Top Stories

The Michigan Messenger going forward

By Staff Report | 11.16.11

I am writing today to announce the closure of the Michigan Messenger. After four years of operation in Michigan, the board of the American Independent News Network, has decided to shift publication of its news into a single site, The American Independent at Americanindependent.com. This is part of a shift in strategy, towards new forms [...]

Colorado-based abstinence program provided false and misleading information to Michigan students

HIV-AIDS-small
By Todd A. Heywood | 11.16.11

An abstinence-only presentation provided to numerous school districts in Calhoun and Eaton Counties in October of this year provided false and misleading information to students about HIV, experts allege.

Class action lawsuit filed against MERS over unpaid taxes

foreclosure
By Todd A. Heywood | 11.15.11

Two county registers of deeds filed a class action lawsuit Monday on behalf of Michigan’s 83 counties alleging that the Mortgage Electronic Registration Services owes millions of dollars in property title transfer taxes.

Schuette fights important mercury regulations

epa_logo
By Eartha Jane Melzer | 11.14.11

Despite evidence of the impact of mercury on children and public health, Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette last month joined with 24 other state attorneys general in filing a lawsuit to scuttle new EPA regulations that would reduce mercury emissions from power plants.

New GOP proposal on school cuts

By Ed Brayton | 11.11.09 | 7:11 am

With a Nov. 21 deadline looming for the legislature to restore hundreds of millions of dollars in cuts to K-12 school funding, one Republican Senator has come up with an idea for how to raise the revenue to do so: Make the teachers pay for it. Peter Luke reports at MLive.com:

Senate Majority Leader Michael Bishop, R-Rochester, said there is no support in his caucus for raising taxes beyond the measures approved last month that freeze income tax credits but are tied to business tax cuts. He also opposes last week’s House move to give more money to schools by simply tapping federal economic stimulus funds being reserved for next school year.

Sen. Alan Sanborn, R-Richmond, told Macomb County parents Tuesday that he’s reintroducing a measure that would require all public employees in Michigan, including school personnel, to pay 15 percent of their health insurance. He said the school aid fund alone would realize $350 million in savings.

“If you guys back me up on this, we can get it done,” Sanborn told them. “This is a structural solution without raising taxes.”

Except that it is, in fact, a tax. It’s a tax on teachers, making them bear the full burden of restoring those budget cuts so the legislature doesn’t have to spread that burden among the rest of the state’s citizens. Here’s the only other solution being offered by the GOP:

Senate Majority Leader Michael Bishop, R-Rochester, said there is no support in his caucus for raising taxes beyond the measures approved last month that freeze income tax credits but are tied to business tax cuts.

That bill, which the House has balked at, would freeze the income tax credits for the state’s poorest residents and push up their tax burden while reducing the tax burden on businesses and the wealthy. So those appear to be the only two choices the Republicans are willing to offer – let the poor pay for education or let the teachers pay for education.

Comments

  • mediawatcher

    The arguement you are using that an increase in insurance contributions by teachers is a tax is debatable. When a government raises a service fee to cover the cost of the service, then it is only eliminating a subsidy. It is unfortunate that health care costs are the problem with every employee regardless of who employes them.

    In the private sector. When these costs rise they can
    1) pass them along to the employees
    2) absorb them
    3) increase their revenue structure and hope they keep customers

    In no way can they mandate that their customers pay more, and not opt out. This is what a tax increase will do.

    User fees, which an increase in contributions to ones own health care can be argued to be, are much more fair. The ones receiving the benefit are the ones paying for it. If no other worker in the state other than public employees were being asked to up their contributions for health insurance a stonger argument against this bill could be made.

  • mediawatcher

    The arguement you are using that an increase in insurance contributions by teachers is a tax is debatable. When a government raises a service fee to cover the cost of the service, then it is only eliminating a subsidy. It is unfortunate that health care costs are the problem with every employee regardless of who employes them.

    In the private sector. When these costs rise they can
    1) pass them along to the employees
    2) absorb them
    3) increase their revenue structure and hope they keep customers

    In no way can they mandate that their customers pay more, and not opt out. This is what a tax increase will do.

    User fees, which an increase in contributions to ones own health care can be argued to be, are much more fair. The ones receiving the benefit are the ones paying for it. If no other worker in the state other than public employees were being asked to up their contributions for health insurance a stonger argument against this bill could be made.

Categories & Tags: | | |