Top Stories

The Michigan Messenger going forward

By Staff Report | 11.16.11

I am writing today to announce the closure of the Michigan Messenger. After four years of operation in Michigan, the board of the American Independent News Network, has decided to shift publication of its news into a single site, The American Independent at Americanindependent.com. This is part of a shift in strategy, towards new forms [...]

Colorado-based abstinence program provided false and misleading information to Michigan students

HIV-AIDS-small
By Todd A. Heywood | 11.16.11

An abstinence-only presentation provided to numerous school districts in Calhoun and Eaton Counties in October of this year provided false and misleading information to students about HIV, experts allege.

Class action lawsuit filed against MERS over unpaid taxes

foreclosure
By Todd A. Heywood | 11.15.11

Two county registers of deeds filed a class action lawsuit Monday on behalf of Michigan’s 83 counties alleging that the Mortgage Electronic Registration Services owes millions of dollars in property title transfer taxes.

Schuette fights important mercury regulations

epa_logo
By Eartha Jane Melzer | 11.14.11

Despite evidence of the impact of mercury on children and public health, Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette last month joined with 24 other state attorneys general in filing a lawsuit to scuttle new EPA regulations that would reduce mercury emissions from power plants.

oilrefinery

Poll shows little support for abolishing EPA

By Eartha Jane Melzer | 02.02.11 | 3:16 pm

Most people, regardless of political affiliation, oppose Congressional efforts to block the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency from regulating pollution under the Clean Air Act, according to a new poll from ORC International.

The 1,007 person survey was commissioned by the Natural Resources Defense Council after former U.S. House Speaker Newt Gingrich, a Republican, called EPA a “very expensive bureaucracy that across the board makes it harder to solve problems” and suggested that the agency be dismantled.

Among the key findings of the poll:

Americans want the EPA to do more, not less. Almost two thirds of Americans (63 percent) say “the EPA needs to do more to hold polluters accountable and protect the air and water,” versus under a third (29 percent) who think the EPA already “does too much and places too many costly restrictions on businesses and individuals.” Well under half of Republicans (44 percent), less than a third of Independents (29 percent) and under a fifth of Democrats (16 percent) think the EPA is going too far today.

Americans do not want Congress to kill the EPA’s anti-pollution updates. Only 18 percent of Americans – including fewer than a third of Republicans (32 percent) — believe that “Congress should block the EPA from updating pollution safeguards,” after being told: “Some members of Congress are proposing to block the Environmental Protection Agency from updating safeguards to protect our health from dangerous air pollution, saying they will cost businesses too much money.” By contrast, more than three out of four Americans (77 percent) — including 61 percent of Republicans – say “Congress (should) let the EPA do its job.”

House Republican leaders are expected today to unveil new legislation aimed at blocking EPA from regulating greenhouse gas emissions.

Comments

  • Neill D varner

    As an agency, the US-EPA has been around for 40 years , having been established by the Nixon administration and the US Congress in December of 1970, along with the Federal OSHA act which regulates industrial practices and employees by promulgating standards which appear in The Federal Register….To criticize the EPA for not having done its job well is to disregard the freedoms inherent in this country which allow private enterprise its day in court…Much of the “science” behind regulation can be debated and debates tend to be longstanding ones which delay remediation and increase costs…BUT they safeguard us all from a totalitarian state and remain an essential part of the democratic process.

  • Anonymous

    Buy how different would the results be if the question was more like “Do you support the EPA proposed regulation of CO2 even if it dramatically increases the cost you and your employers pay for energy.”