Top Stories

The Michigan Messenger going forward

By Staff Report | 11.16.11

I am writing today to announce the closure of the Michigan Messenger. After four years of operation in Michigan, the board of the American Independent News Network, has decided to shift publication of its news into a single site, The American Independent at Americanindependent.com. This is part of a shift in strategy, towards new forms [...]

Colorado-based abstinence program provided false and misleading information to Michigan students

HIV-AIDS-small
By Todd A. Heywood | 11.16.11

An abstinence-only presentation provided to numerous school districts in Calhoun and Eaton Counties in October of this year provided false and misleading information to students about HIV, experts allege.

Class action lawsuit filed against MERS over unpaid taxes

foreclosure
By Todd A. Heywood | 11.15.11

Two county registers of deeds filed a class action lawsuit Monday on behalf of Michigan’s 83 counties alleging that the Mortgage Electronic Registration Services owes millions of dollars in property title transfer taxes.

Schuette fights important mercury regulations

epa_logo
By Eartha Jane Melzer | 11.14.11

Despite evidence of the impact of mercury on children and public health, Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette last month joined with 24 other state attorneys general in filing a lawsuit to scuttle new EPA regulations that would reduce mercury emissions from power plants.

Targeted transgender community speaks out in advance of vote

By David Alire Garcia | 10.30.09 | 1:02 pm
Creative Commons Photo by fadogirl/Flickr

(Creative Commons photo by fadogirl via Flickr)

The new TV ad funded by opponents of Kalamazoo’s proposed anti-discrimination ordinance isn’t all that new. But until next week’s vote, its ability to sway votes in this southwest Michigan city remains a mystery.

The ad, nearly identical to an ad used by opponents of a similar measure on the ballot in Gainesville, Fla., earlier this year, warns viewers that the anti-discrimination ordinance on the ballot in Kalamazoo — which includes protections for gay and transgender people — would allow men to prey on young girls in public bathrooms.

Calls to the main group opposing Ordinance 1856 to explain the ad were not returned this week.

The ad serves once again to highlight the starkly different way both sides in this fight characterize the proposed ordinance — supporters saying it promotes basic fairness and equality, opponents saying it opens the bathroom and locker-room door to “cross-dressing men.”

That divide shows no sign of receding. Nor does the relentless focus on gender identity from the opponents of the ordinance. Meanwhile, very few open transgender men or women have been quoted in traditional media outlets covering the campaign in Kalamazoo.

Michigan Messenger sought out a couple transgender voices from Michigan as the Kalamazoo campaign winds to a close. (Another local transgender voice was featured in this story from earlier in the week.)

“Transgender issues are the hot button issues in this campaign,” Amy Hunter, a transgender woman and Kalamazoo resident, confirmed in a recent interview.

No official number of transgender people in Kalamazoo exists, but Hunter said the number is “at least” in the dozens.

Hunter, 50, an accomplished lighting designer and theater director, says she’s been living as a woman since the morning of Oct. 5, 2006. “When I left to go to work that day, I left the house that day as Amy, and I never ever appeared again in public or private as a male.”

A mustache-less Hunter put on some new clothes and a little makeup, and prepared for an anxious beginning:

That day that I left the house I was fully aware that it could go very badly or it could go OK. I adopted an attitude of, I don’t need to apologize myself anymore. I want to be an effective person. And I know, I absolutely know in my soul, that the only way that’s going to happen is if I live authentically.

Since then, Hunter said she’s experienced no hassles living and working in Kalamazoo, a city she said “has always had a tendency to be a very progressive community.”

Last year, after the initial drafts of the ordinance were being written, Hunter was moved to get involved.

“It came to my attention that the ordinance had been drafted without a transgendered person on the committee,” she said. Hunter was determined to change that, and would later become director of operations for One Kalamazoo, the group supporting Ordinance 1856. She recently resigned, but she said that wasn’t due to any problem with the campaign.

“I’m not a spring chicken anymore,” she laughed. “Campaigning is a young woman’s job.”

Rachel Crandall, a native of Southfield, is the executive director of Transgender Michigan. She’s been publicly advocating for anti-discrimination protections based on sexual orientation and gender identity for at least a decade, she said.

Asked for her reaction to the new TV ad by Kalamazoo Citizens Voting No on Special Rights Discrimination, the group opposing Ordinance 1856, Crandall doesn’t refer to its content.

“My reaction is I wish they could get to know me. Most people who are so anti, are people who really don’t know a trans person,” she said.

Crandall, 49, says she’s determined to educate people about transgendered people — transgendered women in particular.

“These are not just men who wake up one morning and say, ‘I think I’ll wear a dress today,” she said. “These are people, a lot of them who really have been transgendered at least inside for most of their lives, and that’s what we’re trying to educate people about the difference.”

Her personal story, she adds, is similar.

“I’ve always know what I was, and it just began pounding on me from the inside, that I really couldn’t lie about it anymore,” she said. “For so much of my life, I tried to run away from it.”

Both Hunter and Crandall say that the social gains that gays and lesbians have achieved as more and more have become open about their sexual orientation, are just around the corner for the transgender community.

“If you know me, you can’t demonize me,” Hunter said. “It’s impossible.”

Crandall, for her part, lamented what she thinks is the probability that many opponents to Ordinance 1856 have never met a transgendered man or woman. “I really wish that people would just try to go out of their way to actually meet someone,” she said. “But isn’t that what prejudice is all about? Most of the people that people are prejudiced about are people they really don’t know.”

Comments

  • nikkih777

    These clones of Anita Bryant and “pinnacles of Christian virtue” are very selective in which Scriptures that they choose to enforce. The Bible says women should not speak in Church and if they have a complaint or concern then they should bring it up with their husband. I think we all realize that this makes no sense in our current world where women are educated and part of the work force. Thousands of years ago, the writers of the Bible had no understanding of neurobiology, genetics, or psychosexual conditions. For heanens sake, they thought you were demon possessed if you were born left handed…lol. The Scriptures clearly must be understood in the culture, time period, and context that they were written in.

    Surely, the Ten Commandments are the bedrock of JudeoChristian beliefs. The opponents of civil rights for GLBT people seem to forget the 7th Commandment, which is “Thou Shalt Not Lie”. Their distortions of the Truth and political scare tactics are out and out lies and misrepresentations.

  • baronrae

    First, the bible is not dated, it is yesterday, today and tomorrow. If you don't believe this they you cannot believe that it is GOD's word. He is allseeing and knowing.
    Secondly, I am a christian and I agree with the equal rights, because this is a civil rights issue and not about anyones religious beliefs.
    Thirdly, I agree that people do not have anymore to fear from the transgender community then from any other community.
    I do believe this could open the door to TRUE pediphiles possing as a woman, however, this is why people need to go to the bathroom with their children. I make my 7 yr.old son go with me into the women bathroom and I make him come into my stall so he will not invade anyone elses privacy or cause problems.
    The bathroom objection is a “red-herring” to avoid prejudice labeling.
    Please be careful about labeling others as well, because not all christians believe in using the bible as a weapon to “judge”. BTW I am not gay/lesbian nor Trans. I know what it is like to be discriminated against because I am a female mechanic in a man's world.

  • baronrae

    First, the bible is not dated, it is yesterday, today and tomorrow. If you don't believe this they you cannot believe that it is GOD's word. He is allseeing and knowing.
    Secondly, I am a christian and I agree with the equal rights, because this is a civil rights issue and not about anyones religious beliefs.
    Thirdly, I agree that people do not have anymore to fear from the transgender community then from any other community.
    I do believe this could open the door to TRUE pediphiles possing as a woman, however, this is why people need to go to the bathroom with their children. I make my 7 yr.old son go with me into the women bathroom and I make him come into my stall so he will not invade anyone elses privacy or cause problems.
    The bathroom objection is a “red-herring” to avoid prejudice labeling.
    Please be careful about labeling others as well, because not all christians believe in using the bible as a weapon to “judge”. BTW I am not gay/lesbian nor Trans. I know what it is like to be discriminated against because I am a female mechanic in a man's world.

  • Zoe_Brain

    It's not quite true to say that this bill poses zero danger.

    Florida was the scene of one of the ugliest campaigns aimed at distorting the facts. The Gainesville City Council was to vote on amending their discrimination policy to include transgender protections. The culprit here is the organization called Citizens for Good Public Policy.

    Their dirtiest trick was the creation of a video featuring an undesirable man in men’s street clothes lurking by a public bathroom in a park frequented by children. After a five or six year old girl goes into the bathroom, he is seen following her in. The footer reads “Your City Commission Made This Legal”. There is nothing to suggest their odious proposition that passing trans protections will legalize this kind of victimizing behavior.

    The video was copied, and with minor changes to the captions, has been circulated for use elsewhere. You may have seen the version with customised wording for Kalamazoo.

    In a side note, one of the antagonists in this campaign of hate and lies, a CVS manager, admitted to filming women in his store’s restroom. So yes, there is a danger – from the opponents.

    As mean-spirited and nasty as Gainesville, FL., Montgomery County Maryland in metro DC was the scene of an equally disturbing battle. Like Gainesville, the dirtiness of the tactics was extreme, but perhaps even more scary was the degree to which bigots will go to defend their intolerance. The hate-spewing group here calls itself Maryland Citizens for a Responsible Government.

    One of the sleaziest tactics used by MCRG was to send a hetero male, dressed in drag, into a local health club to incite fear and panic. Their ploy was discovered and this group’s cover was blown.

    There have been no incidents involving trans people in the 35 years since such ordnances were first enacted, ordnances that now cover 38% of the US population. Not one.

    There has never been a case of a pervert attempting to use such legislation as a defence, though one was caught in female attire in Washington state, which has such an ordnance. IF there was a real danger, he would at least have attempted to use it – except it's obvious to any legal advisor that it would have been laughed out of court.

    But there have been two cases of opponents of such bills engaging in actual perverse behaviour as part of the smear campaign they've run. So there is a danger there. They have no real incidents, so may try manufacturing them. Again.

  • Zoe_Brain

    It's not quite true to say that this bill poses zero danger.

    Florida was the scene of one of the ugliest campaigns aimed at distorting the facts. The Gainesville City Council was to vote on amending their discrimination policy to include transgender protections. The culprit here is the organization called Citizens for Good Public Policy.

    Their dirtiest trick was the creation of a video featuring an undesirable man in men’s street clothes lurking by a public bathroom in a park frequented by children. After a five or six year old girl goes into the bathroom, he is seen following her in. The footer reads “Your City Commission Made This Legal”. There is nothing to suggest their odious proposition that passing trans protections will legalize this kind of victimizing behavior.

    The video was copied, and with minor changes to the captions, has been circulated for use elsewhere. You may have seen the version with customised wording for Kalamazoo.

    In a side note, one of the antagonists in this campaign of hate and lies, a CVS manager, admitted to filming women in his store’s restroom. So yes, there is a danger – from the opponents.

    As mean-spirited and nasty as Gainesville, FL., Montgomery County Maryland in metro DC was the scene of an equally disturbing battle. Like Gainesville, the dirtiness of the tactics was extreme, but perhaps even more scary was the degree to which bigots will go to defend their intolerance. The hate-spewing group here calls itself Maryland Citizens for a Responsible Government.

    One of the sleaziest tactics used by MCRG was to send a hetero male, dressed in drag, into a local health club to incite fear and panic. Their ploy was discovered and this group’s cover was blown.

    There have been no incidents involving trans people in the 35 years since such ordnances were first enacted, ordnances that now cover 38% of the US population. Not one.

    There has never been a case of a pervert attempting to use such legislation as a defence, though one was caught in female attire in Washington state, which has such an ordnance. IF there was a real danger, he would at least have attempted to use it – except it's obvious to any legal advisor that it would have been laughed out of court.

    But there have been two cases of opponents of such bills engaging in actual perverse behaviour as part of the smear campaign they've run. So there is a danger there. They have no real incidents, so may try manufacturing them. Again.