In a study of how transparent the 50 states are with their budget data, prepared by the Public Interest Research Group, Michigan is one of 18 states to receive a failing grade. The study evaluated the states on how closely they met the guidelines of Transparency 2.0, a standard requiring a comprehensive, searchable database of budget information.
In the executive summary of the report, PIRG says:
The ability to see how government uses the public purse is fundamental to democracy. Spending transparency checks corruption, bolsters public confidence in government, and promotes fiscal responsibility.
It is a particularly important tool for journalists and activists to be able to track how the public’s money is being spent. Michigan was cited as one of 14 states that have no transparency website at all.
And getting budget information from the state the old-fashioned way, through FOIA requests, is a hit or miss prospect. Some departments are quite cooperative, while others seem to invent reasons to prevent giving out information on how public money is spent.
A good example is the Michigan Department of Community Health’s invocation of terrorism as an excuse for not releasing what turned out to be entirely mundane information on how the state spent money for H1N1 treatment and prevention (though, to be fair, at other times the MDCH has been perfectly cooperative about such information).