Attorney General Mike Cox, a candidate for the Republican nomination for governor, said Monday that he intends to file a brief in support of the state of Arizona in the lawsuit filed by the federal government to strike down a controversial new immigration law in that state.
It’s not unusual for state attorneys general to file briefs in cases involving other states because those suits often involve legal principles that could apply to actions taken by their own states.
But could this suit be more about political advantage than legal principle? As political observers have noted in previous articles about attempts to adopt a clone of that Arizona law, Republican politicians in the state are clearly looking to harness the current anti-immigrant fervor to score points with party delegates and voters in the primaries.
The legislation adopted in Arizona compels police officers to demand proof of residency or citizenship whenever there is a “reasonable suspicion” that someone might be in the country illegally. Opposition to the law has come not only from civil rights groups and advocates for minorities but also from police organizations, who fear that the law puts police officers in a difficult position in relation to minority communities.