After Proposal 2 passed in November 2004, there was a great deal of confusion among voters about what exactly they had voted for. They had been repeatedly told by those who advocated the measure that it would only prohibit gay marriage and would not have any effect on domestic partnership benefits offered by public employers, but almost immediately after the election the new state employee’s union contract had been stripped of such benefits pending a judicial determination on the scope and reach of the new law’s language. Even some who strongly opposed gay marriage expressed concern. The Detroit News contacted people who had voted for the amendment and found that many of them said they would not have supported it had they known it might void such contracts. Said one: