Top Stories

The Michigan Messenger going forward

By Staff Report | 11.16.11

I am writing today to announce the closure of the Michigan Messenger. After four years of operation in Michigan, the board of the American Independent News Network, has decided to shift publication of its news into a single site, The American Independent at Americanindependent.com. This is part of a shift in strategy, towards new forms [...]

Colorado-based abstinence program provided false and misleading information to Michigan students

HIV-AIDS-small
By Todd A. Heywood | 11.16.11

An abstinence-only presentation provided to numerous school districts in Calhoun and Eaton Counties in October of this year provided false and misleading information to students about HIV, experts allege.

Class action lawsuit filed against MERS over unpaid taxes

foreclosure
By Todd A. Heywood | 11.15.11

Two county registers of deeds filed a class action lawsuit Monday on behalf of Michigan’s 83 counties alleging that the Mortgage Electronic Registration Services owes millions of dollars in property title transfer taxes.

Schuette fights important mercury regulations

epa_logo
By Eartha Jane Melzer | 11.14.11

Despite evidence of the impact of mercury on children and public health, Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette last month joined with 24 other state attorneys general in filing a lawsuit to scuttle new EPA regulations that would reduce mercury emissions from power plants.

Lose your house, lose your vote

By Eartha Jane Melzer | 09.10.08 | 6:42 am

The chairman of the Republican Party in Macomb County, Michigan, a key swing county in a key swing state, is planning to use a list of foreclosed homes to block people from voting in the upcoming election as part of the state GOP’s effort to challenge some voters on Election Day.

“We will have a list of foreclosed homes and will make sure people aren’t voting from those addresses,” party chairman James Carabelli told Michigan Messenger in a telephone interview earlier this week. He said the local party wanted to make sure that proper electoral procedures were followed.

State election rules allow parties to assign “election challengers” to polls to monitor the election. In addition to observing the poll workers, these volunteers can challenge the eligibility of any voter provided they “have a good reason to believe” that the person is not eligible to vote. One allowable reason is that the person is not a “true resident of the city or township.”

The Michigan Republicans’ planned use of foreclosure lists is apparently an attempt to challenge ineligible voters as not being “true residents.”

One expert questioned the legality of the tactic.

“You can’t challenge people without a factual basis for doing so,” said J. Gerald Hebert, a former voting rights litigator for the U.S. Justice Department who now runs the Campaign Legal Center, a Washington D.C.-based public-interest law firm. “I don’t think a foreclosure notice is sufficient basis for a challenge, because people often remain in their homes after foreclosure begins and sometimes are able to negotiate and refinance.”

As for the practice of challenging the right to vote of foreclosed property owners, Hebert called it, “mean-spirited.”

GOP ties to state’s largest foreclosure law firm

The Macomb GOP’s plans are another indication of how John McCain’s campaign stands to benefit from the burgeoning number of foreclosures in the state. McCain’s regional headquarters are housed in the office building of foreclosure specialists Trott & Trott. The firm’s founder, David A. Trott, has raised between $100,000 and $250,000 for the Republican nominee.

The Macomb County party’s plans to challenge voters who have defaulted on their house payments is likely to disproportionately affect African-Americans who are overwhelmingly Democratic voters. More than 60 percent of all sub-prime loans — the most likely kind of loan to go into default — were made to African-Americans in Michigan, according to a report issued last year by the state’s Department of Labor and Economic Growth.

Challenges to would-be voters

Statewide, the Republican Party is gearing up for a comprehensive voter challenge campaign, according to Denise Graves, party chair for Republicans in Genessee County, which encompasses Flint. The party is creating a spreadsheet of election challenger volunteers and expects to coordinate a training with the regional McCain campaign, Graves said in an interview with Michigan Messenger.

Whether the Republicans will challenge voters with foreclosed homes elsewhere in the state is not known.

Kelly Harrigan, deputy director of the GOP’s voter programs, confirmed that she is coordinating the group’s “election integrity” program. Harrigan said the effort includes putting in place a legal team, as well as training election challengers. She said the challenges to voters were procedural rather than personal. She referred inquiries about the vote challenge program to communications director Bill Nowling, who promised information but did not return calls.

Party chairman Carabelli said that the Republican Party is training election challengers to “make sure that [voters] are who they say who they are.”

When asked for further details on how Republicans are compiling challenge lists, he said, “I would rather not tell you all the things we are doing.”

Vote suppression: Not an isolated effort

The issue of voter challenges is arising around the country. In Ohio, the Columbus Dispatch, in an July 6 article titled “Foreclosed-on voters using old addresses could snag election,” reported that Doug Preisse, a member of the board of elections in Franklin County and the chair of the local GOP, said he has not ruled out challenging voters before the election. 

Hebert, the voting-rights lawyer, sees a pattern.

“At a minimum what you are seeing is a fairly comprehensive effort by the Republican Party, a systematic broad-based effort to put up obstacles for people to vote,” he said. “Nobody is contending that these people are not legally registered to vote.

“When you are comprehensively challenging people to vote,” Hebert went on, “your goals are two-fold: One is you are trying to knock people out from casting ballots; the other is to create a slowdown that will discourage others,” who see a long line and realize they can’t afford to stay and wait.

Challenging all voters registered to foreclosed homes could disrupt some polling places, especially in the Detroit metropolitan area. According to the real estate Web site RealtyTrac, one in every 176 households in Wayne County, metropolitan Detroit, received a foreclosure filing during the month of July. In Macomb County, the figure was one household in every 285, meaning that 1,834 homeowners received the bad news in just one month. The Macomb County foreclosure rate puts it in the top three percent of all U.S. counties in the number of distressed homeowners.

Wayne, Oakland, Macomb, Kent and Genessee counties were — in that order — the counties with the most homeowners facing foreclosure, according to RealtyTrac. As of July, there were more than 62,000 foreclosure filings in the entire state.

Joe Rozell, director of elections for Oakland County in suburban Detroit, acknowledged that challenges such as those described by Carabelli are allowed by law but said they have the potential to create long lines and disrupt the voting process. With 890,000 potential voters closely divided between Democratic and Republican, Oakland County is a key swing county of this swing state.

According to voter challenge directives handed down by Republican Secretary of State Terri Lynn Land, voter challenges need only be “based on information obtained through a reliable source or means.”

“But poll workers are not allowed to ask the reason” for the challenges, Rozell said. In other words, Republican vote challengers are free to use foreclosure lists as a basis for disqualifying otherwise eligible voters.

David Lagstein, head organizer with the Michigan Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN), described the plans of the Macomb GOP as “crazy.”

“You would think they would think, ‘This is going to look too heartless,’” said Lagstein, whose group has registered 200,000 new voters statewide this year and also runs a foreclosure avoidance program. “The Republican-led state Senate has not moved on the anti-predatory lending bill for over a year and yet [Republicans] have time to prey on those who have fallen victim to foreclosure to suppress the vote.”

—-

Correction: This article has been amended to reflect the fact that Doug Preisse informed Michigan Messenger that he did not “state or imply” that he had not ruled out challenges “due to foreclosure related address issues,” as originally reported.

Comments

  • Pingback: Father Time and Mother Nutter « Otherworld Lounge

  • Anonymous
  • donmate

    Maybe you can't get into the details here, but I was wondering if your reporter recorded the interview?

  • Shortcircuit28

    Michigan Election Law, regarding address changes:

    As in 168.507:
    “(1) A registered elector who has removed from 1 election precinct of a township, city, or village to another election precinct of the same township, city, or village and has not recorded the removal with the local clerk shall execute a transfer of registration request, …”

    -essentially, you have to process the change of address.

    HOWEVER, as of

    (2) “….It is not necessary for the elector to change his or her registration to reflect the change in order to be eligible to vote.”

    In essence, while it does state that you must file a change of address, IT DOES NOT HAVE TO GO THROUGH BEFORE THE ELECTION in order for the person to be eligible. The “tactic” whatever anyone wishes to call it, is bogus and should not effect ANYONE's eligibility to vote. So let them waste their money, they will just get thrown out of court :-)

  • Montely

    Heywood sounds like a member of the Michigan Messenger, but anyway, an address on a list that is generate from foreclosure filings and not actual foreclosures does not prove that a person does not reside at the address in question as stated in the article. There are laws that prevent individuals and organizations from blocking someone from voting based on non-factual information and those that breal these laws run the risk of being in viloation of a few civil rights laws. Me, I would have that person blocking me from voting without absolute, undenialbe proof, arrested on the spot. A large picture, and should that civil rights groups should like at immediately involves going after Trott & Trott and the local GOP for poll tampering if at all possible.

  • dbigwood

    I'll believe this is a group of concerned impartial citizens when they also get a list of those with more than one piece of property and challange them. Isn't it likely that people in that group could register under both residences, or all 10 of them? Seems like something to be concerned about to me. Until that time it just looks like a tactic to disenfranchise folks.

  • Pingback: Elizabeth DiNovella Online » Will Michigan be this year’s Florida?

  • Pingback: Voter Suppression: Lose your House, Lose your Vote? - U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum

  • Pingback: BLACK ENTERPRISE Politics » Blog Archive » Protecting the Right to Vote

  • andibump

    All this political underhandedness is making me sick. The fact remains that some of our politicians are heartless. If you have to go to these measures to stop the democratic vote, something is dreadfully wrong. If something like this happens, all I can say is God does not like ugly. Carabelli will have to face the wrongs of his ways. You may think that you can get away with treating people bad, but it comes back on you even harder. It's bad enough that some of these people may lose their homes in the long run, but to be turned away from the polls is outrageous. I hope he can sleep at night, and that he don't one day have to face foreclosure himself. What right do he have to invade peoples privacy? Our government has really gotten out of control.

  • Pingback: Are You Scared, Democrats? You Should Be. « Political Mpressions

  • angryalaskan

    what happened to our America? Palin for VP she is not qualified, McCain is one of the Keating 5. The connections are all there another election is getting frittered away and worse yet stolen. as an Alaskan I am greatly concerned to hear about our fellow US citizens of Michigan being robbed of their voices. The media here in AK is attempting to stifle the many of us who reject our Governor's place on the Republican ticket, yet the media here says nothing. I am ready to scream, I am ready to protest, I am ready to stand up with my brothers and sisters in Michigan and say enough is enough!

  • toya609

    What kind of crap is this?? So what is going to be done about all of those that get evicted from an apartment or any form of rental property??? This is discrimination!! The GOP can't possibly be that ignorant!!!!

  • Pingback: occasional fish » Again more various

  • liamartin003

    Foreclosure proceedings DO NOT necessitate the loss of a home. You can have proceedings begin and STILL live in and even keep your house. This is ridiculous. A lot of people have been late on their mortgages lately and have caught up. Happens all of the time. No one has batted an eye in the past. This is really sick and this is supposed to be the moral party. These are the most twisted morals I have ever witnessed.

  • Pingback: Well, dammit. - PoliticalGroove Forums

  • Pingback: Chelsea Green » Blog Archive » Theft of Election Already Underway

  • Pingback: Republicans Already Working at Voter Suppression « 4&20 blackbirds

  • Pingback: Voter Suppression Efforts 2008 « Bademus’s Weblog

  • Pingback: Please tell me this is not true! « Bright Light Warrior Nika

  • Pingback: Obama campaign files suit over “voter-foreclosure” plans « Through The Static

  • Pingback: Election FRAUD Alert: Republicans Are Preparing To RIG ‘08 Elections | PoliticalArticles.NET

  • Pingback: Lose Your House, Lose Your Vote - Rap GodFathers Community

  • Pingback: Presidentgezocht.nl » Blog Archive » Lose your house, lose your vote

  • Pingback: Foreclosed Vote: No Home, No Vote. « Ask Aimee

  • Pingback: Lose Your Home… Lose Your Vote? | The Kaos Effect

  • Pingback: First your home and then your vote. « Kasalina’s Weblog

  • Diebluma

    This is an outrage!!! A down right outrage!!! Blocking voting is a terrible nasty cheating thing of the Republicans to do! They did it last election in several states for many made up or false reasons. I can't believe I live in this country, slowly we are turning into what we never wanted in the first place which is controlling and fascist and its all because the Republican party wants to take away our constitutional rights!!! They would want the Wealthy Fat Cats at the top to get even wealthier while the majority of Americans, working class people get stupider, lose all of their rights, and have nothing left but the military and god. There should be protesting and riots in the streets. France's citizens always prove their point and the government is afraid of them because over there it's a true democracy where the people have a choice which is what it's supposed to be like over here. If those citizens don't get what they need then they revolt. This whole thing upsets and enrages me and makes Canada look more and more inviting to me by the minute.

  • http://africanamericanpoliticalpundit.com aappundit

    Thank You for bringing this important topic to the nations attention. I have also posted on this issue on my blog. http://africanamericanpoliticalpundit.com/showD…

  • Pingback: Lose your house, lose your vote - It Factor Entertainment

  • Pingback: ImpeachmentWatch Day 100 (2008-09-17) « Impeachmentwatch

  • Pingback: Liminal states » A wiki, saving democracy?

  • damien1980

    What they are saying is make sure all your informaiton on your voters registration is correct. I noticed my birthdate was incorrect, DVM corrected the matter immediately. Incorrect informaiton on voters registration will disqualify your vote. Please check and update all information on your voters registration.

  • stinker

    Will they be barring the folks in Galveston who lost their homes to Ike from voting next? Oh, probably not, that's a RED state! What an insult to the working folks who lost their homes, but still pay to bail out the banks and Wall Street. It's like the Poll Tax. America is going backwards.

    • http://madhousewifesdiary.blogspot.com/ ckmunson

      That is a good point you bring up, one will have to wait and see. I get that we have to have voting rules, but this is very hard to wrap my head around. Its an admission that as a party, they are willing to do what is necessary to win at all costs. Shameful.

  • kc666

    this is an out rage!

  • stinker

    The Republicans got away with a very similar strategy in Florida the last two times–voters names could not be found or they were erroneously listed as felons or the polling places closed early. By the time the dust cleared, it was too late; election over! Don't think they can't get away with this or would never try such a travesty of justice. They have and will again. And the ironic thing is they get away with it and the middle and lower classes keep cheering them on as if they were being represented! Unbelievable!

  • kc666

    the erroneous plans need to be stop. we have to get out there and get more people to vote.

  • MamaD

    Is this sinking to a new low….sorry, your house is gone…..sorry, your vote doesn't count….maybe this isn't a NEW low….just another low blow to people without a voice. For crying out loud! How can the Republicans think this is remotely ok to do this? They're the ones constantly talking about living life with a “moral compass.” Baloney! What Chutzpa! I hope everybody hears about this one….it'll be President Obama come January, for sure! And hooray to that!

  • pbehan

    That is really low, but not surprising. I think the best strategy to defeat this ugly effort would be to publicize it and encourage anyone likely to be on a foreclosure list to vote early or vote absentee. That will give voters warning, so they aren't taken by surprise, can take lots of documents along to show they still live there, and won't allow the Republicans to slow down the lines for other voters on election day. The local Democratic Party headquarters should also make legal information and knowledgeable supporters available to such voters, in case they are challenged at the early/absentee stage.

  • Kimmyoung

    This is sinking. These people have already lose their homes and now they are trying to take away their rights. What kind of country and people have we become. This is the time we need to come together and make a change. Shame on the Republicans! The Democratic Party needs to get together and stop this insanity.

  • alscheck

    These people behind this move should be tried in a court of law, convicted and put in prison. This is the most unamerican thing I have ever seen, save the awful efforts they went through in the south after the civil war to stop blacks from voting. I'm a white man 72 years old and I am ashamed of some people in this country for even thinking of something like this. Thankyou God for helping us get this far towards equality, but this takes the cake. When I was in Korea, there were no blacks and whites when we faced an enemy, there were just Americans and we all stuck together. Even a southern boy would have said that, and at the time they were still keeping the blacks segregated, but they fought along side of us.

  • Pingback: Rove tricks? McCain absentee ballots raise questions - Tech Support Forums - TechIMO.com

  • tarshaone

    What can be done about this issue and how can it be stopped? It's enough to talk about the issue and make sure they wont try this in other states as well!

  • Pingback: ImpeachmentWatch Day 101 (2008-09-18) « Impeachmentwatch

  • Pingback: DogSolitude » Blog Archive » Lose your house, lose your vote

  • Pingback: More Caging Reports « One Pretentious Bastard

  • leader52

    This story is completely false. I have spoken with the Macomb county Republican Committee and they have categorically denied ever making such statements. I would contact Ms. Melzer but this “progressive” media lists no contact number to challenge them.

  • Pingback: A call to action for Election Day

  • tater

    bottom line: these foreclosures would not have happened if our economy was in better shape – thanks to the bush administration.

  • Pingback: ImpeachmentWatch Day 102 (2008-09-19) « Impeachmentwatch