Top Stories

The Michigan Messenger going forward

By Staff Report | 11.16.11

I am writing today to announce the closure of the Michigan Messenger. After four years of operation in Michigan, the board of the American Independent News Network, has decided to shift publication of its news into a single site, The American Independent at Americanindependent.com. This is part of a shift in strategy, towards new forms [...]

Colorado-based abstinence program provided false and misleading information to Michigan students

HIV-AIDS-small
By Todd A. Heywood | 11.16.11

An abstinence-only presentation provided to numerous school districts in Calhoun and Eaton Counties in October of this year provided false and misleading information to students about HIV, experts allege.

Class action lawsuit filed against MERS over unpaid taxes

foreclosure
By Todd A. Heywood | 11.15.11

Two county registers of deeds filed a class action lawsuit Monday on behalf of Michigan’s 83 counties alleging that the Mortgage Electronic Registration Services owes millions of dollars in property title transfer taxes.

Schuette fights important mercury regulations

epa_logo
By Eartha Jane Melzer | 11.14.11

Despite evidence of the impact of mercury on children and public health, Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette last month joined with 24 other state attorneys general in filing a lawsuit to scuttle new EPA regulations that would reduce mercury emissions from power plants.

MSU group cancels appearance by racist British leader

By Todd A. Heywood | 02.17.10 | 7:05 am

EAST LANSING — British National Party leader Nick Griffin — known for his denial of the Holocaust and his advocacy of throwing all non-whites and non-Europeans out of the British Isles — has canceled several speaking engagements this week, including a scheduled appearance at Michigan State University on Thursday.

Griffin was invited to speak at MSU by a new student group called Sons of Liberty. The group’s president and founder, Jordan Zammit, issued a press release late Tuesday afternoon blaming the cancellation on “left-wing agitators” who “relentlessly threatened with violence and death the organizers of the events.”

British National Party Leader Nick Griffin, flanked by American white nationalist Preston Wigginton (in th white sweater), speaking at Michigan State University in October 2007.

British National Party Leader Nick Griffin, flanked by American white nationalist Preston Wigginton (in the white sweater), speaking at Michigan State University in October 2007.

Griffin was to speak at three events this week – at MSU on Thursday from noon to 1:30, then at Kenyon College in Ohio later that day, and finally this weekend at the biennial American Renaissance conference in Virginia.

The appearance at Kenyon College had already been canceled on Monday afternoon. Taylor Somers, leader of the Robert A. Taft Society at Kenyon College, announced he was rescinding the invitation to Griffin to speak because they feared violence, reports One People’s Project.

The possibility of violence, or at least unintentional injury, to Kenyon students at such an event outweighs, we feel, any contribution that could be gained from having Griffin speak. Never have we intended to incite violence or to otherwise provide an atmosphere in which it becomes at all likely. With Campus Safety’s advice in mind, and as members of the Kenyon community, we must take it upon ourselves to do the right thing and ensure no one is injured. It isn’t worth the possibility of violence or the further pain that will almost certainly be caused, so with those concerns in mind we have canceled.

It’s not clear who would be responsible for this hypothetical violence. Somers’ announcement came after he posted on his Facebook a call to others to “retaliate” against those who were opposing Griffin’s speech.

“The antifa[cists] thugs at the One People’s Project are hounding me,” Taylor Somers wrote on his Facebook recently, providing a link to the article in question. “Would anybody care to retaliate against them?”

One of Somers’ Facebook friends then responded, “Yes, let’s have some violent reaction to it. I live near D.C.” The same person then commented, “Smash the reds. White power!!!!”

When asked if there had been any threats aimed at Griffin’s appearance at MSU, Zammit told the Michigan Messenger that he had “not received death threats or threats of violence.” He also said he did not have any evidence or documentation for any such threats being aimed at the Kenyon College talk, and said only that he’d been “informed that the hotels that canceled the AmRen conference did so out of fear for their employees safety.”

That all of this talk of racism and white power involves Griffin and American Renaissance is not surprising. American Renaissance is the magazine of the New Century Foundation, a white nationalist organization founded by Jared Taylor.

This group has often been described as presenting a more genteel, academic-sounding version of old-fashioned racism. The magazine often features articles arguing for racial separatism and for the genetic inferiority of blacks. They prefer to call themselves “race realists.” Griffin has spoken to their conference before, in 2002.

Coincidentally, it was on the AmRen website that Zammit chose to announce Griffin’s speech at MSU and its cancellation, saying that the AmRen conference had to be canceled due to alleged threats against several hotels that had agreed to host the event.

“Griffin could not afford to spend time in the U.S. to only speak at MSU and at CPAC when he could otherwise spend his time campaigning for a seat in the U.K. Parliament,” Zammit wrote in his release.

But on Tuesday night, AmRen announced that the conference was back on because they had found a hotel near Capitol Hill that would host it. It’s not clear whether Griffin will still be appearing at the event.

Griffin’s appearance at MSU, however, remains canceled. “Mr. Griffin will not be making his way to MSU if he does come to the States,” Zammit said.

This would not have been Griffin’s first appearance the East Lansing campus. He spoke in October 2007, when his appearance was greeted with protests and turned in to a tense argument between Griffin and his audience.

“Muslims gang rape women in Norway and other cultures. Only Muslims do this,” he told the crowd. He spoke out against race mixing, saying, “We don’t believe in integration. Integration is extermination.”

During his Q and A with the audience, Griffin called protesters stupid, accused them of being bused in from Detroit, and of being lesbians. He also told protesters he would “shove” homosexuals back in the closet and “kill them.”

And while there was a cantankerous give and take between Griffin and the audience in October of 2007, there was no violence or arrests during the event. Following the event, however, several members of YAF were chased into a nearby parking ramp by protesters. No charges were ever filed over the incident.

For his part, Zammit stated several times in emails exchanged with the Michigan Messenger that he does not share Griffin’s views on race.

“My motivation for hosting Mr. Griffin was that I was presented with the opportunity, and although I do not agree with his views, I believe he has the right to speak, and therefore, since he was already coming to the United States, I believed it would be beneficial to the University if he came here,” Zammit said. “Again, I reiterate, I do not agree with Mr. Griffin’s views or his party, but I was very much looking forward to hearing him speak and his views on things. No harm could ever come from listening.”

Comments

  • jedwardtremlett

    ” He also told protesters he would “shove” homosexuals back in the closet and “kill them.””

    In fairness to Griffin, I don't think he said that. It's hard to tell with the audio, but I think he said he'd shove gays back in the closet, but that Muslims would line them up against a wall and kill them.

    That said, surely Zammit could have found someone – ANYONE – better to talk about global warming being a hoax than nick griffin.

  • mickconnolley

    this just show that mob rule works what happened to freedom of speach,do you need a limey to teach you lot your own constitution this is out ragioun if gaddafi wanted to address you would he get the same responce me thinks not

    • darylelamontjenkins

      I don't think Griffin is the man to teach anyone about freedom of anything. Freedom of Speech also includes freedom of the press, but Griffin thinks it is perfectly fine for his BNP thugs to beat up a reporter because they didn't like what was published in his paper about them. Mob rule? BNP's all about it!

  • patriotisanothernameforfascist

    Hate Speech does not equal free speech. The constitution has no monopoly on morality: far from it. We had to amend it many a times. Free speech is the first amendment, and like amendment 18, ought to be amended itself. Many countries have hate speech laws in place, and in this regard, I believe the US is quite backward. As it is in all too many of its policies. Good riddance to Mr. Griffin! His like, which apparently exist in our own MSU community, are scum. Worth combating, no doubt, but take caution. Notice not to get too close: like a skunks, they omit an insidious stench that can take a while to wash off.

    • ebrayton

      The US is, indeed, backward in many ways. The First Amendment is not one of them. The notion of criminalizing “hate speech” is absurd and dangerous. It is impossible to define and only serves to give the government far too much power in deciding what ideas can be expressed.

      Nick Griffin is a vile human being with vile beliefs. But I will absolutely defend his right to express them. One can defend the right to express a belief while simultaneously condemning what is being expressed. If you believe in free speech only for those ideas you like, you don't believe in free speech at all.

      • patriotisanothernameforfascist

        It is not impossible to define. Definitions can be generated in much the same way that hate crime definitions are. True, the government has in the past restricted speech, and the consequences have been dire (think Alien and Sedition Acts+ Sedition Act[1918] + HUAC). However, hate speech provisions are quite different in that they protect against dissemination of violent rhetoric, and they do so in a much more rigid way (in that, they are far more limited in their interpretation). American Renaissance is a blatantly racist, as you have observed, and ought to be banned. Free speech only preserves the capacity for them to legitimate their racist, xenophobic message.

        Not that I approve of nominative arguments, but the list of countries with various forms of hate speech provisions is significant: Brazil, Canada, Croatia, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Iceland, India, Ireland, New Zealand, Norway, Serbia, Singapore, South Africa, Sweden, Switzerland, and the UK. Provisions limit hate speech to being defined only in the public sphere, and often only in attempts to propagate it. I think such provisions are neither dangerous nor absurd, but rather the lacking of any such provision is both dangerous and absurd.

  • jackIL

    Hate speech is not a right and has no legal standing as “free” speech. Free speech does not mean that public institutions must give forums to these misguided folk. Is this further evidence of the strain of bigotry running through the Sons of Liberty? If the Tea Party movement isn't bigoted, why seek alliances with SoL? If your movement carries a bigoted message and you don't repudiate it, you own it. Still waiting.

    • ebrayton

      Actually, you're wrong. You may think that “hate speech” ought to be excluded from First Amendment protection but that doesn't mean it is. The courts have never recognized any such category and excluded it, nor should they. And in fact, MSU does legally have to provide a forum for Griffin if he is invited by a recognized student group. By allowing student groups to invite speakers to campus, the university has created what the courts call a designated public forum. That means that the university — which is the government — cannot decide which speakers get to speak and which ones do not based upon the content of the speech or the viewpoint being expressed. Not only can they not prevent Griffin from speaking, they are legally required to provide any legal protection necessary, regardless of the cost, and they cannot pass that cost on to the sponsoring organization (though they can charge a flat fee for security to the group as long as all groups pay the same fee). All of this is quite well established legal precedent in this country. You can argue that it shouldn't be that way, but you shouldn't pretend that it's not.

      As to whether this is evidence of bigotry among the Sons of Liberty, I suspect it does. The mere fact that they announced the event and its cancellation on the website of the openly racist American Renaissance suggests so. But I've also known lots of young conservatives to flirt with the fringes when they were in college and later figure out that's a bad idea. One of my best friends in college at MSU in the late 1980s did similar things and he grew out of it.

  • savebritian

    Mr Griffin you must remember grew up brainwashed in a racist and race concerned environment but has moved on and is growing . He is reforming and modernising his party. He now accepts the Holocaust and indeed has the best Israel policy of any European political party. Mr Griffin now considers all the old racial obsessions to be cranky and feels energies must go into saving Britain from Globalisation, mass immigration, Islamification, euroisation and regain Britain's sovereignityn and independence from Europe and maintain her national character, traditions and culture. He hopes that his ideas of democratic nationalism will spread across europe and to the United States. His party is reforming well but has a way to go, a huge intake of younger modern members will facilitate that gradually.

    • ebrayton

      Has now moved on and is growing? His party just had to be forced to accept non-white people last freaking week and he justified the violent expulsion of a reporter from the meeting announcing that change. When did this supposed enlightenment take place, last night?

  • mickconnolley

    the only reason the reporter was ejected was because in the past he and his paper has run a hole string of slur and down right lies what you over the pond wont have seen as it did not make head lines please go and read the bmp manifesto then and only then make an informed judgement thank you you see even supporters of nick have manners not that the media would have you belive that

  • mike5586

    The blatant lies in this article are quite amazing.
    “During his Q and A with the audience, Griffin called protesters stupid, accused them of being bused in from Detroit, and of being lesbians. He also told protesters he would “shove” homosexuals back in the closet and “kill them.””

    Nick Griffin is a lot of things, but stupid is not one of them. Take your ignorant propaganda somewhere else, the rest of us who have actually heard the man speak don't have time for it.

    As for those calling the publication American Ren. racist, you clearly don't know the definition of the word. I'd suggest Craig Bodeker's documentary on race, but I know none of you will watch anything that doesn't fit into your narrow minded world view anyways. Don't let that stop you from continuing to prattle on about all the 'evil racists' as if anyone but fanatical self-hating “progressives” like yourselves actually care.

    • ebrayton

      If American Renaissance is not racist then that term simply has no meaning anymore.

    • mickconnolley

      definition of racist/terrorist take a couple of planes of inocent peopl fly then in to a building and call it a war this is extreme racismagainst your peopl the same defencive stance you take now will encourage more of the same so dont learn from you first lesson disshonor the memory of your fallen let there death count for nothing as you and the other tree huggers wont learn if i have offended i am sorry i ment no insult i just feel a passion for freedom that islam will kill along with opponents

  • melanie1010

    Why is it that those who routinely come to these events, scream, holler, try to block entrances and take away people's right to free speech are never called extremists? They can even threaten people's lives and still you will only hear they are “passionate” or some other kind of biased garbage.

  • patriotisanothernameforfascist

    It is not impossible to define. Definitions can be generated in much the same way that hate crime definitions are. True, the government has in the past restricted speech, and the consequences have been dire (think Alien and Sedition Acts+ Sedition Act[1918] + HUAC). However, hate speech provisions are quite different in that they protect against dissemination of violent rhetoric, and they do so in a much more rigid way (in that, they are far more limited in their interpretation). American Renaissance is a blatantly racist, as you have observed, and ought to be banned. Free speech only preserves the capacity for them to legitimate their racist, xenophobic message.

    Not that I approve of nominative arguments, but the list of countries with various forms of hate speech provisions is significant: Brazil, Canada, Croatia, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Iceland, India, Ireland, New Zealand, Norway, Serbia, Singapore, South Africa, Sweden, Switzerland, and the UK. Provisions limit hate speech to being defined only in the public sphere, and often only in attempts to propagate it. I think such provisions are neither dangerous nor absurd, but rather the lacking of any such provision is both dangerous and absurd.