Top Stories

The Michigan Messenger going forward

By Staff Report | 11.16.11

I am writing today to announce the closure of the Michigan Messenger. After four years of operation in Michigan, the board of the American Independent News Network, has decided to shift publication of its news into a single site, The American Independent at Americanindependent.com. This is part of a shift in strategy, towards new forms [...]

Colorado-based abstinence program provided false and misleading information to Michigan students

HIV-AIDS-small
By Todd A. Heywood | 11.16.11

An abstinence-only presentation provided to numerous school districts in Calhoun and Eaton Counties in October of this year provided false and misleading information to students about HIV, experts allege.

Class action lawsuit filed against MERS over unpaid taxes

foreclosure
By Todd A. Heywood | 11.15.11

Two county registers of deeds filed a class action lawsuit Monday on behalf of Michigan’s 83 counties alleging that the Mortgage Electronic Registration Services owes millions of dollars in property title transfer taxes.

Schuette fights important mercury regulations

epa_logo
By Eartha Jane Melzer | 11.14.11

Despite evidence of the impact of mercury on children and public health, Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette last month joined with 24 other state attorneys general in filing a lawsuit to scuttle new EPA regulations that would reduce mercury emissions from power plants.

Harkin: Stupak is ‘totally misinformed’ on Senate health bill

By Lynda Waddington | 03.04.10 | 3:51 pm

U.S. Rep. Bart Stupak, a Michigan Democrat and outspoken anti-abortion activist, appeared Thursday morning on ABC’s Good Morning America to announce that he and 11 House members would not support the U.S. Senate’s version of health care reform due to their belief it offers a taxpayer subsidy of abortion services.

Iowa Democratic U.S. Sen. Tom Harkin shot back on his morning conference call with reporters, instructing Stupak to read the Senate bill.

“Mr. Stupak is, sadly, totally misinformed,” Harkin said. “I hope he reads the bill, and I hope he talks with people here. We have plenty of people who share his philosophy on that who voted for our bill in the Senate. … There is no provision in the Senate bill that allows the federal government to subsidize or otherwise pay for abortions. It is simply not so — and saying it doesn’t make it so.”

Stupak was the author of the Stupak Amendment, which was ultimately folded in the U.S. House’s version of health care reform. That amendment limited access to reproductive services, including abortion, for people who would receive federal subsidies or purchase health insurance through proposed marketplace exchanges. The exact language of the Stupak Amendment was considered by the U.S. Senate, and failed on a 54-45 vote.

Although Stupak is adamant that the language could still be included in the bill if the reconciliation process is used to place it on the president’s desk, Harkin says that process is limited to fiscal concerns.

“You can’t deal with that in reconciliation. Reconciliation can only deal with money matters — saving money and that sort of thing. You can’t deal with policy,” Harkin said. “Abortion is a policy position, not a money position.”

Kathleen Sebelius, secretary of health and human services also appeared on ABC and said the current national climate regarding abortion should not be allowed to derailed health care reform.

“This is about changing the health care system to ease the burden on [the] families and small businesses facing skyrocketing insurance premiums,” she said.

Calling the Senate bill “totally unacceptable,” Stupak told George Stephanopoulos that he does not believe there is enough support in the U.S. House for passage. Harkin, however, points to the apparent waning support of the Stupak language and promised that reform would pass — hopefully by March 26.

“I don’t know if Mr. Stupak is right on his 11 votes,” Harkin said. “He had more than that before… but, if he is down to 11, he’s losing.”

Comments

  • ConservativeinaLiberalLand

    My Representaive, Mr. Bart Stupak, is right on supporting Life. Thanks, Bart.

  • AIR121931

    IS his name STUPAK or STUPID. With all the blood sweat tears shed to pass this Insurance Reform Bill for hundreds of reasons. . .unfair insurance practices, pre-existing conditions, insurance for thousands that do not have any, insurance for those that may lose their jobs, affordable insurance, controlling costs so that the billions of monies taken to the top executives for these insurance companies it can go to better the medical conditions rather than trip to the Bahamas. Mr. STUPID now that we are down to the wire decides that abortion should be an issue taken up in this Reform Bill. Everyone is entitled to their beliefs and standards but where do the lives of 45,000 people who die every year because of lack of insurance stack up with those that do not even exist in this world? How do you defend those lives? I don't know this man's voting record but I would not be surprised that he voted for the war in Iraq where our government murdered 5,000 soldiers maimed hundreds of thousands wounds that will last forever& then say “whoops” no weapons of mass destruction. MR STUPID seems to be doing the same here, 45,000 die a year because of lack of insurance OH WELL!
    But STUPID doesnt want to sign the bill because of abortion which is not in the bill. ..OK. . .Your guy MICHIGAN!!!!

  • Michael_Heath

    This article is every bit as bad as all other articles on this issue in the sense it's framed as a 'he said, she said' story without the journalist fact-checking the claims so the public knows the exact policy dispute being debated.

    Rep. Stupak has been very specific in his explicitly stated claim that Speaker Pelosi is lying on this matter when she claims the Senate Bill and the original House bill were in compliance with the Hyde Amendment regarding restrictions on federal funding for abortions. Rep. Stupak's challenge to this assertion has had him calling out the exact page numbers of the Senate Bill on last evening's MSNBC Hardball with Chris Matthews. Rep. Stupak noted the language and then referenced another document that applies if the Senate bill passes; that supposedly mandates a measly $1/mo. on all premiums invoiced in the new exchanges to fund some abortions undescribed by Rep. Stupak or the reporters interviewing him. Perhaps it's to save the life or health of women who fall into a certain category which doesn't violate the Hyde Amendment. We don't know since there's been no in-depth reporting. Rep. Stupak certainly hasn't been convincing since the language in the Senate Bill is so cryptic, but neither have his opponents who don't rebut his precise points.

    Perhaps the Speaker and Mr. Stupak are talking past each other. The Speaker is claiming that the original language of the House bill and the current passed Senate version are both in compliance with the Hyde Amendment which doesn't allow federal funds to go towards funding abortion, though perhaps there are exceptions. Perhaps Mr. Stupak is attempting to restrict abortions even further than the Hyde Amendment. If the Senate Bill is in compliance with the Hyde Amendment and yet some federal funds do subsidize at least some types of abortions, than neither's lying. We don't know since no one is asking the tough questions or getting someone trained in reading this language to dig into the actual language of the Senate bill in spite of Rep. Stupak pointing out the exact language he claims has federal funds going towards abortion.

    I do not support Rep. Stupak's position, both when he got the House Bill amended and now. Especially since his issue isn't a budgetary issue where the Senate parliamentarian probably wouldn't allow his language to be voted on in the Senate through the reconciliation process; that alone threatens getting the far more important initiative passed than Mr. Stupak's mission, health insurance reform.

    What I do support is competent reporting and that just isn't happening. In fairness to this journalist, all other reporters seem to be failing as well at getting into the facts, including Chris Matthews last evening when he had Rep. Stupak on his show.

  • lapdogd

    What is Stupak's conscience going to be when he reads about more and more UNinsured people losing their life?

    Or don't BORN people concern Stupak a single bit?

  • lapdogd

    What is Stupak's conscience going to be when he reads about more and more UNinsured people losing their life?

    Or don't BORN people concern Stupak a single bit?

Categories & Tags: | |