Top Stories

The Michigan Messenger going forward

By Staff Report | 11.16.11

I am writing today to announce the closure of the Michigan Messenger. After four years of operation in Michigan, the board of the American Independent News Network, has decided to shift publication of its news into a single site, The American Independent at Americanindependent.com. This is part of a shift in strategy, towards new forms [...]

Colorado-based abstinence program provided false and misleading information to Michigan students

HIV-AIDS-small
By Todd A. Heywood | 11.16.11

An abstinence-only presentation provided to numerous school districts in Calhoun and Eaton Counties in October of this year provided false and misleading information to students about HIV, experts allege.

Class action lawsuit filed against MERS over unpaid taxes

foreclosure
By Todd A. Heywood | 11.15.11

Two county registers of deeds filed a class action lawsuit Monday on behalf of Michigan’s 83 counties alleging that the Mortgage Electronic Registration Services owes millions of dollars in property title transfer taxes.

Schuette fights important mercury regulations

epa_logo
By Eartha Jane Melzer | 11.14.11

Despite evidence of the impact of mercury on children and public health, Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette last month joined with 24 other state attorneys general in filing a lawsuit to scuttle new EPA regulations that would reduce mercury emissions from power plants.

MySpace sex offenders

Court filing says MySpace failed to remove sex offenders

Former contractor blows whistle on the company
By Todd A. Heywood | 02.25.11 | 8:22 am

Social networking giant MySpace.com knew about hundreds of registered sex offenders but failed to remove their profiles from the system, alleges the company’s former top contractor tasked with identifying offenders for the company.

John Cardillo is the former CEO of Sentinel Tech Holding Corporation. The company folded in 2010, but before that happened, Cardillo’s company was contracted by MySpace from late 2006 through 2009 to scour the database of accounts to identify registered sex offenders for removal.

But Cardillo now says in a sworn affidavit in a court case that MySpace did not act on hundreds of sex offenders he identified.

“Knowing that I had given MySpace a database that contained many (or possibly all) of the offenders Rambam identified, I cannot explain why they had not been removed at the time of Rambam’s disclosure,” Cardillo says in the affidavit. “Leaving the registered sex offenders with active MySpace profiles, despite being in possession that they were registered sex offenders, seems to indicate a breakdown in MySpace’s internal investigation and reconciliation process.”

In an exclusive interview with Michigan Messenger, Cardillo said that he was never told by MySpace staff what happened to the databases he turned over to them every two weeks. And he said management changes at MySpace.com soured the relationship with Sentinel officials.

“In the early days, it was responsive,” Cardillo said. “But after a management change it became a much different animal.”

“It just seemed like they had cut their staff and they were tired and overworked,” Cardillo said. “They just did not seem to be as cooperative.”

Those tensions resulted in delayed communications and eventually got so bad that Cardillo felt he had to end the relationship with MySpace.com.

Cardillo’s sworn statement is part of a libel lawsuit Steve Rambam, owner of the private investigation firm Pallorium, brought against both Cardillo and MySpace following comments made about him in a San Antonio newspaper story. Rambam had identified hundreds of registered sex offenders from Texas who maintained accounts on the social networking site.

Cardillo said when he received the matches produced by Rambam, he ran them against his own database and found all of the Texas offenders in question. He said he then checked MySpace for accounts, and found them still present on MySpace, even though those offenders had been turned over to the company much earlier.

Texas is not the only state to receive hundreds of identified sex offenders with MySpace accounts. Rambam and his Michigan-based partner Bob Kowalkoski turned over hundreds of names of Michigan Registered Sex Offenders to former Attorney General Mike Cox. In May, they gave Cox’s office information such as MySpace profile printouts, photos from the MySpace account, information from the Michigan Sex Offender Registry and any information available from the Michigan Department of Corrections.

“I think that it’s (the affidavit) roughly the equivalent of Haldermann flipping in the Watergate investigation,” said Rambam. “Cardillo was key player in everything MySpace did to screen out sex offenders. It shows that every allegation we’ve made is absolutely accurate.”

Cardillo says he would not characterize his statements in quite the same manner as Rambam does. Any system will have flaws others can exploit, Cardillo said, and expecting 100 percent effectiveness is “not realistic.”

“There’s not an entity on the planet — virtual, cyber or real — that can be completely locked down and still allow users a pleasant experience,” said Cardillo, who is a former NYC police officer. “You just hope that you get more bad guys.”

Rambam says that after he turned over his information to the Michigan Attorney General’s office, he heard nothing back from them.

“I didn’t hear from them again,” Rambam said. “This was not the limit of what we could have done on this.”

Rambam said the statement shows that while MySpace was publicly saying it was active in searching out sex offenders in its system, and even made an agreement in 2008 — a time when Cardillo and Sentinel was scouring the MySpace system for matches with sex offender registries — with 49 state attorneys general to increase scrutiny, but was doing something differently behind close doors.

While it is unclear if MySpace violated that 2008 AG agreement, Rambam says the statement shows they were “violating the spirit” of the agreement.

“This cries out for an immediate, official, aggressive investigation,” Ramba said. “The entire weight of the state of Michigan should be brought to bare on this.”

The office of Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette did not return calls seeking comment for this story.

MySpace.com declined to address the allegations in the affidavit, instead issuing the following statement to Michigan Messenger:

“Myspace is committed to the safety of our users and our terms of use strictly prohibit registered sex offenders. We actively monitor the site for registered sex offenders and when we receive lists or other notifications of alleged sex offenders from third parties, we initiate an internal review and take the appropriate action.”

While the social networking company, owned by Rupert Murdock’s NewsCorp, brushed off the sworn statement from Cardillo, Michigan lawmakers say they are “shocked” by the statement.

“I’m shocked by it,” said state Sen. Steve Bieda (D-Warren). “You’ve got a corporation that hasn’t followed up except with a public relations response.”

Bieda, who sits on the Senate Judiciary Committee, said the revelation requires an immediate investigation.

“I call on the attorney general’s office to do an investigation on this,” Bieda said. “This is a very severe and potential problem in this state.”

“I will send a letter to our attorney general informing him of this information,” Senate Judiciary Chair Sen. Rick Jones (R-Grand Ledge) .

Jones he will research introducing legislation “to stop sex offenders from using social media.”

Legsilation introduced in 2009 by Republican state Rep. Joe Haveman would have prohibited sex offenders from using social networking programs. The bill died in the House last session without getting a hearing.

Both Rambam and Cardillo agree, the legislation would be an excellent choice for the state.

“Convicted sex offenders should not be on My Space and it appears My Space’s own investigators have documented that, in fact, MySpace is still allowing sexual predators on their site,” says David Holtz, executive director of Progress Michigan. “So why no action by the Michigan Attorney General’s office? How is it that Attorney General Bill Schuette is on duty enough to bust bar owners for video poker games, but is AWOL in protecting our kids from sex offenders?”

The Michigan legislature is currently considering proposals to bring Michigan into compliance with the Adam Walsh Act, which requires several changes to the way the state’s sex offender registry is run. At the same time that some are pushing for more aggressive action against sex offenders, others are hoping to change the definition of a sex offender to remove those who were in consensual “Romeo and Juliet” relationships. Doing so, they say, would allow the punishing of real sexual predators without ruining the lives of those who have never been a threat to anyone.

Comments

  • Anonymous

    Is anyone even on Myspace anymore?

  • Anonymous

    Regarding the statement about the current Michigan Attorney General being AWOL on this matter is not an accurate or fair comment.

    The information that there were still RSO’s using active MySpace accounts, even after the company told AG’s from across the country that they have implemented security measures to remove them, was turned over to the Michigan Attorney General Office in May of 2010.

    The current Attorney General, Mr. Bill Schuette, was not even in office at that time, and I am sure that since he has only been in office for a couple months, he is not aware of every single investigation of his predecessor.

    When the RSO research was introduced to the Michigan AG’s Office, they were very appreciative and accepted the information, however, other than possible probation and parole violations, their actions were limited since at that time (and even today) there was no law to specifically prohibit this activity. The AG’s office cannot take action on “it should be against the law” – they only enforce what is alrady enacted into law by our legislators.

    Self-regulation in this matter is obviously not working – that is why there is still a need for new legislation to prohibit RSO’s from participating in any interactive social media networks, not just MySpace.

  • http://sexoffenderissues.blogspot.com SOIssues
  • http://twitter.com/SteveRSOonline Steve

    Many states prohibit RSOs from participating in online social media sites there; in some cases only where minors may be present while in others all sites are restricted. However if state or federal law does not prohibit use of the site why is this even an issue?

    Certainly you’re not suggesting that all RSOs are:

    1) Likely to re-offend
    2) Will pose a threat to other members of the site
    3) Can not avail themselves of the [sarcasm] wonders [/sarcasm] of social media

  • Anonymous

    our sex laws have become such a joke and are so off balance that we need too put a clown face on the other side of the planet and call this boppo the clown planet!

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_5OBYJRAYKRK3LAEWU6WE2YNR7U Tim

    Not all sex offenders were arrested for a crime that had anything to do with childern or the internet. To paint them all with one brush is wrong. And why do people we elect to office use social media. If those in office stop using it then maybe we can by law stop others from using social media. But as long as those in office use social networks then those on the sex offender registry should also be able to use it, even if its just to contact the people they elect to office.

  • Anonymous

    Our registry indeed has become a joke. Everyone is not the same. I wonder if drug dealers go on myspace. We know a murderer did. Did anyone ever get raped by an offender on myspace?????????????? I don’t think so. People are getting sick of all the hype over nothing. It is old and stale and it is over, so lets take down the registry and start over.

  • http://recidivismdata.com Sam Caldwell

    uh… has anyone actually measured the risk here?

    Probably not, since recidivism dates show a different outcome.

    http://recidivism.me

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Katelyn-Marist/100001924526641 Katelyn Marist

    I felt the need to revive this thread to add a much-needed and lengthy point: legally banishing “sex offenders” from “social media” sites is unconstitutional and extremely dangerous to our entire society.

    Most people have a knee-jerk reaction when they hear “sex offender” and will agree to almost any deprivation of liberty–although it is usually someone ELSE’s liberty they are agreeable to depriving–if it is to “protect the children.” This is inexcusable. When government is telling us we are in danger, we are, but it is the GOVERNMENT we need to fear more than their demon of the moment. As Ronald Reagan once said, “Government is never more dangerous than when our desire to have it help us blinds us to its great power to harm us.”

    I encourage everyone to do some serious constitutional and historical research. One of the things you will learn is a constitutional doctrine under First Amendment analysis called the “prior restraint” doctrine. It nearly-absolutely prohibits the government from stopping people in advance from speaking when, where, how, and to whom they choose, and it protects people with criminal records just as it does everyone else. Unlike nearly all other laws, prior restraints are presumptively unconstitutional when reviewed by a court, and it is a very heavy presumption. There is a damn good reason for this: when governments have the power to decide what is spoken and who speaks, they target as “dangerous” those opposed to their power, and in short order that society devolves into violence, tyranny, misery and ultimately anarchy.

    Ask yourself, if the government is allowed to prohibit certain groups that are deemed “dangerous” from communicating with the rest of us, what happens when the definition of “dangerous” changes? Most Americans have no idea what it’s like to live in a true tyranny; but I have lived in places where speaking out can literally get you killed, and I assure you it is the worst thing a human being can ever experience to live in that kind of fear. We do NOT want that here, and these laws that banish the unpopular from our electronic public forums are the first steps down that path.

    There are other reasons allowing any law like that proposed to stand is extremely dangerous. First, “social media” is VERY VERY vague. Criminal statutes are required to be clear and specific for two reasons: first, so that people can know how to follow the law, and second, so that the government doesn’t use the vagueness as a weapon of oppression. Imagine what would have happened to the Tea Party people if something like “disrupting governmental functions” or something like that were a crime. We must not allow our amazing society and freedoms to be destroyed out of fear of “sex offenders” or anyone else.

    Finally, we should all keep in mind that everything–even rape and child molestation–happens for a greater reason. As horrendous as the crimes they have committed may have been, we should have the utmost respect for the few “sex offenders” across the nation who have had the courage to stand up and challenge these laws at great personal risk to themselves and their families. They are carrying on the greatest traditions of our Framers by rebelling against oppression. And whether they know it or not, they are protecting the rest of us in the process. It is difficult to imagine a cover for assaulting our freedoms more convincing than “protecting the children from sex predators,” so as these people prevail they are securing those freedoms for all of us for quite some time.

    As for the victims, they should be comforted by the fact that their suffering has indirectly protected all of us from far greater suffering.

    I for one am grateful to everyone involved for that, and so should the rest of us be.

    “Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn’t pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children and our children’s children what it was once like in the United States where men were free.” – Ronald Reagan.