<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Lansing FOIA policies to be developed behind closed doors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michiganmessenger.com/30732/new-lansing-foia-policies-to-be-developed-behind-closed-doors/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michiganmessenger.com/30732/new-lansing-foia-policies-to-be-developed-behind-closed-doors</link>
	<description>The Michigan Messenger is a local news site covering politics and policy throughout Michigan.  Its team delivers original reporting daily.  The Michigan Messenger is published by the nonpartisan and nonprofit group American Independent News Network.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 16:19:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: northcoast</title>
		<link>http://michiganmessenger.com/30732/new-lansing-foia-policies-to-be-developed-behind-closed-doors/comment-page-1#comment-17457</link>
		<dc:creator>northcoast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michiganmessenger.com/?p=30732#comment-17457</guid>
		<description>To say that an effort to develop a policy about releasing information to the public must be developed without the public&#039;s knowledge is to admit that the ultimate goal is to avoid releasing information. A policy created under such circumstances could conceivably allow wholesale refusal to release information that should be produced in response to a lawful request. There ALREADY IS a policy about releasing information in response to a lawful and proper FOIA request; that &quot;policy&quot; is contained in the FOIA act itself. This is stonewalling, and a waste of time and money, and an effort to look busy while doing nothing. Appalling. Thanks to Mich Mess for publicizing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To say that an effort to develop a policy about releasing information to the public must be developed without the public&#39;s knowledge is to admit that the ultimate goal is to avoid releasing information. A policy created under such circumstances could conceivably allow wholesale refusal to release information that should be produced in response to a lawful request. There ALREADY IS a policy about releasing information in response to a lawful and proper FOIA request; that &#8220;policy&#8221; is contained in the FOIA act itself. This is stonewalling, and a waste of time and money, and an effort to look busy while doing nothing. Appalling. Thanks to Mich Mess for publicizing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: northcoast</title>
		<link>http://michiganmessenger.com/30732/new-lansing-foia-policies-to-be-developed-behind-closed-doors/comment-page-1#comment-12956</link>
		<dc:creator>northcoast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 12:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michiganmessenger.com/?p=30732#comment-12956</guid>
		<description>To say that an effort to develop a policy about releasing information to the public must be developed without the public&#039;s knowledge is to admit that the ultimate goal is to avoid releasing information. A policy created under such circumstances could conceivably allow wholesale refusal to release information that should be produced in response to a lawful request. There ALREADY IS a policy about releasing information in response to a lawful and proper FOIA request; that &quot;policy&quot; is contained in the FOIA act itself. This is stonewalling, and a waste of time and money, and an effort to look busy while doing nothing. Appalling. Thanks to Mich Mess for publicizing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To say that an effort to develop a policy about releasing information to the public must be developed without the public&#39;s knowledge is to admit that the ultimate goal is to avoid releasing information. A policy created under such circumstances could conceivably allow wholesale refusal to release information that should be produced in response to a lawful request. There ALREADY IS a policy about releasing information in response to a lawful and proper FOIA request; that &#8220;policy&#8221; is contained in the FOIA act itself. This is stonewalling, and a waste of time and money, and an effort to look busy while doing nothing. Appalling. Thanks to Mich Mess for publicizing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bonniebucqueroux</title>
		<link>http://michiganmessenger.com/30732/new-lansing-foia-policies-to-be-developed-behind-closed-doors/comment-page-1#comment-12898</link>
		<dc:creator>bonniebucqueroux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michiganmessenger.com/?p=30732#comment-12898</guid>
		<description>It would seem to be a simple matter to remind the police department not to reveal the HIV status of people with whom they interact. (It might be even wiser for them to avoid similar stings, but that&#039;s another matter.) My concern with their desire to make the meeting private is that other press freedoms risk being lost in the process. Isn&#039;t transparency the goal?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would seem to be a simple matter to remind the police department not to reveal the HIV status of people with whom they interact. (It might be even wiser for them to avoid similar stings, but that&#39;s another matter.) My concern with their desire to make the meeting private is that other press freedoms risk being lost in the process. Isn&#39;t transparency the goal?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neeson02</title>
		<link>http://michiganmessenger.com/30732/new-lansing-foia-policies-to-be-developed-behind-closed-doors/comment-page-1#comment-12892</link>
		<dc:creator>neeson02</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michiganmessenger.com/?p=30732#comment-12892</guid>
		<description>Personally I also think that this type of act will be necessary. This will create transparency in creating information policy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I also think that this type of act will be necessary. This will create transparency in creating information policy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

