Top Stories

The Michigan Messenger going forward

By Staff Report | 11.16.11

I am writing today to announce the closure of the Michigan Messenger. After four years of operation in Michigan, the board of the American Independent News Network, has decided to shift publication of its news into a single site, The American Independent at Americanindependent.com. This is part of a shift in strategy, towards new forms [...]

Colorado-based abstinence program provided false and misleading information to Michigan students

HIV-AIDS-small
By Todd A. Heywood | 11.16.11

An abstinence-only presentation provided to numerous school districts in Calhoun and Eaton Counties in October of this year provided false and misleading information to students about HIV, experts allege.

Class action lawsuit filed against MERS over unpaid taxes

foreclosure
By Todd A. Heywood | 11.15.11

Two county registers of deeds filed a class action lawsuit Monday on behalf of Michigan’s 83 counties alleging that the Mortgage Electronic Registration Services owes millions of dollars in property title transfer taxes.

Schuette fights important mercury regulations

epa_logo
By Eartha Jane Melzer | 11.14.11

Despite evidence of the impact of mercury on children and public health, Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette last month joined with 24 other state attorneys general in filing a lawsuit to scuttle new EPA regulations that would reduce mercury emissions from power plants.

WJR’s Beckmann balks at being rated among most-biased

By Kevin Shopshire | 11.05.07 | 7:49 pm

WJR-AM radio commentator Frank Beckmann is not happy with the results of a Michigan Messenger reader survey.

Readers ranked Beckmann in second place among the most biased reporters, columnists and commentators in Michigan.

Beckmann tried to laugh the poll off, but it bothered him enough to email me six times. 

Detroit News editorial page editor Nolan Finley was picked as the most biased. But the impression I got from him was basically an amused “so what.” 

Beckmann was a little different. Those who have watched Bill O’Reilly on his Fox News show “The O’Reilly Factor” constantly describe the national blog Media Matters as a “left-wing smear site” know how some people react when you hold a mirror up to them. What is Media Matters’ great sin and how is it smearing O’Reilly?  Simply by posting actual video of some of the stuff he says on his show.

“I addressed this on the air this morning,” Beckmann wrote of the survey, “and stressed my disappointment at finishing second…..clearly, I failed to energiize (sic) my base and plan to get a better turnout next year……you must be pleased with your truly massive response of 43 votes in a week….that’s  impressive…..I also adopted you as my official liberal website.” 

Continued -I explained to Beckmann that although I too was disappointed at the small number of votes cast, Michigan Messenger has only been around for some six weeks, and that any startup venture in any medium begins slowly. I also explained that an online newspaper is a completely new medium, and obviously more people owned radios than computers. Also, to vote you had to register with a screen name and password, and like talk radio, many people may listen or read but they do not all call in or comment; I guess that’s where the term “long-time listener, first-time caller” came from. But the 43 votes was a constant theme with Beckmann, and he pointed it out in almost every email.

“You act as if your vote with 43 ballots is somehow significant,” he wrote.  “By all measures, my show has been a success…..The Michigan Association of Broadcasters afforded me two  major awards last year, for ‘News Coverage’ and for  ‘Personality of the Year.’ ”

I pointed out to him, again, that although the 43 votes were fewer  than I had hoped for, still it was the readers and not me who chose him as one of the most biased commentators. Perhaps the question I should have asked was if he thought a mere 43 votes was  so insignificant, why was he wasting his time emailing me. He offered to let me appear on his show, but it wasn’t clear he was serious.

I listened to his show last  Wednesday and Thursday while working and a small portion of the show on Friday while driving. I discovered Beckmann was correct when he said he regularly has liberals and progressives on.  But after listening I have little doubt that those who  voted for him made a good decision. He clearly treats non-conservative guests he disagrees with much more differently than conservatives.

On the first show, on Halloween morning, just a few hours after the Michigan House had met until 4 a.m. to approve the final budget bills and avoid a second state government shutdown, he had a lot to say about the budget. He told his audience that the budget just passed actually was an increase from the previous year’s budget, but then failed to say why or  point out that many payments made in this budget were payments that were delayed from last year’s one-time fixes that were due.

It was very telling who his first guest was. Tricia Kinley, the director of tax policy for the Michigan Chamber of Commerce, was there to push the chamber’s attempt to kill the recently approved sales tax on some services. There was no one from the other side as a guest, and as always, there was no one to talk about how the budget would be balanced without the tax increase.

Beckmann did have former Democratic Gov. Jim Blanchard on the show, but Blanchard had to call him out on trying to pass off White House talking points on the Iraq occupation as his own opinions.

The next day, Thursday,  Beckmann had the House Republican leader,  Rep. Craig DeRoche, R-Novi, on to talk about the budget, despite the fact that every published report pointed out DeRoche had absolutely nothing to do with the budget negotiations that avoided a government shutdown.  Beckmann let everything DeRoche said go by unchallenged, including the misleading  claim that House Speaker Andy Dillon, D-Redford, has grown government and the number of state employees.

The truth is  that there are fewer state employees now than there were in 1973, as there were  more state employees under Republican governors Bill Milliken and John Engler than there are now. After Dillon’s segment, Beckmann chose to comment on what Dillon had to say but not DeRoche, and DeRoche’s comments went unchallenged again.

On Friday, he had the Senate Majority leader, Sen. Mike Bishop, R-Rochester, on to talk about the budget, and he got more softball questions than DeRoche. Beckmann did not bother to ask him how he actually planned to balance the budget without the revenue increases. Senate Minority Leader Sen. Mark Schauer, D-Battle Creek, should have been on to counter Bishop’s claims — following the pattern of the day before, when the leaders of both parties in the House were on the show.  But that did not happen.

Comments

  • LoRayne Apo-Joynt

    43 respondents… But many more readers, and that’s the real rub.

    Maybe only 43 people signed up for an account and took the time to vote in the first poll you ran, Kevin.

    But 4000+ people have been to this site since the poll ran, reading 2-3 pages on the average on arrival.

    Who knows how many people will read that poll and accompanying article in the next year?  or over the amount of time (read: years, decades) that the internet archives that article and poll?

    43 respondents may be all that’s ever needed to encourage the public to look more closely at Michigan’s excessive media consolidation and the narrowing of voices heard in that media.

    What’s really funny is that Beckmann was exploring media bias with Saul Anuzis only the week before Michigan Messenger ran its poll; you can imagine their spin on the topic.  Why is it they ignore that media in this state and the entire country is overwhelmingly owned by conservatives?  How is it a liberal media when it’s owned by conservatives?  And if it’s a liberal media, why is Frank part of it?  Wouldn’t a solid conservative be forced to find something else to do in another line of work if the media was so doggoned liberal?

  • arrowP

    Beckmann discussion Our reporter needs to reread the CODE of ETHICS as posted on this Michigan Messenger website. A SMALL data sample is no excuse for bad ethics! Get a larger data sample and THEN make a splash.

    See extracts for your reporter to ponder.  Respectfully, Robert O. Pritchard, Chair of the Bylaws Committee, Cheboygan County Democrats . . .

    Here is an extract:
    Code of Ethics
    by: admin
    Monday (09/10) at 03:19 AM
    Preamble
    . . .  New Journalist Fellows pursue these goals by maintaining a commitment to truthful, fair, and comprehensive coverage. By serving the public thoroughly and honestly, Fellows provide credible, professional, and truthful accounts of events and issues.

    Seek and Report the Truth

  • LoRayne Apo-Joynt

    43 respondents… But many more readers, and that's the real rub.

    Maybe only 43 people signed up for an account and took the time to vote in the first poll you ran, Kevin.

    But 4000+ people have been to this site since the poll ran, reading 2-3 pages on the average on arrival.

    Who knows how many people will read that poll and accompanying article in the next year?  or over the amount of time (read: years, decades) that the internet archives that article and poll?

    43 respondents may be all that's ever needed to encourage the public to look more closely at Michigan's excessive media consolidation and the narrowing of voices heard in that media.

    What's really funny is that Beckmann was exploring media bias with Saul Anuzis only the week before Michigan Messenger ran its poll; you can imagine their spin on the topic.  Why is it they ignore that media in this state and the entire country is overwhelmingly owned by conservatives?  How is it a liberal media when it's owned by conservatives?  And if it's a liberal media, why is Frank part of it?  Wouldn't a solid conservative be forced to find something else to do in another line of work if the media was so doggoned liberal?

  • arrowP

    Beckmann discussion Our reporter needs to reread the CODE of ETHICS as posted on this Michigan Messenger website. A SMALL data sample is no excuse for bad ethics! Get a larger data sample and THEN make a splash.

    See extracts for your reporter to ponder.  Respectfully, Robert O. Pritchard, Chair of the Bylaws Committee, Cheboygan County Democrats . . .

    Here is an extract:

    Code of Ethics

    by: admin

    Monday (09/10) at 03:19 AM

    Preamble

    . . .  New Journalist Fellows pursue these goals by maintaining a commitment to truthful, fair, and comprehensive coverage. By serving the public thoroughly and honestly, Fellows provide credible, professional, and truthful accounts of events and issues.

    Seek and Report the Truth

  • Kevin Shopshire

    Thank you I appreciate your comments, Mr. Pritchard, but I don't see an instance where I violated the Society of Professional Journalists standards. If you would care to point out a specific instance I would be more than happy to discuss it with you.

  • LoRayne Apo-Joynt

    Readers' opinions reflected The poll numbers represent the number of readers who chose to respond.  The results have been clearly posted as our respondents' opinions.

    Over time there will likely be more polls in which readers may participate, and the number of readers may be larger at that time, and the results will be posted as readers' opinions as they have been here.

    After reading your comment I wonder whether you have also questioned the voting process by which Mr. Beckmann received two awards from the Michigan Association of Broadcasters.  Persons in the broadcasting industry from outside the state of Michigan judge the entrants; does this truly represent the perspective of Beckmann's audience? At least our 43 respondents represent a cross-section of our predominantly Michigan readership at the time of the poll, and not the opinion of industry cohorts in an entirely different state. Have you also questioned why it would take the MBA so long to post the results of their 2006 awards to their website?  We produce fresh content every single day — why can't we vet Mr. Beckmann's claims by simply checking their website?

  • Kevin Shopshire

    Thank you I appreciate your comments, Mr. Pritchard, but I don’t see an instance where I violated the Society of Professional Journalists standards. If you would care to point out a specific instance I would be more than happy to discuss it with you.

  • LoRayne Apo-Joynt

    Readers’ opinions reflected The poll numbers represent the number of readers who chose to respond.  The results have been clearly posted as our respondents’ opinions.

    Over time there will likely be more polls in which readers may participate, and the number of readers may be larger at that time, and the results will be posted as readers’ opinions as they have been here.

    After reading your comment I wonder whether you have also questioned the voting process by which Mr. Beckmann received two awards from the Michigan Association of Broadcasters.  Persons in the broadcasting industry from outside the state of Michigan judge the entrants; does this truly represent the perspective of Beckmann’s audience? At least our 43 respondents represent a cross-section of our predominantly Michigan readership at the time of the poll, and not the opinion of industry cohorts in an entirely different state. Have you also questioned why it would take the MBA so long to post the results of their 2006 awards to their website?  We produce fresh content every single day — why can’t we vet Mr. Beckmann’s claims by simply checking their website?

Categories & Tags: | |