Top Stories

The Michigan Messenger going forward

By Staff Report | 11.16.11

I am writing today to announce the closure of the Michigan Messenger. After four years of operation in Michigan, the board of the American Independent News Network, has decided to shift publication of its news into a single site, The American Independent at Americanindependent.com. This is part of a shift in strategy, towards new forms [...]

Colorado-based abstinence program provided false and misleading information to Michigan students

HIV-AIDS-small
By Todd A. Heywood | 11.16.11

An abstinence-only presentation provided to numerous school districts in Calhoun and Eaton Counties in October of this year provided false and misleading information to students about HIV, experts allege.

Class action lawsuit filed against MERS over unpaid taxes

foreclosure
By Todd A. Heywood | 11.15.11

Two county registers of deeds filed a class action lawsuit Monday on behalf of Michigan’s 83 counties alleging that the Mortgage Electronic Registration Services owes millions of dollars in property title transfer taxes.

Schuette fights important mercury regulations

epa_logo
By Eartha Jane Melzer | 11.14.11

Despite evidence of the impact of mercury on children and public health, Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette last month joined with 24 other state attorneys general in filing a lawsuit to scuttle new EPA regulations that would reduce mercury emissions from power plants.

Teacher retirement plan passed by legislature

By Ed Brayton | 05.14.10 | 10:17 am

After weeks of negotiations the Michigan legislature finally passed a package of bills reforming the pension system for public school employees. One bill would encourage older public school teachers to retire by boosting their pension benefits, allowing the state to hire younger teachers at lower pay rates. A second bill passed at the same time requires public school employees to contribute 3 percent of their salaries toward their eventual retirement. The package also includes a new “hybrid” pension plan for new teacher hires, mixing defined-benefit and defined-contribution plans.

Taken together, these provisions are expected to save the state $3.15 billion over ten years, including approximately $680 million in the next fiscal year. That should cut the expected deficit for FY 2011 by about one-third. Gov. Granholm is expected to sign the bill into law.

Both the House and Senate had previously passed different versions of this package in late April and a conference committee then reconciled the two versions. Both chambers then had to vote on the final package. It passed the Senate by a 21-14 vote and the House by a 56-45 vote.

Reaction has been predictably mixed. Business Leaders for Michigan, a group of senior executives from businesses and universities in the state, praised the bill in a press release:

Business Leaders for Michigan commends the Governor, Legislative leadership and the House and Senate members who voted for Senate Bill 1227 for working together to to bring meaningful reform and significant savings to the state…

This is an example of what can happen if both sides work together on holistic reform. We now urge the legislature to continue this momentum and act on SB 1226, pertaining to state employee retirement, and other structural reforms currently pending before both houses of the legislature.

The Michigan Education Association, the largest teachers union in the state, had a different reaction. Their press release said:

“The retirement legislation passed this morning by Michigan Senate and House lawmakers is an ill-conceived plan that will not deliver savings to cash-strapped school districts. The meager ‘incentive’ included in the bill will fail to entice anyone not already planning to retire to do so. In fact, it will cost school districts far more money than any estimated savings because the numbers of potential retirees who might take advantage is grossly exaggerated.

“The legislation also fails to include charter school employees and private contractors in the pension plan, a move that would have stabilized the retirement system by increasing the number of participating employees.

“Finally, dozens of legislators violated their ‘no tax’ pledge by enacting a 3 percent tax on current employees to pay for this, effectively forcing them to take an additional pay cut at a time when they have already accepted concessions that have saved the state over a billion dollars in the past three years.

The MEA predicts that the bill will result in “massive cuts…larger class sizes and the elimination of key programs that generate proven results.”

Comments

  • marymattner

    This bill will not do what legislators hope. The incentive to retire is not so attractive now that phased retirement is removed, and it places a terrible burden on remaining teachers, many of whom will see pay cuts this year from their districts. For a new hire to pay 11.4 percent of his or her income to fund retirement is outrageous. The rest of us get to pay a 3 percent increase in our withholdings – to fund a health care trust that is NOT guaranteed to be there when we retire. Further, how honest are legislators being about their own efforts to increase their 401's and ensure health care for themselves? Teachers saw Engler raid their pension fund many years ago, and now Granholm has sent a clear message: in Michigan, teachers are fair game and unvalued. How can we attract the best and brightest of new teaching recruits? If they have sense, they will seek other careers or other states.

  • drstevens09

    There are countless reforms that the Legislature has left unexamined. They really ought to consider some of the the proposals Business Leaders for Michigan have put together. If we get our fiscal house in order, that means no more scrambling at the 11th hour to close a $2 billion budget deficit. That means schools and other units of local government can do sufficient long-term planning to make the right decisions. It also means we can avoid job-killing tax increases or draconian cuts to vital public programs.

    Here are just three proposals from http://www.michiganturnaroundplan.com that, if adopted, would save hundreds of millions of dollars:

    - Encourage & enable local government service sharing (Minimum estimated savings: $250M)
    - Encourage & enable local school district service sharing (Minimum estimated savings: $300M)
    - Enact corrections management and sentencing reforms (Estimated savings: $400M)