The Detroit Free Press reports that efforts to amend the state’s term limits on legislators to make them considerably longer than they are now appear to be stalled as it has proven difficult to convince voters of what knowledgeable political observers know — that term limits has proven to be a very bad idea.
Here’s one of the reasons why:
A Wayne State University study released this past week notes that Michigan lawmakers said in interviews conducted from 1998 through 2004 that they spend less time monitoring state agencies and are more likely to turn to lobbyists as a source of information and guidance now that term limits are in place.
“Term limits were sold to Michigan voters on the notion that they would sever close ties with lobbyists and cause legislators to be more independent. In reality, we found them to have the opposite impact,” political science professor Marjorie Sarbaugh-Thompson, one of five study authors, said in a release.
This is hardly a surprise to anyone who deals with legislators and lobbyists close up. A candid lobbyist, perhaps after a drink or two, will tell you that term limits have greatly increased their influence over legislators because they are pretty much the only people with institutional memory or a real understanding of how the process works.