Top Stories

The Michigan Messenger going forward

By Staff Report | 11.16.11

I am writing today to announce the closure of the Michigan Messenger. After four years of operation in Michigan, the board of the American Independent News Network, has decided to shift publication of its news into a single site, The American Independent at Americanindependent.com. This is part of a shift in strategy, towards new forms [...]

Colorado-based abstinence program provided false and misleading information to Michigan students

HIV-AIDS-small
By Todd A. Heywood | 11.16.11

An abstinence-only presentation provided to numerous school districts in Calhoun and Eaton Counties in October of this year provided false and misleading information to students about HIV, experts allege.

Class action lawsuit filed against MERS over unpaid taxes

foreclosure
By Todd A. Heywood | 11.15.11

Two county registers of deeds filed a class action lawsuit Monday on behalf of Michigan’s 83 counties alleging that the Mortgage Electronic Registration Services owes millions of dollars in property title transfer taxes.

Schuette fights important mercury regulations

epa_logo
By Eartha Jane Melzer | 11.14.11

Despite evidence of the impact of mercury on children and public health, Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette last month joined with 24 other state attorneys general in filing a lawsuit to scuttle new EPA regulations that would reduce mercury emissions from power plants.

Traverse City official calls biomass forums a ‘charade’

By Eartha Jane Melzer | 03.31.10 | 4:02 pm

In response to community opposition to plans to build wood-fired power plants in Traverse City the municipally owned power company held a series of forums last month to gather public input on how best to generate power.

Traverse City Light and Power promised to analyze and publicly respond to community concerns before settling on a strategy for power generation, but in a letter mailed to ratepayers over the weekend the utility asserted that any plan other that wood-based power generation would cause rates to rise and create financial hardship for local businesses.

City Commissioner Barbara Budros told the Traverse City Record Eagle that the utility’s letter shows that the prolonged public input process about the proposed biomass plan was nothing more than a “charade.”

“Why are people showing up to provide input when the input’s irrelevant and the decision’s already been made?” Budros said.

The Northern Michigan Environmental Action Council told the paper that it believes the letter shows that despite promises to the contrary, Light & Power is committed to building the plant which some worry will deplete regional forests and lower air quality.

“We can’t overstate how disappointed NMEAC was to read this letter … the content and timing of the letter suggest to us that TCL&P has no intent to listen seriously to the concerns of the community about biomass or to look objectively at the alternatives,” a Tuesday letter from NMEAC board Chairman Greg Reisig and Director Ken Smith to Light & Power Director Ed Rice said.

“It feeds directly into the suspicion expressed by many people regarding the sincerity of TCL&P’s public involvement efforts.”.

Comments

  • keithschneider1

    There's no charade in Traverse City. Just a utility trying to lead a city and region to embrace acquiring 30 percent of its energy from local renewable resources by 2020. If the Michigan Messenger dug even a little deeper it would have found that a number of prominent voices in and outside the community support the 30BY20 plan and a proposal to replace the dirtiest fuel of all – coal-fired power — with a clean, state of the art, combined heat and power wood biomass gasification plant. That technology burns much cleaner than coal. It also keeps $4 million in the community now sent to Wyoming, to railroads, and to downstate coal-fired utilities. The Michigan Land Use Institute published an alternative plan that also calls for what it said was a “small amount of biomass.” The state director of the Department of Energy Labor and Economic Growth visited Traverse City and said he supported the wood biomass option. The Union of Concerned Scientists supported the wood biomass option in Traverse City. Defeating the plan, which is what some environmentalists want to do, isn't a win for anybody. It just means TCL&P continues to burn more coal.

    See: http://www.tclp.org/30by20
    See: http://www.modeshift. org

  • earthajanemelzer

    Hi Keith,

    Thanks for writing.

    In your modeshift article you state:

    “But the Northern Michigan Environmental Action Council, which this month celebrates its 30th anniversary, has led the charge against the biomass idea, asserting without a strong fact base that the plant will produce excess pollution (it won’t), toxic ash (it isn’t), and harm to the forests (not true).”

    Can you offer a fact base to support your assertion that the proposed Traverse City plant will not produce excess pollution?

    A comparison of the air permit issued for the proposed Mancelona biomass plant and the one approved for Consumers Energy's new coal plant indicates that the wood-burning plant will emit slightly more particultate matter and more NOX and VOC than the coal plant.

    http://michiganmessenger.com/33868/proposed-bio…

    Also, as the communications consultant retained by TCL&P for this project were you involved in drafting the recent letter in which Executive Director Ed Rice warned ratepayers that alternatives to biomass would cause financial problems in the city?

    Thanks,