Top Stories

The Michigan Messenger going forward

By Staff Report | 11.16.11

I am writing today to announce the closure of the Michigan Messenger. After four years of operation in Michigan, the board of the American Independent News Network, has decided to shift publication of its news into a single site, The American Independent at Americanindependent.com. This is part of a shift in strategy, towards new forms [...]

Colorado-based abstinence program provided false and misleading information to Michigan students

HIV-AIDS-small
By Todd A. Heywood | 11.16.11

An abstinence-only presentation provided to numerous school districts in Calhoun and Eaton Counties in October of this year provided false and misleading information to students about HIV, experts allege.

Class action lawsuit filed against MERS over unpaid taxes

foreclosure
By Todd A. Heywood | 11.15.11

Two county registers of deeds filed a class action lawsuit Monday on behalf of Michigan’s 83 counties alleging that the Mortgage Electronic Registration Services owes millions of dollars in property title transfer taxes.

Schuette fights important mercury regulations

epa_logo
By Eartha Jane Melzer | 11.14.11

Despite evidence of the impact of mercury on children and public health, Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette last month joined with 24 other state attorneys general in filing a lawsuit to scuttle new EPA regulations that would reduce mercury emissions from power plants.

Alaskans unhappy with Palin bridge lie

By Ed Brayton | 09.10.08 | 6:38 am

Some of the folks in Ketchikan, Alaska — the city that the now infamous “Bridge to Nowhere” was to connect to Gravina Island — are not happy with Sarah Palin’s frequent lies about the issue. Ketchikan Mayor Bob Weinstein told Reuters that Palin is playing political games with the bridge:

“People are learning that she pandered to us by saying, I’m for this’ … and then when she found it was politically advantageous for her nationally, abruptly she starts using the very term that she said was insulting,” Weinstein said.

During her 2006 campaign for governor, Palin was an enthusiastic supporter of the bridge project and praised the Alaskan congressional delegation for securing federal funds for it. Mike Elerding, Palin’s campaign coordinator in Ketchikan, even told Reuters that she said she was offended at the moniker “Bridge to Nowhere.”

While she now claims that she turned down the money for the bridge and told Congress that if Alaska wanted a bridge they would pay for it themselves, the statement she made when canceling the project said that the reason it was canceled was because Congress had “little interest in spending any more money on a bridge between Ketchikan and Gravina Island.” Yet another Republican official in Alaska blasted that kind of double talk:

Former state House Speaker Gail Phillips, a Republican who represented the Kenai Peninsula city of Homer, is also critical about Palin’s reversal on the bridge issue.

“You don’t tell a group of Alaskans you support something and then go to someplace else and say you oppose it,” said Phillips, who supported Palin’s opponent, Democrat Tony Knowles, in the 2006 gubernatorial race.

Palin’s statement about the cancellation of the project even said that public opposition was based on “inaccurate portrayals” of the project. Now she has not only joined the chorus in offering those portrayals, she’s decided to lie and claim that she told Congress she didn’t want the money she enthusiastically pursued before. Sounds like the perfect bridge to park the “Straight Talk Express.”

Comments

  • ajamo

    Why do people lie when the truth would fit.
    I have read where Alaska had a surpluse of monies and it was given to the people of Alaska, while we the tax payers of the United State are supplying them with more monies.
    Palin is just like Bush, he gave money away that the treasury had in the black and now we are in the Red under him. She did the same.

  • Michael_Heath

    What's even worse, is that Gov. Palin accepted the money for the bridges from the federal government:

    http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/gop_con…

    While Gov. Palin had every legal right to do so; I find it disengenuous to accept the funds while railing against such projects. From a taxpayer perspective, this is even worse than lying about it since the money gets burned with no federal oversight.

    • witness

      Did you think they would do anything different. John McCain could not answer the question concerning if Palin was the best person to deal with the international and world conflicts we are dealing with. He was very unconfortable and decided to talk about the paper pipe line she brought to Alaska. Which is a lie. The pipe line is non exhistent and will not be built if ever, Also Alaska only supplies 3,5 percent of natural not the 20 percent that she constantly harps on. (A paper pipe line is like a paper street that the city trys to get a homeowner to pave when they are building a new home. It does not exhist in reality just on paper.

  • uncleavi

    Hello Michigan,
    I live in Alaska and grew up in Traverse City and want to tell you about the bridge.
    Picture having about 10K people living in St. Ignace and having your local Airport being in Mackinaw City. Now, take away the bridge and have a ferry taking a couple of thousand folks to and from said airport. It is super slow and inconveniant. That is what the bridge to nowhere really is.
    Be against it but, kno w what it is really for.
    Thank You

    • Kwaayesnama

      CNN recently showed the road to nowhere that Sarah Palin used the taxpayer’s dollars to build.
      It is a dead end street with absolutely no traffic on it. So when she said no thanks to your bridge she did not give the money back to the government as she insinuated. She used the funds to build a road to nowhere. I would love to know why she chose to build this particular unneeded road?

      • uncleavi

        I can't stand our Governor here in Alaska!
        I suppose that no matter what we do here is going to make folks unhappy somewhere .
        Perhaps we can get a Governer as good as Granholm and really get our economy going like back in my sainted homeland of Michigan.

  • JEShelly

    This was a Porkbarrel Boondoggle!
    The poll, conducted by Hays Research of Anchorage, found that 71% of Alaskans were opposed to construction of the Gravina Access Highway under current conditions. In Ketchikan, the opposition was even stronger at 75%.
    http://www.tongassconservation.org/gravina.html
    With the exception of the Ketchikan Airport, this small nearly undeveloped island is one of few islands in Southern Alaska to remain virtually untouched. Gravina Island is also what every Ketchikan resident views every day. …This Gravina Access Highway project, according to the Alaska Department of Transportation, was contracted out at a cost of $25.7 miilion on December 1, 2006. For this price we get 3.2 miles of road. That equates to about $8 million per mile. …Gravina Island is occupied by 50 people in 15 families. Many of these folks live there because the island has few roads. Alaska's former Governor Frank Murkowski has 33-acres of family owned land just south of Clam Cove on Gravina Island.

  • Kwaayesnama

    CNN recently showed the road to nowhere that Sarah Palin used the taxpayer’s dollars to build. It is a dead end street with absolutely no traffic on it. So when she said no thanks to your bridge she did not give the money back to the government as she insinuated. She used the funds to build a road to nowhere. I would love to know why she chose to build this particular unneeded road?

  • uncleavi

    I can't stand our Governor here in Alaska!
    I suppose that no matter what we do here is going to make folks unhappy somewhere .
    Perhaps we can get a Governer as good as Granholm and really get our economy going like back in my sainted homeland of Michigan.

  • Kwaayesnama

    CNN recently showed the road to nowhere that Sarah Palin used the taxpayer’s dollars to build. It is a dead end street with absolutely no traffic on it. So when she said no thanks to your bridge she did not give the money back to the government as she insinuated. She used the funds to build a road to nowhere. I would love to know why she chose to build this particular unneeded road?

  • uncleavi

    I can't stand our Governor here in Alaska!
    I suppose that no matter what we do here is going to make folks unhappy somewhere .
    Perhaps we can get a Governer as good as Granholm and really get our economy going like back in my sainted homeland of Michigan.