Top Stories

The Michigan Messenger going forward

By Staff Report | 11.16.11

I am writing today to announce the closure of the Michigan Messenger. After four years of operation in Michigan, the board of the American Independent News Network, has decided to shift publication of its news into a single site, The American Independent at Americanindependent.com. This is part of a shift in strategy, towards new forms [...]

Colorado-based abstinence program provided false and misleading information to Michigan students

HIV-AIDS-small
By Todd A. Heywood | 11.16.11

An abstinence-only presentation provided to numerous school districts in Calhoun and Eaton Counties in October of this year provided false and misleading information to students about HIV, experts allege.

Class action lawsuit filed against MERS over unpaid taxes

foreclosure
By Todd A. Heywood | 11.15.11

Two county registers of deeds filed a class action lawsuit Monday on behalf of Michigan’s 83 counties alleging that the Mortgage Electronic Registration Services owes millions of dollars in property title transfer taxes.

Schuette fights important mercury regulations

epa_logo
By Eartha Jane Melzer | 11.14.11

Despite evidence of the impact of mercury on children and public health, Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette last month joined with 24 other state attorneys general in filing a lawsuit to scuttle new EPA regulations that would reduce mercury emissions from power plants.

Republicans campaign on Arizona-style immigration reform

By Eartha Jane Melzer | 06.18.10 | 10:27 am

Congressional candidate Jason Allen and Secretary of State candidates State Sens. Michelle McManus (R-Lake Leelanau) and Cameron Brown (R-Sturgis) are sponsors of a Senate bill that would enact Arizona-style immigration reforms in Michigan.

The Immigration Law Enforcement Act, SB1388, and its companion House bill 6256 would require all police to enforce federal immigration laws and require them to request immigration papers from anyone they suspect of being in the county illegally.

According to Emily Carney, legislative director for McManus, the law mirrors legislation recently enacted in Arizona.

That law has prompted protests, boycotts and legal challenges by groups who claim it is unfair and will promote racial profiling.

Carney said that the McManus office has received e-mails and phone calls with positive feedback about the bill.

Jeremy Hendges, spokesman for Jason Allen’s congressional campaign, described the candidate’s take on immigration policy this way:

“From the national security angle, we need to make sure we are not letting in drug dealers, human traffickers, and terrorists. People who are coming here and not working legally — they are not paying in to tax system they should not be expecting to be using all these benefits without paying in the system that you and I pay into.”

Hendges acknowledged that Michigan does not have a serious problem with illegal immigration.

“Look at the southern border,” he said. “We’ve been fortunate in Michigan that we haven’t had a lot of trouble.”

Hendges said that while people do sometimes mention immigration on the campaign trail, “the number one issue hands down is jobs and the economy.”

Critics say that the immigration legislation backed by the term-limited state senator will actually harm the state’s damaged economy by creating a social climate that is hostile to all immigrants.

Susan E. Reed, staff attorney for the Michigan Poverty Law Program’s Michigan Immigrant Rights Project, said that those who are worried about illegal immigrants using state services are not considering the full impact of immigrants on the state economy.

“Undocumented immigrants also pay taxes and contribute to the economy with their labor, in some cases subsidizing and sustaining whole industries (consider Michigan agriculture),“ she said. “A big picture view shows us that that the foreign born (documented and undocumented) are some of the only good news in Michigan’s rusting, graying economy/work force, and that legislation that targets immigrants is generally unwelcoming.”

A recent study on the economic impact of immigrants on Michigan’s economy — funded by the New Economy Initiative, the Detroit Regional Chamber of Commerce, and the Skillman Foundation — found that “southeast Michigan’s foreign born residents provide enormous contributions to the region’s economic growth and will play a key role in our economic future.”

… the U.S. Small Business Administration indicates that 15.8 percent of all Michigan businesses started between 1996 and 2007 were started by an immigrant. In 2000, these businesses produced over $1.5 billion in annual business income. Michigan’s foreign born were more than three times as likely as non-immigrants to start a new business during this time.

The study suggested that Michigan should make attracting and retaining immigrants part of its economic recovery strategy and recommended the state take steps to make immigration regulations easier to navigate and explore ways of convincing the many foreign born students at Michigan colleges and universities to stay in the state after they graduate.

Besides harming the state’s economy by making it less attractive to immigrants, Reed said that the bill could have a negative impact on public safety by causing more people to avoid police.

“It is unproductive for police to be identified with immigration law enforcement,“ she said. “It makes victims and witnesses fearful and less likely to report violent crime.”

Reed said that people who are in the country legally may avoid contact with police if they fear that friends or neighbors may be caught up in immigration law enforcement.

Tom Hendrickson of the Michigan Association of Chiefs of Police told Michigan Messenger that the legislation is likely to be viewed with skepticism by law enforcement in the state.

“I can’t see law enforcement in Michigan being receptive,” Hendrickson said. “Law enforcement is very sensitive to any type of racial profiling situation that might be encouraged … Legislation such as Arizona’s exasperates the whole situation as some provisions allow for, calls for racial profiling.”

Observers from across the political spectrum agree that the measure is unproductive as policy but say that it could win support for the Republican campaigns.

Wayne State University professor and political columnist Jack Lessenberry says the legislation is “immigrant bashing” and “silly” and that Michigan should instead be encouraging immigration as a way to increase the population and rebuild the economy.

Bill Ballenger, former Republican state senator and editor of Inside Michigan Politics, says that it may be a smart move politically regardless of the policy’s effectiveness.

“Jack Lessenberry is probably correct intellectually,” he said, “but politically he’s on the losing side on this one.”

Ballenger said that support for the legislation would help the candidates in a Republican primary or Republican convention and will probably help them against Democrats with more moderate immigration positions in a general election.

Lessenberry agrees. Asked how Allen’s immigrant position would affect his chances in the congressional election Lessenberry said, “It may well help him, because the vast majority of the population is woefully ignorant.”

Comments

  • http://twitter.com/MuddleVanHeck MuddleVanHeck

    Two things:

    1. There's a HUGE difference between 'illegal immigrants' and 'legal immigrants.' Anyone who still tries to blur that distinction is a moron, and basically thinks the rest of us are idiots too.

    2. “illegal [sic] immigrants only pay the taxes that the same displaced American worker would pay. Nothing more, nothing less. There is absolutely no benefit to the economy whatsoever.

    • Anonymous

      You really have no idea what you are talking about, but you don’t. Look at the facts, “undocumented” immigrants don’t even take jobs from Americans, they do not belong to the same labor niche. If they come here is because there is a demand for foreign labor. People here are too spoiled to work in the farms, or work in the service sector period. There are laws in most states that force employers to look for native workers for a period of 90 days before soliciting foreign workers, the truth of the matter is that many employers have no choice but to hire immigrants, especially undocumented since the guest workers programs are insufficient to make up for the scarcity of labor in the country.

      If undocumented immigrants left to day, this country would be paralyzed, and the government knows that, do you think that they would not have kicked everybody out if they really didnt believe so? come one get real! They only keep this issue alive to always have a scapegoat whenever they screw up and cripple the economy.. I wont waste my time trying to convince you, just get your facts right and then make up you mind. thank you

  • http://twitter.com/MuddleVanHeck MuddleVanHeck

    Good for you, Michiganders! Keep the heat on. Let 'em boycott…pretty soon, they'll have boycotted the entire nation. The American people are FED UP.

  • Irish_Wake

    I see no benefit in passing laws that do little to help our country other than keep Ms. VanHeck happy. While jingoistic rhetoric is self-satisfying, it is rarely illuminating. Or substantial.

    I suggest Michigan 'grease the skids' for foreign engineers and skilled workers that wish to work in regional industries. Increasing local talent value (who are proud and grateful) will raise, wages, tax revenues, and wisdom.

  • Left_Coast_Steve

    Yeah, all those Canucks trying to sneak across the border and get those good Detroit jobs … uh-huh.

  • http://twitter.com/MuddleVanHeck MuddleVanHeck

    Mr Irish Wake doesn't seem to have his thumb on the pulse of MOST American's sentiments.

    Out of touch, perhaps. Or simply an elitist, sheltered from the violence, automatic weapons and drugs coming across the border? Or is it because wages haven't been diluted quite enough just yet to make him feel superior to everyone else?

    By the way, I agree on increasing talented, educated immigrants. Thing is, they all come here LEGALLY.

    • Irish_Wake

      I apologize for the misunderstanding. Perhaps my wording was unclear.

      The United States is a Republic. As such, the legal system is designed to administer justice, not deliver whatever the winds of popular thought blow under the door. Any law that only reiterates a previous law, or makes previously illegal activity illegal, is redundant, extraneous, and only exists to make its supporters feel good.

      An elitist? Me? Of course I am. I am an American. I do not call someone who disagrees with me out of touch, sheltered, or wishing poverty on the masses. This name calling (ad homonym attacks for you elitists) has nothing to do with the merits of the ideas put forth for discussion.

      I do prefer well thought-out plans aligned toward a worthy goal – such as the possible (increasing our brain trust to carry us toward a better future), as opposed to the impossible (trying to keep out a group that has not been deterred since 1492).

      If I may ask, why have the creators of credit default swaps, who are known to have financially brought this country to its knees, not been brought to justice in Arizona? Why are people looking for a better life for their children vilified? I know illegal immigration is a punishable offense, but this seems…if I may borrow your phrase…elitist.

      • http://twitter.com/MuddleVanHeck MuddleVanHeck

        How kind of you to apologize, but I am quite sure there was no misunderstanding here.

        While I appreciate your “Utopian” views, as well as dismiss them for being cute, but only in a 17 yr. old sort of way, this conversation is not about those wishing to better their lives. OF COURSE they do. Doesn't everybody?

        In case you missed it, we're broke, as in “No mon, no fun.” Money doesn't grow on trees. Jobs are few and far between. Furthermore, we have immigration laws for a reason. It is to regulate the flow of immigration according to current economic trends. It is also to make sure that we know who is coming here…you know, screening folks and such.

        Even though folks such as yourself like to complain about the banks, you seldom seem to ask the obvious questions, like why are we spending $200B on a war for the sake of securing the nation, but haven't even bothered to secure our borders? According to the DHS, 52,000 OTMs (other than Mexicans) were apprehended last year trying to come across into the U.S. These folks were from countries such as Egypt, Jordan, Syria, Yemen, and Iran.

        As an aside, I'd like to throw in that I find it repulsive when someone complains about corporate banking greed, and then puts his foot in his mouth to support 21st century slavery for *drum roll, please* “corporate greed.

        Listen to yourself, and then as you so eloquently pointed out, try to remember that as a Republic, we demand representative government. We don't do “elitism” very well at all.

        • Irish_Wake

          You misrepresent my views and beliefs. Repeatedly.
          Then address your story rather than the issues. Poorly.

          You suggest I argue against restricting immigration. Then heap scorn on this idea. Since the assertion is false, and the data used to flesh out the assertions is off-topic, I will ignore them.

          I support a coherent immigration policy, and laws that support these policies. Using laws and procedures in existence at the time, law enforcement could have apprehended the 9/11 hijackers and deported them before they could complete their task. I clearly stated my opposition to creating redundant laws that supporters such as Rep. Steve King (R-IA) say include using a “sixth sense”. I find little comfort in fictional arguments or mind reading.

          Your aside is also fictional. I did not mention banks in any way, shape, or form. I did specify one financial instrument that socialized risk, manipulated standing laws, and polluted the financial system. Your contention that I support slavery to corporate greed is a lie at best.

  • Chris_Vreeland

    Go ahead and pass the legislation. Attorneys need work and the tax payers of Michigan can foot the bill for at least two sets of attorneys when the legislation is found to be unconstitutional. At a minimum, we might want to wait until the outcome of the Arizona lawsuits to see if we really want to pass similar legislation just to pay attorney fees to the ACLU. Anybody out there check the final bill for multiple sets of attorneys paid by California for successful challenges to Prop 187 (the original granddaddy of the Arizona law)?

    As an ACLU supporter, I would appreciate the donation but as a Michigan taxpayer I am skeptical that this legislation is anything but political pandering to some rather loathsome traits of humanity. However, bashing the recently arrived among us is as American as apple pie and divorce. Long live the USA! Beat Algeria!