of deeds filed a class action lawsuit Monday on behalf of Michigan’s 83 counties alleging that the Mortgage Electronic Registration Services owes millions of dollars in property title transfer taxes.

Schuette fights important mercury regulations

epa_logo
By Eartha Jane Melzer | 11.14.11

Despite evidence of the impact of mercury on children and public health, Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette last month joined with 24 other state attorneys general in filing a lawsuit to scuttle new EPA regulations that would reduce mercury emissions from power plants.

government-spending1

Snyder, GOP legislators agree on budget deal

By Ed Brayton | 04.12.11 | 6:06 pm

Gov. Rick Snyder and the Republican leadership in the state legislature announced that they had reached a tentative deal on budget matters that would modify some of Snyder’s proposals and phase in others over time.

The Detroit News reports:

Gov. Rick Snyder joined the Republican leaders from the House and Senate this afternoon to announce a tentative budget deal that will phase in and modify Snyder’s proposed tax on pensions and delay a scheduled reduction in the personal income tax rate…

Details are being worked on, they said, but the changes would continue the pension income tax exemption for residents born in 1946 or earlier and soften the impact for those born between 1947 and 1952…

The new proposal would exempt those aged 67 and older from the pension tax, Snyder said. For people 60 to 66 years old, the first $20,000 would be exempt for an individual and the first $40,000 for a couple. Pensions would be taxed at the full rate for retirees aged 59 and younger.

But once any Michigan resident turns 67, income exemptions of $20,000 for individuals and $40,000 for couples would apply, Snyder said. All income, including Social Security income, would apply against that higher-than-normal exemption, he said.

The tentative agreement also delays a scheduled decrease in the income tax, which was supposed to drop from 4.35 percent to 4.25 percent on Oct. 1, the start of the 2011-12 fiscal year. The tentative agreement would delay that planned reduction to Jan. 1, 2013, putting about an extra $170 million in state coffers, according to one source.

If the deal goes through, it will also require even more spending cuts than those already proposed because the phased in pension tax would bring in about $600 million less next year than the original plan and putting off the income tax decrease would only bring in about $170 million. No new cuts were specified by the GOP leaders today.

In a statement released to the press, Senate Democratic Leader Gretchen Whitmer (D-East Lansing) and House Democratic Leader Richard Hammel (D-Mt. Morris) said:

“The Republicans are putting a fresh coat of paint on the same plan to balance the budget on the backs of seniors, working families, and students while giving billions away to big corporations. This new proposal blatantly violates the Governor’s very own ‘simple, fair and efficient’ ideal. Their revised plan is nothing but a bait-and-switch that offers little relief in exchange for yet another tax increase on residents. It does nothing to resolve the concerns and frustrations that have brought people to the Capitol by the thousands in recent weeks to voice their opposition to his agenda. We also question the amount of revenue this plan will actually generate since the bulk of the revenue raised from the pension tax comes from hitting the lowest pensions.”

Comments

  • Anonymous

    This is not, by any stretch of the imagination, shared sacrifice. We made decisions to retire (under age 60) with careful consideration planning every penny. Adding a new huge tax burden will put many of us into foreclosure, or will force us to return to the workforce after already working for 38+ years. Snyder LIED about taxing pensions prior to the election saying he “had no interesting in touch it.”

    This should either be fully phased in for future retirees or entirely scrapped. Having seniors carry the burden to give breaks to the rich and business is disgusting.

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_ETDNMGBOC6DHEMAFZBAKMMDW3A Gregory Estelle

      We retired with the understanding of exactly how much we would make, and knew it would be tight, but never expected that would be subject to helping the rich and big business as a convenience to legislators to raise income in our state. It is a disgusting abuse of power, and to think they get all those perks for the rest of their life-that should be first and foremost Mr. Snyder’s shared tax burden-cut all benefits to themselves.

  • Anonymous

    WHEN VOTERS DON’T VOTE THIS IS WHAT YA GET FOOLS RUNNING THINGS FOR THERE FIRENDS, BIG MONEY.
    THERE IS CONSEQUENCES TO NOT VOTING.

  • Anonymous

    If they are looking for places to make up the difference between the lower revenue of the new proposed tax plan and Synder’s original one – maybe don’t lower the taxes on business so much – that would solve the revenue gap easily.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=527530532 Ken D. Orlich

    TAX THE RICH!