Top Stories

The Michigan Messenger going forward

By Staff Report | 11.16.11

I am writing today to announce the closure of the Michigan Messenger. After four years of operation in Michigan, the board of the American Independent News Network, has decided to shift publication of its news into a single site, The American Independent at Americanindependent.com. This is part of a shift in strategy, towards new forms [...]

Colorado-based abstinence program provided false and misleading information to Michigan students

HIV-AIDS-small
By Todd A. Heywood | 11.16.11

An abstinence-only presentation provided to numerous school districts in Calhoun and Eaton Counties in October of this year provided false and misleading information to students about HIV, experts allege.

Class action lawsuit filed against MERS over unpaid taxes

foreclosure
By Todd A. Heywood | 11.15.11

Two county registers of deeds filed a class action lawsuit Monday on behalf of Michigan’s 83 counties alleging that the Mortgage Electronic Registration Services owes millions of dollars in property title transfer taxes.

Schuette fights important mercury regulations

epa_logo
By Eartha Jane Melzer | 11.14.11

Despite evidence of the impact of mercury on children and public health, Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette last month joined with 24 other state attorneys general in filing a lawsuit to scuttle new EPA regulations that would reduce mercury emissions from power plants.

Former GOP operative explains why Republicans will use foreclosure lists to block voters

By Eartha Jane Melzer | 09.15.08 | 10:05 am
Cover: "How to Rig an Election" by Allen Raymond

Cover: "How to Rig an Election" by Allen Raymond

Last week we reported about Republican plans to use home foreclosure lists to block voters from the polls after James Carabelli, chair of the Macomb County Republican Party, told Michigan Messenger that on election day Republican volunteers will “have a list of foreclosed homes and make sure people aren’t voting from those addresses.”

Republican leaders have since disavowed plans to use foreclosure lists as part of their plan to challenge the eligibility of some voters, but an attorney for the party, Eric Doster, did confirm that the party would use returned mail to challenge voters based on residency. As veteran Republican activist Allen Raymond told Michigan Messenger in a recent interview, holding down Democratic turnout is a key part of Republican strategy for victory in November.

Raymond knows about Republican campaign tactics. For almost a decade he managed campaigns for Republicans running for state and national office. In the 2002 New Hampshire elections, he ran a phone-jamming operation aimed at blocking elderly people from arranging rides to the polls, an illegal action that he says was approved by the highest levels of the party. He spent three months in federal prison. Earlier this year, Raymond published a book about his life and work as a Republican operative, titled “Confessions of a Republican Operative: How to Rig an Election.”

As for our report that the Michigan GOP planned to use foreclosure lists to block likely Democratic voters, Raymond said: “It’s a very good tactic. It works.

“It is actually a very smart thing to do,” he went on, “particularly in this climate with so many foreclosures.”

For Republicans, he said, targeting the foreclosures would be a cost-effective and “probably” legal method of reducing Democratic votes.

If he were still in the election business, he said, “I’d be doing that all day long.”

Raymond explained how he would use foreclosure lists.

“You would go into certain geo-political areas and make a selection based on voter history and performance, and then what you would do is look for foreclosures within those geopolitical areas, and you would mail letters, and then those letters would come back and say that that person’s not there any more because their house has been foreclosed on, and they get challenged,” he said.

He explained why it makes sense for Republicans to seek to disqualify people who have lost their homes.

“If you look at who is being foreclosed upon, it is going to be sub-prime [borrowers]. Sub-prime [borrowers] are generally going to be low-income people, and low-income people are generally going to be Democratic voters.

“You got to remember this is a cost-per-contact business,” he explained. By targeting households in foreclosure, for the price of a letter and first-class postage, Republicans get a high rate of return, because people in foreclosure are very likely to move and to have their mail returned.

Raymond estimated that people might have moved out of as many as a third of homes listed as foreclosed. “That is a huge number,” he said, noting that people enduring the stress of foreclosure are not likely to think to change the address of their voter registration.

Raymond said that, barring some legislative action, Republicans will be free to challenge voters who’ve lost their homes.

“They will get challenged and they will get denied,” he said.

Raymond admitted the practice is not fair to people facing foreclosure.

“You can call them a victim or a bad business person in terms of their personal finances,” he said. “Whatever you call them, they still should have the right to vote.”

On Friday, the McCain campaign refused to meet with members of the Jobs with Justice campaign and the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, which came to deliver a letter opposing using foreclosure lists to challenge voters.

The McCain/Palin Great Lakes campaign headquarters is located in Farmington Hills in the Trott Financial Center. The law firm Trott & Trott specializes in representing banks in foreclosures. The office building is also home to Trott & Trott’s subsidiary American Processing Company, LLC, which uses proprietary software to provide mortgage default processing services nationwide.

Comments

  • Pingback: Lose your house Lose your vote « Suzie-Q

  • Pingback: Quotes of the Day » Boztopia.com

  • Pingback: Free Real Estate Blog » - Foreclosure News

  • Pingback: The Colorado Independent » Ex-GOP operative on using foreclosure lists to block voters: ‘It works’

  • Pingback: Bushtheidiot.com » Republicans To Block American Citizens From Voting

  • 1truepatriot

    If the Republican voting stance on people displaced due to mortgage foreclosures is taken to its logical conclusion, then those people (from mostly red states) that have been displaced due to Hurricane Ike who now have no house in which to reside would also have to be included in that stance. I am not condoning or endorsing such a decree, just pointing out what the Republicans themselves are purporting.

  • Pingback: Obama Camp Sues over Republican Plan to Block Voters in Michigan | Politicususa

  • Pingback: Voter Wars « Grab and Keel

  • Pingback: Lets steal an election | hell's handmaiden

  • Earl_E

    I would think many of the homes were 2nd homes, vacation retreats for the wealthiest few. So the republicans would not use the list of hurricane victims except in just the poorest counties, those least able to deal with the storm.

    At some point, the crap will hit the fan in this country, and if you think the streets of Bagdad were bad, read Lucifer's Hammer. A very old book but not to far from where this country may end up.

  • http://themichiganpartisan.blogspot.com/ pageiv

    Wouldn't the letters just be forwarded to the new address? I know a few people that've been forclosed on and non were sub-prime loans, and to add plently of poor do vote GOP.

    This guy is a hack.

  • nottalotta1025

    The letters sent to addresses with foreclosures would NOT be forwarded. This is a version of a voter-suppression tactic called “caging,” where “Do Not Forward” letters are sent to houses precisely so they will bounce. So, no, they will not be forwarded.

    Not-so-coincidentally, McCain adviser Phil Gramm pushed for the measures that de-regulated the mortgage and financial industries, which made possible the predatory lending practices that are driving the current foreclosure meltdown. McCain has positioned Gramm to be Treasury Secretary should he be elected. Is this who we need at the helm of the US Treasury?

  • imamom2

    Thank you, Ms. Melzer for your courage and skill in doing what we voters expect of our press. You are investigating and telling the truth to the American people-now while it counts-before the election. Bless you and all of your colleagues at the Michigan Messenger.

  • bumerry

    Nottlotta is absolutely right. The letters would not be forwarded in any case to those with forwarding addresses because bulk/business rate mail is not forwarded. Example – you lose all your catalogues and school mailings when you move, even with a forwarding addresses. As s/he pointed out, any letter saying “do not forward” is also not forwarded. And it is technicallly legal to send “do not forward” letters to anybody at all. Generally, only first class mail is forwarded anyway. Republicans have more money than we do, but with the percentage of foreclosures in the average Michigan county it might get pricey very fast.

  • chetlyzarko

    Your main “source” for this story is a guy who has a book-profit interest and spent time in federal prison (prosecuted during the Bush administration, nonetheless). Furthermore, the guy's language doesn't sound like he's knows the right “lingo” – for example, he uses the term “geo-political” when an expert would use the term demographic. Geo-political has an international relations sound to it, but even then it doesn't fit into that field. You quote Raymond “You got to”, suggesting he doesn't even have good command of English grammar. Hardly seems like a high-level operative to me.

    As to the accuracy of Carabelli's quote, I have no idea.

    • serendipitist

      “You quote Raymond “You got to”, suggesting he doesn't even have good command of English grammar. Hardly seems like a high-level operative to me.”

      Have you heard Bush address the public? Yet here he is, a high-level operative.

      • chetlyzarko

        I don't need to defend Bush to make the point that Raymond doesn't pass the smell test as an “expert” in the field of election analysis or the legal nuances of election challenges. If Karl Rove came off that way, you'd have a point. Regardless, my point doesn't hinge on the grammar as much as it does the lingo.

        • serendipitist

          Your “smell test” would indicate that we should doubt the fact that George Bush is the president of the US. After all, he forgot the proper name for the State of the Union Address… It appears that George Bush doesn't know the right lingo for his position.

          My point is this: your “smell test” doesn't pass my “smell test”.

          • chetlyzarko

            You just don't like me or my argument and don't want to believe it, so you attack my reasoning by pointing to another person who you assume I support (there many things with Bush I disagree upon) who is also not expert, but that has no relevance to Raymond. The two are unconnected. Bush could be the biggest moron in history and unworthy of the office — that doesn't make Raymond an expert in election knowledge or impact my arguments that he demonstrates lack of knowledge of key terms. It's not just “lingo” or “jargon” – but those are signs of expertise. “Demographics” is a pretty basic term, and “geo-political” is a wholly different term in another field (foreign relations).

          • serendipitist

            I have nothing personal against you. I can't say whether I like your or don't like you because I don't know you. I do, however, disagree with you.

            I don't care if you support Bush or not, that is not the point (I used him as an example because he is an easily recognizable figure). Are they really unconnected? I'm not saying that Raymond is automatically trustworthy because Bush is “the biggest moron in history”. I'm saying that Bush provides a good counterexample to your logic.

            Just because a person does not speak/write well does not mean he is not familiar with an issue. Perhaps that person is simply not an expert at communicating?

            All I am saying is that I am not ready to dismiss Raymond's claims simply because I disagree with his syntax. Like Rayne1 said, he was enough of an expert to be hired by the GOP.

            That said, I will agree to disagree. Good-bye and good luck!

          • chetlyzarko

            I wouldn't dismiss them entirely for these reasons either. On the other hand, I wouldn't accept them blindly either — he's trying to sell a book, and this tell-all angle has in the past proven to be prone to exaggeration by people on either side of the aisle.

        • Rayne1

          Raymond was enough of an expert for the Republican Party to use his services.

          If readers would like to make up their own minds about Raymond, they could view interviews with him at Velvet Revolution (here's one link to 4 videos: http://www.velvetrevolution.us/#012308 — there are at least 8 other videos at that site with Raymond).

  • serendipitist

    I have nothing personal against you. I can't say whether I like you or don't like you because I don't know you. I do, however, disagree with you.

    I don't care if you support Bush or not, that is not the point (I used him as an example because he is an easily recognizable figure). Are they really unconnected? I'm not saying that Raymond is automatically trustworthy because Bush is “the biggest moron in history”. I'm saying that Bush provides a good counterexample to your logic.

    Just because a person does not speak/write well does not mean he is not familiar with an issue. Perhaps that person is simply not an expert at communicating?

    All I am saying is that I am not ready to dismiss Raymond's claims simply because I disagree with his syntax. Like Rayne1 said, he was enough of an expert to be hired by the GOP.

    That said, I will agree to disagree. Good-bye and good luck!

  • http://www.outsidelansing.com chetlyzarko

    I wouldn't dismiss them entirely for these reasons either. On the other hand, I wouldn't accept them blindly either — he's trying to sell a book, and this tell-all angle has in the past proven to be prone to exaggeration by people on either side of the aisle.

  • http://www.outsidelansing.com chetlyzarko

    You just don't like me or my argument and don't want to believe it, so you attack my reasoning by pointing to another person who you assume I support (there many things with Bush I disagree upon) who is also not expert, but that has no relevance to Raymond. The two are unconnected. Bush could be the biggest moron in history and unworthy of the office — that doesn't make Raymond an expert in election knowledge or impact my arguments that he demonstrates lack of knowledge of key terms. It's not just “lingo” or “jargon” – but those are signs of expertise. “Demographics” is a pretty basic term, and “geo-political” is a wholly different term in another field (foreign relations).

  • Rayne1

    Raymond was enough of an expert for the Republican Party to use his services.

    If readers would like to make up their own minds about Raymond, they could view interviews with him at Velvet Revolution (here's one link to 4 videos: http://www.velvetrevolution.us/#012308 — there are at least 8 other videos at that site with Raymond).

  • serendipitist

    I have nothing personal against you. I can't say whether I like you or don't like you because I don't know you. I do, however, disagree with you.

    I don't care if you support Bush or not, that is not the point (I used him as an example because he is an easily recognizable figure). Are they really unconnected? I'm not saying that Raymond is automatically trustworthy because Bush is “the biggest moron in history”. I'm saying that Bush provides a good counterexample to your logic.

    Just because a person does not speak/write well does not mean he is not familiar with an issue. Perhaps that person is simply not an expert at communicating?

    All I am saying is that I am not ready to dismiss Raymond's claims simply because I disagree with his syntax. Like Rayne1 said, he was enough of an expert to be hired by the GOP.

    That said, I will agree to disagree. Good-bye and good luck!

  • http://www.outsidelansing.com chetlyzarko

    I wouldn't dismiss them entirely for these reasons either. On the other hand, I wouldn't accept them blindly either — he's trying to sell a book, and this tell-all angle has in the past proven to be prone to exaggeration by people on either side of the aisle.

  • Pingback: Lose your home. Lose your vote. « S t r e e t S c e n e