Top Stories

The Michigan Messenger going forward

By Staff Report | 11.16.11

I am writing today to announce the closure of the Michigan Messenger. After four years of operation in Michigan, the board of the American Independent News Network, has decided to shift publication of its news into a single site, The American Independent at Americanindependent.com. This is part of a shift in strategy, towards new forms [...]

Colorado-based abstinence program provided false and misleading information to Michigan students

HIV-AIDS-small
By Todd A. Heywood | 11.16.11

An abstinence-only presentation provided to numerous school districts in Calhoun and Eaton Counties in October of this year provided false and misleading information to students about HIV, experts allege.

Class action lawsuit filed against MERS over unpaid taxes

foreclosure
By Todd A. Heywood | 11.15.11

Two county registers of deeds filed a class action lawsuit Monday on behalf of Michigan’s 83 counties alleging that the Mortgage Electronic Registration Services owes millions of dollars in property title transfer taxes.

Schuette fights important mercury regulations

epa_logo
By Eartha Jane Melzer | 11.14.11

Despite evidence of the impact of mercury on children and public health, Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette last month joined with 24 other state attorneys general in filing a lawsuit to scuttle new EPA regulations that would reduce mercury emissions from power plants.

Global sex offender list proposed

By Ed Brayton | 02.16.10 | 7:10 am

Despite the many problems and unjust aspects of sex offender registries in the United States, one California legislator wants to replicate the idea internationally, establishing a global sex offender list that could track people from country to country as well as state to state. The Detroit Free Press reports:

While the law now applies to all states, California Republican Rep. Dan Lungren is proposing a worldwide crackdown on high-risk sex offenders and sex trafficking.

Under his bill, convicted sex offenders would have to tell local law enforcement of their travel plans 21 days before leaving their country. That information would then be shared with diplomatic officials in foreign countries, who could keep track of the offenders. Lungren is already working with the Mexican government on the proposal.

“The idea is to notify law enforcement officials in those countries that people are traveling,” said Lungren, who called sex trafficking “a plague on our region and our nation.”

And if it was only sex traffickers and pedophiles that ended up on such a list, that might not be a problem. But as we’ve been documenting over the last few weeks, every state has different criteria for what kinds of crimes qualify for the registry and very few states limit the list only to actual predators.

In many states you can end up being a “registered sex offender” for anything from soliciting a prostitute to mooning someone to having a consensual Romeo and Juliet relationship with another teenager to “sexting” (sending explicit pictures of oneself over a cell phone).

But here’s the real problem with proposals like this:

However, Michael Macleod-Ball, the ACLU’s chief legislative and policy counsel, said he fears the bill will pass because no one in Congress will want to cast a vote that could be interpreted as supporting sex offenders.

“Absolutely, we’re worried about something like this passing because it’s very easy to get a yes vote,” he said. “Maybe we should say the converse: If you vote against something like this, you sort of stick out like a sore thumb.”

Which is exactly why no legislator has the courage to fix the situation. Talk to lawmakers about it and every one of them will tell you, off the record, that they know there is much injustice being done and they think it needs to be changed — but none of them is willing to put their career on the line to do it.

Comments

  • ShelomithStow

    Thank you, Mr. Brayton, for having the courage to actually put in print that many problems exist with these laws as they now exist and that legislators know this but propose and vote for them anyway due to political expediency. If more journalists were like you, willing to speak an unpopular truth, and more of the media were willing to print and air that truth, we just might end up with a sex offender registry that reflected only violent sexual predators and child molesters and could be used as originally intended, as a tool in aiding law enforcement in keeping communities safer.

  • suetiggers

    Yes, thank you Mr. Brayton. We need more truthtellers like yourself. The lie is VERY popular. And it is scurrilous that lawmakers who know better (obviously, there are ignorant ones) would care more about keeping their jobs than having some guts to do what's right. As a mother,I too feel alarmed at any young child being harmed.

    The registry could work much better by getting the people off it who are NOT DANGEROUS! To learn more about what works/what doesn’t go to: http://www.reformsexoffenderlaws.org/index.php
    MYTHS AND FACTS ABOUT SEX OFFENDERS
    http://www.csom.org/pubs/mythsfacts.html

    http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/columnist…
    http://www.economist.com/displaystory.cfm?story…

    http://www.economist.com/opinion/displaystory.c…

  • suetiggers

    Adams'laws &similar ones have NOT been successful at protecting children more. Putting more and more NON-DANGEROUS people on the registry, takes up more time by law enforcement & the courts. Too many crimes that used to be misdemeanors are now felonies. This creates more fear but less understanding of the problem.
    NON-DANGEROUS people on the registry take attention away from those who REALLY need closer observation (i.e.Garrido case).These type of “stranger-danger” cases arouse strong emotion but they are actually a small minority of sex offenders. Most are WITHIN FAMILIES or a neighbor or someone the child or their family KNOWS. This is counter to public opinion. But, the laws should not be changed according to hysteria,i.e. Nancy Grace and Fox drama-driven, sound-bite “news” stories. And of course, opportunistic politicians love it. There are much better ways to deal with this problem. Countries like England,Scotland&Canada are doing good work. COSA is an example that works with potentially dangerous sex offenders. People that think pedophiles can't be changed do not know what they're talking about. It's a small fraction that can't. Many can. (but not by prison, even though they belong there if they're dangerous.) Most, however, get out, so let's get real and get any of them help who want it so they do not reoffend.

  • ShelomithStow

    Thank you, Mr. Brayton, for having the courage to actually put in print that many problems exist with these laws as they now exist and that legislators know this but propose and vote for them anyway due to political expediency. If more journalists were like you, willing to speak an unpopular truth, and more of the media were willing to print and air that truth, we just might end up with a sex offender registry that reflected only violent sexual predators and child molesters and could be used as originally intended, as a tool in aiding law enforcement in keeping communities safer.

  • suetiggers

    Yes, thank you Mr. Brayton. We need more truthtellers like yourself. The lie is VERY popular. And it is scurrilous that lawmakers who know better (obviously, there are ignorant ones) would care more about keeping their jobs than having some guts to do what's right. As a mother,I too feel alarmed at any young child being harmed.

    The registry could work much better by getting the people off it who are NOT DANGEROUS! To learn more about what works/what doesn’t go to: http://www.reformsexoffenderlaws.org/index.php
    MYTHS AND FACTS ABOUT SEX OFFENDERS
    http://www.csom.org/pubs/mythsfacts.html

    http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/columnist…
    http://www.economist.com/displaystory.cfm?story…

    http://www.economist.com/opinion/displaystory.c…

  • suetiggers

    Adams'laws &similar ones have NOT been successful at protecting children more. Putting more and more NON-DANGEROUS people on the registry, takes up more time by law enforcement & the courts. Too many crimes that used to be misdemeanors are now felonies. This creates more fear but less understanding of the problem.
    NON-DANGEROUS people on the registry take attention away from those who REALLY need closer observation (i.e.Garrido case).These type of “stranger-danger” cases arouse strong emotion but they are actually a small minority of sex offenders. Most are WITHIN FAMILIES or a neighbor or someone the child or their family KNOWS. This is counter to public opinion. But, the laws should not be changed according to hysteria,i.e. Nancy Grace and Fox drama-driven, sound-bite “news” stories. And of course, opportunistic politicians love it. There are much better ways to deal with this problem. Countries like England,Scotland&Canada are doing good work. COSA is an example that works with potentially dangerous sex offenders. People that think pedophiles can't be changed do not know what they're talking about. It's a small fraction that can't. Many can. (but not by prison, even though they belong there if they're dangerous.) Most, however, get out, so let's get real and get any of them help who want it so they do not reoffend.

  • http://www.best-registrycleaner.net Best Registry Cleaner

    The idea is to notify law enforcement officials in those countries that people are traveling.

Categories & Tags: Criminal Justice| |