<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Campaign finance reports show Bouchard campaign has hired &#8216;hit man&#8217; political firm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michiganmessenger.com/34437/campaign-finance-reports-show-bouchard-campaign-has-hired-hit-man-political-firm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michiganmessenger.com/34437/campaign-finance-reports-show-bouchard-campaign-has-hired-hit-man-political-firm</link>
	<description>The Michigan Messenger is a local news site covering politics and policy throughout Michigan.  Its team delivers original reporting daily.  The Michigan Messenger is published by the nonpartisan and nonprofit group American Independent News Network.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 16:19:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mossman72</title>
		<link>http://michiganmessenger.com/34437/campaign-finance-reports-show-bouchard-campaign-has-hired-hit-man-political-firm/comment-page-1#comment-17434</link>
		<dc:creator>mossman72</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 23:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michiganmessenger.com/?p=34437#comment-17434</guid>
		<description>Why are the Republicans almost always the party most likely to run nasty, hateful, and devisive campaign ads?  I remember the smear job done on John McCain in South Carolina back in 2000 and the mugging of Max Cleland.  The only good thing that come out of this is that Bouchard convinces enough republicants to not vote for the slime bag Mike Cox.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are the Republicans almost always the party most likely to run nasty, hateful, and devisive campaign ads?  I remember the smear job done on John McCain in South Carolina back in 2000 and the mugging of Max Cleland.  The only good thing that come out of this is that Bouchard convinces enough republicants to not vote for the slime bag Mike Cox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mossman72</title>
		<link>http://michiganmessenger.com/34437/campaign-finance-reports-show-bouchard-campaign-has-hired-hit-man-political-firm/comment-page-1#comment-15311</link>
		<dc:creator>mossman72</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 18:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michiganmessenger.com/?p=34437#comment-15311</guid>
		<description>Why are the Republicans almost always the party most likely to run nasty, hateful, and devisive campaign ads?  I remember the smear job done on John McCain in South Carolina back in 2000 and the mugging of Max Cleland.  I&#039;m already voting for the jerk Mike Cox, but this now places Bouchard on my black list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are the Republicans almost always the party most likely to run nasty, hateful, and devisive campaign ads?  I remember the smear job done on John McCain in South Carolina back in 2000 and the mugging of Max Cleland.  I&#39;m already voting for the jerk Mike Cox, but this now places Bouchard on my black list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

