Top Stories

The Michigan Messenger going forward

By Staff Report | 11.16.11

I am writing today to announce the closure of the Michigan Messenger. After four years of operation in Michigan, the board of the American Independent News Network, has decided to shift publication of its news into a single site, The American Independent at Americanindependent.com. This is part of a shift in strategy, towards new forms [...]

Colorado-based abstinence program provided false and misleading information to Michigan students

HIV-AIDS-small
By Todd A. Heywood | 11.16.11

An abstinence-only presentation provided to numerous school districts in Calhoun and Eaton Counties in October of this year provided false and misleading information to students about HIV, experts allege.

Class action lawsuit filed against MERS over unpaid taxes

foreclosure
By Todd A. Heywood | 11.15.11

Two county registers of deeds filed a class action lawsuit Monday on behalf of Michigan’s 83 counties alleging that the Mortgage Electronic Registration Services owes millions of dollars in property title transfer taxes.

Schuette fights important mercury regulations

epa_logo
By Eartha Jane Melzer | 11.14.11

Despite evidence of the impact of mercury on children and public health, Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette last month joined with 24 other state attorneys general in filing a lawsuit to scuttle new EPA regulations that would reduce mercury emissions from power plants.

Levin supports Senate staying in session until DADT repeal completed

By Todd A. Heywood | 12.07.10 | 11:34 am

U.S. Sen. Carl Levin (D-Detroit) has added his name — and considerable power — to keeping the lights on and the doors open for the Senate until the body passes legislation which eliminates the controversial ban on openly gay and lesbian service members.

Levin added his voice to those of Sen. Joe Lieberman’s (I-CT) and Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), reports Talking Points Memo.

Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell is a moniker for a law passed by Congress in 1993 when then President Bill Clinton attempted to remove the ban on gay soldiers, sailors, marines and air force members. Since then the policy has been under assault for dismissing needed military personnel solely because they are gay or lesbian.

President Barack Obama told Congress and the American people he would repeal the law by the end of the year, and the Senate has worked to make that happened. However, opponents of the repeal have called for a study on the impact such a move would have on the armed forces. That study was released last week and found that 70 percent of active military members said they would have no issue with serving with openly gay and lesbian service members.

That study, however, did not stop the controversy, and opponents have continued to block the legislation from moving. It is currently attached to the Department of Defense budget authorization for 2010-2011, which was supposed to have been passed by October.

Lawmakers have been focused on the Bush era tax cuts and unemployment extensions, but with those solved in an agreement between the White House and Republican leaders in Congress, lawmakers are shifting focus. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) has said he expects to vote on not only Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell repeal language before the end of the year, but also on the controversial DREAM Act. DREAM Act would provide a path to citizenship for youth brought to the U.S. illegally while minors. Under the legislation, eligible youth would be required to complete two years of higher education or military service before they could pursue citizenship.

Comments

  • Anonymous

    Why must the disgusting homosexuals smear the fecal filth of their sodomistic behaviors all over every single thing?

  • http://twitter.com/LPK1990 Martin Lewis

    @Atlas_Collins
    I’ll ignore your blatant homophobic idiocy and humor you for a second.

    The reason they want to serve openly is because they are fighting for their country. How are you meant to protect your country and fight for its freedom whilst it represses you for not fitting into the heteronormative views of society?

    It’s because of gay AND straight soldiers within the military that you have the privilege and right to express such narrow-minded opinions. Gay soldiers are not asking that the army becomes a big gay haven, and it’s not unfair of them to ask that they not be sacked just for existing. How exactly are they meant to fight for their country’s freedom when they themselves are denied that freedom?

    Think about that before you express such illogical and narrow-minded opinions. Thankfully opinions like yours are sinking out of mainstream views, and I welcome the day when your opinion is in the minority and you are forced to shut up and focus on your own life.

  • Anonymous

    You suggest that “President Barack Obama told Congress and the American people he would repeal the law by the end of the year, and the Senate has worked to make that happened.” Obama can’t repeal the law and all he said was he would “work with Congress to repeal DADT.”

    Congress repeals laws, not the President. We don’t have 60 votes and that isn’t Obama’s fault – it’s ours.

  • Anonymous

    THE DREAM ACT AND UNCONTROLLABLE CHAIN MIGRATION

    Not a word about the–CHAIN MIGRATION–afterwards. According to the Migration Policy Institute report, at least 2.1 million students will qualify under the act, and the sponsorship under the law will at least triplicate that number. Immediate family members will be eligible to come here, as a surety bond that the sponsors will financially support them. This seldom happens as the original sponsors tend to forget their promise or neglect their responsibility to follow through. Because the chain migration sponsorship laws are hardly ever enforced, the whole issue falls apart. Its ramification are the parents, brothers and sisters, grandmothers and grandfathers cannot support themselves financially, so they have no choice but to go on public welfare. So when the Liberals and House democrats state there is no cost, you might take a visit to county hospitals where these new immigrants ended up on dialysis costing millions of dollars in just one Texas hospital.

    This type of major problem is repeated across the United States, specifically in Border States. There are a whole bunch of liberal Progressives who remain brain-dead to the costs of sponsored senior citizens that arrive here, after the student or legal immigrant executed an affidavit of support. The majority of these people will be a massive financial burden on taxpayers and not on the initial sponsor. Chain Migration will become a extremely expensive situation, because families who come here have children, who under the misinterpreted 14th amendment gets instant citizenship. Anchor Babies are a cornucopia of welfare cash payments, and even more entitlements, including low income housing that the whole family moves into. This vicious circle never ends and actually accelerates costing hundreds of billions of dollars annually and will never cease until the political parties stop pandering to foreign nationals and carry out the interest of citizens.

    Those taxpayers who have had enough, DEMAND of your Senators with your angry words and your Members of Congress to oppose the DREAM Act Amnesty — 202-224-3121 NumbersUSA for details. NumbersUSA will inform you of the truth.