<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Detroit&#8217;s unemployment rate is probably near 50 percent</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michiganmessenger.com/31983/detroits-unemployment-rate-is-probably-near-50-percent/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michiganmessenger.com/31983/detroits-unemployment-rate-is-probably-near-50-percent</link>
	<description>The Michigan Messenger is a local news site covering politics and policy throughout Michigan.  Its team delivers original reporting daily.  The Michigan Messenger is published by the nonpartisan and nonprofit group American Independent News Network.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 16:19:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jacobhelms</title>
		<link>http://michiganmessenger.com/31983/detroits-unemployment-rate-is-probably-near-50-percent/comment-page-1#comment-19596</link>
		<dc:creator>jacobhelms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 04:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michiganmessenger.com/?p=31983#comment-19596</guid>
		<description>Legalize and tax drugs.The time is now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Legalize and tax drugs.The time is now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete_Murphy</title>
		<link>http://michiganmessenger.com/31983/detroits-unemployment-rate-is-probably-near-50-percent/comment-page-1#comment-17085</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete_Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 01:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michiganmessenger.com/?p=31983#comment-17085</guid>
		<description>Unemployment, both in the U.S. and the world as a whole, marches ever higher because the field of economics doesn&#039;t account for the relationship between population density and per capita consumption.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Following the beating the field of economics took over the seeming failure of Malthus&#039; theory, economists adamantly refuse to ever again consider the effects of population growth.  If they did, they might come to understand that once an optimum population density is breached, further over-crowding begins to erode per capita consumption and, consequently, per capita employment.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And these effects of an excessive population density are actually imported when a nation like the U.S. attempts to trade freely with other nations much more densely populated - nations like China, Japan, Germany, Korea and a host of others.  The result is an automatic trade deficit and loss of jobs - tantamount to economic suicide.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Using 2006 data, an in-depth analysis reveals that, of our top twenty per capita trade deficits in manufactured goods (the trade deficit divided by the population of the country in question), eighteen are with nations much more densely populated than our own. Even more revealing, if the nations of the world are divided equally around the median population density, the U.S. had a trade surplus in manufactured goods of $17 billion with the half of nations below the median population density. With the half above the median, we had a $480 billion deficit!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you‘re interested in learning more about this important new economic theory, then I invite you to visit my web site at &lt;a href=&quot;http://PeteMurphy.wordpress.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://PeteMurphy.wordpress.com&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;Pete Murphy&lt;br&gt;Author, &quot;Five Short Blasts&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unemployment, both in the U.S. and the world as a whole, marches ever higher because the field of economics doesn&#39;t account for the relationship between population density and per capita consumption.  </p>
<p>Following the beating the field of economics took over the seeming failure of Malthus&#39; theory, economists adamantly refuse to ever again consider the effects of population growth.  If they did, they might come to understand that once an optimum population density is breached, further over-crowding begins to erode per capita consumption and, consequently, per capita employment.  </p>
<p>And these effects of an excessive population density are actually imported when a nation like the U.S. attempts to trade freely with other nations much more densely populated &#8211; nations like China, Japan, Germany, Korea and a host of others.  The result is an automatic trade deficit and loss of jobs &#8211; tantamount to economic suicide.  </p>
<p>Using 2006 data, an in-depth analysis reveals that, of our top twenty per capita trade deficits in manufactured goods (the trade deficit divided by the population of the country in question), eighteen are with nations much more densely populated than our own. Even more revealing, if the nations of the world are divided equally around the median population density, the U.S. had a trade surplus in manufactured goods of $17 billion with the half of nations below the median population density. With the half above the median, we had a $480 billion deficit!</p>
<p>If you‘re interested in learning more about this important new economic theory, then I invite you to visit my web site at <a href="http://PeteMurphy.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">http://PeteMurphy.wordpress.com</a>.<br />Pete Murphy<br />Author, &#8220;Five Short Blasts&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete_Murphy</title>
		<link>http://michiganmessenger.com/31983/detroits-unemployment-rate-is-probably-near-50-percent/comment-page-1#comment-13588</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete_Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 20:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michiganmessenger.com/?p=31983#comment-13588</guid>
		<description>Unemployment, both in the U.S. and the world as a whole, marches ever higher because the field of economics doesn&#039;t account for the relationship between population density and per capita consumption.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Following the beating the field of economics took over the seeming failure of Malthus&#039; theory, economists adamantly refuse to ever again consider the effects of population growth.  If they did, they might come to understand that once an optimum population density is breached, further over-crowding begins to erode per capita consumption and, consequently, per capita employment.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And these effects of an excessive population density are actually imported when a nation like the U.S. attempts to trade freely with other nations much more densely populated - nations like China, Japan, Germany, Korea and a host of others.  The result is an automatic trade deficit and loss of jobs - tantamount to economic suicide.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Using 2006 data, an in-depth analysis reveals that, of our top twenty per capita trade deficits in manufactured goods (the trade deficit divided by the population of the country in question), eighteen are with nations much more densely populated than our own. Even more revealing, if the nations of the world are divided equally around the median population density, the U.S. had a trade surplus in manufactured goods of $17 billion with the half of nations below the median population density. With the half above the median, we had a $480 billion deficit!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you‘re interested in learning more about this important new economic theory, then I invite you to visit my web site at &lt;a href=&quot;http://PeteMurphy.wordpress.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://PeteMurphy.wordpress.com&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;Pete Murphy&lt;br&gt;Author, &quot;Five Short Blasts&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unemployment, both in the U.S. and the world as a whole, marches ever higher because the field of economics doesn&#39;t account for the relationship between population density and per capita consumption.  </p>
<p>Following the beating the field of economics took over the seeming failure of Malthus&#39; theory, economists adamantly refuse to ever again consider the effects of population growth.  If they did, they might come to understand that once an optimum population density is breached, further over-crowding begins to erode per capita consumption and, consequently, per capita employment.  </p>
<p>And these effects of an excessive population density are actually imported when a nation like the U.S. attempts to trade freely with other nations much more densely populated &#8211; nations like China, Japan, Germany, Korea and a host of others.  The result is an automatic trade deficit and loss of jobs &#8211; tantamount to economic suicide.  </p>
<p>Using 2006 data, an in-depth analysis reveals that, of our top twenty per capita trade deficits in manufactured goods (the trade deficit divided by the population of the country in question), eighteen are with nations much more densely populated than our own. Even more revealing, if the nations of the world are divided equally around the median population density, the U.S. had a trade surplus in manufactured goods of $17 billion with the half of nations below the median population density. With the half above the median, we had a $480 billion deficit!</p>
<p>If you‘re interested in learning more about this important new economic theory, then I invite you to visit my web site at <a href="http://PeteMurphy.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">http://PeteMurphy.wordpress.com</a>.<br />Pete Murphy<br />Author, &#8220;Five Short Blasts&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: melpol</title>
		<link>http://michiganmessenger.com/31983/detroits-unemployment-rate-is-probably-near-50-percent/comment-page-1#comment-13540</link>
		<dc:creator>melpol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 00:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michiganmessenger.com/?p=31983#comment-13540</guid>
		<description>Turning areas of Detroit into red light districts will put thousands of the unemployed to work. With police approval jobs will be open for pimps,hookers, and drug dealers. No capital investment will be needed, and the new Detroit will attract fun loving customers from all over the world. Poverty will be gone along with the religious leaders that would rather see high unemployment than sin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Turning areas of Detroit into red light districts will put thousands of the unemployed to work. With police approval jobs will be open for pimps,hookers, and drug dealers. No capital investment will be needed, and the new Detroit will attract fun loving customers from all over the world. Poverty will be gone along with the religious leaders that would rather see high unemployment than sin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

