Top Stories

The Michigan Messenger going forward

By Staff Report | 11.16.11

I am writing today to announce the closure of the Michigan Messenger. After four years of operation in Michigan, the board of the American Independent News Network, has decided to shift publication of its news into a single site, The American Independent at Americanindependent.com. This is part of a shift in strategy, towards new forms [...]

Colorado-based abstinence program provided false and misleading information to Michigan students

HIV-AIDS-small
By Todd A. Heywood | 11.16.11

An abstinence-only presentation provided to numerous school districts in Calhoun and Eaton Counties in October of this year provided false and misleading information to students about HIV, experts allege.

Class action lawsuit filed against MERS over unpaid taxes

foreclosure
By Todd A. Heywood | 11.15.11

Two county registers of deeds filed a class action lawsuit Monday on behalf of Michigan’s 83 counties alleging that the Mortgage Electronic Registration Services owes millions of dollars in property title transfer taxes.

Schuette fights important mercury regulations

epa_logo
By Eartha Jane Melzer | 11.14.11

Despite evidence of the impact of mercury on children and public health, Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette last month joined with 24 other state attorneys general in filing a lawsuit to scuttle new EPA regulations that would reduce mercury emissions from power plants.

DOJ loosens requirements for sex offender registry changes

By Ed Brayton | 05.17.10 | 10:17 am

As Michigan and 48 other states struggle to comply with the mandates of the Adam Walsh Act, the U.S. Department of Justice is revising some of the implementation guidelines for that law to help the states find equitable ways to do so.

The Adam Walsh Act was passed by Congress in 2006 and gave the states until July of this year to make a number of changes to the way they handled their sex offender registries; it they failed to do so, they could lose hundreds of millions of dollars in federal aid. But after years of complaints about the mandated changes, the DOJ has proposed new guidelines to loosen some of those requirements, Stateline reports:

As Stateline has reported, however, many states disagree with key provisions of the law that they see as too strict, including a stipulation that some juvenile sex offenders as young as 14 be placed on public registries. In Delaware, as the Wilmington News-Journal recently reported, some offenders as young as 9 are listed on the public sex offender Web site. Youth advocates and others have said that posting images and personal information of juveniles can lead to harassment, and that juveniles should not be grouped with more serious, adult criminals.

The changes proposed Friday give states the discretion to decide if they want to include juveniles on their registries.

Under another proposed change, sex offenders whose crimes pre-dated the Adam Walsh Act, and who have exited the justice system, would not be forced to abide by its registration requirements. While courts have found the provision constitutional — holding that registration is not a new criminal penalty but a civil, regulatory requirement instead — states have argued that it is overly burdensome to track down and register sex offenders who already have served their time and re-joined the population. The Justice Department recognized that concern, giving states “greater latitude” not to register certain offenders.

Only Ohio has complied with all of the requirements so far, leaving 49 states, including Michigan, in limbo. Our state legislature had planned to address this issue later this year. The DOJ has granted a one-year waiver to all 49 states this year to give them time to implement these new guidelines after a two-month comment period, so that may take the pressure off to get something done soon.

Unfortunately, that also means putting off other meaningful changes. One of the requirements of the Adam Walsh Act is that states create tiers for sexual offenders, grouping them together based on the severity of their crime. That provides the opportunity for the state to address the problem of having people convicted of non-predatory crimes, like Romeo and Juliet relationships, listed next to rapists and pedophiles.

Comments

  • http://www.cfcamerica.org Concerned

    Why not just follow the constitution as far as retroactivety? The new SORNA guidelines, (Adam Walsh Act) Were recently revised giving states the latitude to NOT apply the sex offender registration laws Retroactively, (EX-POST FACTO)
    However, any state, and too the United States Supreme Court which implements any ex post facto law does in fact violate both the Federal and State Constitutions.
    Article 1
    Section 9 of the United States Constitution. … No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.
    I am extremely upset with the language whereby the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT GIVES THE STATES THE POWER TO REGULATE THEMSELVES… that is totally backwards.
    The people rule the state governments, and elect State Officials to ensure the voice of the people is heard in all proceedings.. the federal government has no power over the states in this matter.
    This new SORNA regulation allowing states to decide to implement their sex offender registration laws is a sham, a way to get states to go along with the Federal Adam Walsh Act.
    No state besides Ohio, which totally disrespects the Constitution has even implemented the Adam Walsh Act, and most will not. Citizens for Change, America http://www.cfcamerica.org

    • Anonymous

      Dear Concerned: you are absolutely correct! The Adam Walsh Act is in direct violation to our Constitutional rights to to ex-post facto lawsy y. I, unfortunately, fall into the horde of persons who did not need to be incarcerated, but could get counseling for, in my case, spousal abuse (I’m a guy) and co-dependency. It is far to easy for an ex to get revenge on a person thru their children. Wyoming has excepted the coersion by the Fed Gvt. to enforce the Adam Walsh Act or lose millions in funding for the Police Depts. including weapons, clothing, etc. I’ve been out since 2002, have remarried, been accepted by my wife’s children, even to the samll grandchildren. They have observed me and KNOW there is no danger. Also, my Sentencing/Release papers both state that I am eligible in 10 years after release to patition the Court for release from registration.  Under this new law,  that right and provision is being violated by saying I have to register for lifetime. All I want to do is get on with my life and not worry about some whacko deciding to be a vigalante. My prayer is that more sane people will see the injustice and fight for what is right. Thank you.   

  • Anonymous

    I live in Ohio and I have seen what this law has done to many innocent people. They don’t need anything but the girl saying it happened to charge the guy. NO rape kit or any other evidence. Sorry, but with this law getting past without actual details of how to determine if it’s true or not is a waste of money. No lawyer in Ohio wants to take these types of cases to court. Its a he said she said case. 99% of the Lawyers make guys take a plea because jury is going to believe the guy. It’s a money making project. The lawyer gets paid, the court gets fines and court costs, and the victim gets restitution. No rape kit is needed. Just the girl saying it happened. Sad thing is in Ohio we can go back 20yrs and get people for this crime.