Top Stories

The Michigan Messenger going forward

By Staff Report | 11.16.11

I am writing today to announce the closure of the Michigan Messenger. After four years of operation in Michigan, the board of the American Independent News Network, has decided to shift publication of its news into a single site, The American Independent at Americanindependent.com. This is part of a shift in strategy, towards new forms [...]

Colorado-based abstinence program provided false and misleading information to Michigan students

HIV-AIDS-small
By Todd A. Heywood | 11.16.11

An abstinence-only presentation provided to numerous school districts in Calhoun and Eaton Counties in October of this year provided false and misleading information to students about HIV, experts allege.

Class action lawsuit filed against MERS over unpaid taxes

foreclosure
By Todd A. Heywood | 11.15.11

Two county registers of deeds filed a class action lawsuit Monday on behalf of Michigan’s 83 counties alleging that the Mortgage Electronic Registration Services owes millions of dollars in property title transfer taxes.

Schuette fights important mercury regulations

epa_logo
By Eartha Jane Melzer | 11.14.11

Despite evidence of the impact of mercury on children and public health, Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette last month joined with 24 other state attorneys general in filing a lawsuit to scuttle new EPA regulations that would reduce mercury emissions from power plants.

Emotional community addresses Haslett school board over drunk shaming

By Ed Brayton | 10.27.09 | 7:39 am
Photo by Ed Brayton

Members of the Haslett Board of Education met on Monday evening. (Photo by Ed Brayton/Michigan Messenger)

MERIDIAN TOWNSHIP — The room where the Haslett Board of Education meets has 116 seats, the majority of which sit empty during most of their bimonthly meetings. But Monday night was no ordinary school board meeting — it was the first meeting after revelations of drunk shaming, drug use and alleged sexual assault by a group of teachers divided this upscale mid-Michigan community near East Lansing.

On the right side of the room, next to where board members sit, is a large two-part poster titled “Character counts in Haslett.” The poster says, among other virtues, “We teach responsibility” and “We respect ourselves and others.” Students, the second part of the poster says, must “demonstrate the ability to make wise choices regarding personal health, safety and happiness.”

Monday night it was standing-room only as residents packed the room, many of them hoping to speak their minds to the board about the drunk shaming incident after Superintendent Mike Duda gave a short speech addressing the incident that has caused so much controversy over the last few weeks since Michigan Messenger first reported on the situation.

Duda began by making a statement similar to the one he released publicly on the school’s website on Oct. 13, saying that he is “angry and upset about what happened two years ago” and calling the incident “offensive behavior by people we trust to have better judgment than what they displayed that evening at that party.”

Duda reiterated the school’s position that it was told by legal counsel that it had “no legal standing to take action against the staff members who attended a private party on private property” and signaled that the administration considers any investigation of the teachers involved in the incident to be off the table at this point:

At this point, the district has no legal recourse to take action toward any staff member who allegedly attended that private party held on private property. If criminal wrongdoing by anyone involved is found, we will not hesitate to take disciplinary action.

After Duda spoke, Board President Rob Fowler then began calling up those in the audience who had requested an opportunity to speak.

One of the first to do so was Frank Ravitch, a professor at the Michigan State University School of Law who has children in Haslett schools and who has served as legal counsel to school boards in other states. Ravitch disagreed with Duda and said the school had other options short of firing the teachers involved.

In an interview with Michigan Messenger after the meeting, Ravitch said: “I think given the collective bargaining agreement, termination would be out of the question and inappropriate here, but there are others ways to discipline potentially. There are possibilities for discipline less than termination, including putting a letter in their file. The most important thing is counseling — alcohol counseling, drug counseling and I think also sensitivity counseling. That’s something that, when I represented school boards, we recommended quite a bit.”

The personnel files of the teachers involved, which Michigan Messenger obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request, show no discipline of any type was handed out, despite the fact that three of the teachers involved — Brian Town and Tim Beebe and the victim, Veronica Piechotte — had all gone to school administrators within days of the incident and told them what had happened at the party. There were no letters in the file referring to the incident and no counseling sessions required of anyone involved.

The opinions expressed by community members at the meeting were mixed. Several former students stood up to speak on behalf of the teachers who participated in the drunk shaming. Andrew Izzo called Town an “amazing person who has made a large impact on my life and the lives of my friends.” Erin Johnson said of Town: “He touches everyone he meets in some way.”

One mother named Carol said that the lack of any consequences for the teachers involved in this incident was troubling, saying the school has “one set of standards for the students and what appears to the students to be another set of standards for the teachers and staff.”

“I’ve lost the trust that I had in this school system with my child,” the mother said, “and I think many other parents have lost that sense of trust. Any professional occupation has a code of ethics or character with consequences when that code is breached. And what I can’t find here is the professionalism, the ethics, the code of character to ask people to be responsible for their actions.”

Scott Ray, another Haslett parent, responded to those who defended the teachers as good people, agreeing with them but arguing that it wasn’t really relevant to the situation at hand. “I know that some of these teachers are good people,” Ray said, “but if consequences only apply to bad people who do bad things then our courts would be a lot more clear and we wouldn’t have half the people in jail. We all make mistakes, but you have to pay for mistakes, especially repeated mistakes. Someone justified their actions by saying heck, we’ve all been drunk to the point of passing out and been written on. I think that speaks to a pattern that is very disturbing.”

Charles Rice, who also has children in Haslett schools, told the board that he was “disappointed, angry and confused about the whole issue.” And while due process was important, he said, “protecting our students should supercede protecting our teachers.”

The audience was respectful and there was applause after many of the statements. The only tense moment was when Steve Lampman, a father with three kids in Haslett schools, said that while he has “an expectation that teachers are role models for my children and that they recognize that responsibility,” the school had been “dragged into this as a result of one person’s attempt at extortion.” That comment got some applause along with a fair amount of muttering and gasping by those in attendance.

After the public comments were over, the board proceeded to other business, hearing from the school’s finance director about impending budget cuts, but they returned to the drunk shaming incident again shortly. Fowler, the board president, told the audience: “We lack actual facts. We have no more facts today than we had two weeks ago or two years ago.”

After the meeting in a brief interview with Michigan Messenger, Fowler said that while it’s true that the school now has the police report, all of the names were blacked out so they don’t know who did what. He retrieved their copy of the police report to confirm that. In the copy of the police report obtained by Michigan Messenger from the victim in this case, none of the names are redacted and the statements of each participant are attributed directly to them.

Because of the lack of specifics in their copy of the police report, Fowler said, school officials were focused on moving forward and preventing similar incidents from happening again rather than on handing out any discipline. “We’re going to ask Kristin Beltzer, who chairs our Policy and Personnel Committee, to do a comprehensive review of our policies,” Fowler said, “to take a look at our code of conduct and some of the other issues mentioned here tonight and ask the question, ‘What can we do when people we expect to be role models, to represent our district, what policies and procedures are in place that allow us to react to public bad behavior while still offering due process to those who are involved?’ The Policy and Personnel committee will take that up.”

He also said that the scheduled Nov. 9 school board meeting would be a “working session,” which he defined as “basically an opportunity for us in a much less formal environment to have a conversation about going forward.” That meeting is also open to the public, he made clear, and invited those with ideas to return and speak their mind again.

Comments

  • Intelmom

    It would appear that HPS has received poor legal advice. More noteworthy, it continues to accept it. I would be curious to know how much money this district has spent on retaining legal counsel. Perhaps exploring other otpions for counsel should be a priority. This community applauds the efforts of the countless dedicated staff who were NOT part of this unfortunate incident and taking corrective and disciplinary action against those who behaved so horribly supports our teachers and staff. I don't believe that there is a parent in this community who would not endorse the actions of the majority of teachers who continue to shepherd our kids towards making responsible choices. Hence, the frustration with administration and the Board for doing nothing.
    Mr. Duda contends that the district's hands were tied, however, evidence and opinion would suggest that this is not the true case nor an appropriate action.Due process should never be sacrificed for any party, but it seems pretty obvious that bad behavior in this situation is a fact and requires no further burden of proof. A picture says a thousand words…dirty words in this case. After nearly two and half years of inactivity, this community has little faith that any appropriate action will be taken against these teachers despite Mr. Duda's lip service regarding his disgust with those who perpetuated this act. Really? Is that why he personally followed it with a presentation insulting both parents and foreign speakers? There is much work to be done in this district to mend the wounds, but I truly believe that it can be done. This is a strong community who supports it's school district, it's staff and above all, it forgives….

  • PhilRutkowski

    My name is Phil Rutkowski.

    On October 17th, the Michigan Messenger published an article titled “Haslett Teacher Reveals Drunk Shaming by Fellow Emplopyees. In the article, the reporter wrote the following: “McKinney and his wife, as well as Etheridge and staff member Phil Rutkowski watched the drawing.” This statement is factually incorrect. I was not in the house during the incident. Instead, I was sitting at a bonfire in Dan McKinney’s backyard. I was unaware of what was happening inside the house and did not see anyone write on Ms. Piechotte.

    My involvement that night was limited to driving Ms. Piechotte & Ms. Etheridge home as I believed it was not in their best interest to do so themselves.

    These facts have been corroborated by numerous witnesses and can be easily verified. I anticipate and appreciate the Messenger's immediate response to correct the inaccurate information published in the Oct 17th article.

    • ebrayton

      Thank you for the clarification, Mr. Rutkoswki. We have updated the original piece with the following editor's note at the mention of your name:

      Editor's note: Although the police report contains conflicting testimony on who was in the room at any given time while the actual drunk shaming was occurring, Rutkowski says that he was not present at all while the incident took place, but was rather outside at the bonfire and only later did he go inside. His only role, he says, was driving Piechotte and Etheridge home because he felt it was unsafe for them to drive.

  • midMichigan

    I was there and I heard a lot of deflection going on in the school board meeting last night. The president of the board indicated the matter was partly touched off by new media with inappropriate standards in mid-Michigan. He will not allow the whole affair, he vowed, to de-center his focus on the real challenge, which is the budget — as if one can't hold two ideas in one's head at the same time and cope with two challenges.

    The superintendent hid behind alleged legal counsel advice and failed to comment on the factual statement from a law school professor and parent in the audience that he'd actually received improper or narrow advice and that there was a whole arena of personnel practice and action possible to discipline or put teachers on notice short of termination of employment. Nothing was placed in their files, nothing was done to place them on notice, nothing was done to remove them from voluntary activities. The superintendence expressed his feelings about the event — “obnoxious” — but has to date taken no effective action in a matter pending two years on something he finds so “obnoxious.”

    A misguided parent with attitude started off talking constructively about
    “responsibility” but then thought it was all a matter of “extortion” by the vicrtim in the case — thereby offering defamation as a solution to a public problem. Other parents engaged in much too easy forgiveness, forgetting that it is not theirs to forgive when an incident happens to another.

    One parent actually talked about refusing to look at the sordid pictures. But such pictures are obviously part of the incident, forensic evidence of a sort. Here we see teachers marking the body of a fellow teacher who is in no condition to give her consent. They draw obscene images and write obscene words and mark her body that they were there. The images are also commentaries on their ambivalent relationship to a person who is openly gay. And then finally they take pictures — why? — so they can relive the moment and share it with others? So they can remember it and enjoy it?

    Something really pretty serious happened in Haslett. But there are too many people seeking to get beyond community embarassment, to manage and sanitize the news, to sustain district reputation and get to other matters, while, in my opinion, there are not enough people addressing what happened, what it meant, what it continues to mean, and what are the range of possible remedies. There are too many people hiding behind the failure of county officials to prosecute or act efficiently (so then there was no crime and we can all forget about it), and too many people finding in the ways the news finally got out the supposed real story as a substitute for the actual one.

    A healthy school district and its administration and board confront a challenge when it arises, do not sanitize it, deal with it directly and creatively. They use it to shine a light of self-criticism on the people involved, the institution, its leadership, and even district, and they learn from it and make of it a broader educating experience to make real things better — not just manage the news.

    • hasletite

      I was there also, though it appeared quite differently to me. With two children currently in the school system I was all ears.

      I didn't see the 'deflection' or 'hiding' on Mr Dudas part that you describe. On the contrary. Taking actions that would precipitate lawsuits that the district would clearly lose seems to me a pretty irresponsible path to consider. With three prosecutors reviewing and backing away from it there was hardly legal legs to stand on with which to take the action you speak of. If it is such a clear cut case, why have they all backed away? Add to that, as was repeatedly mentioned, the events are completely outside the board’s jurisdiction. I'm mystified as to how you arrive at your conclusion.

      I don’t condone what happened. The behavior was indefensible. But so also is the embellishment of how awful the incident was. You make the shaming sound like they water boarded her hours after a hearty torturing session and then sent her home. It should be acknowledged that Ms. Piechotte was hardly Mother Teresa in this story. By her own admission, she got drunk, got high, and passed out. The reality is that consenting adults, drank too much, did stupid things, and decided to bring a camera. The whole incident is an embarrassment for everyone. Nothing more, nothing less. If this is as serious a story as you describe then the journalists of the world need to spend a lot more time in bars and at parties where they’ll find a target rich environment to catch the next eye popping news flash.

      The natural consequences of these events have caused the teachers involved, and their families a 'shaming' of their own at least equal to that of Ms. Piechotte. And certainly their poor judgment outstripped hers.

      Those that know the teachers well (some spoke on their behalf at the meeting) do not want to see their careers thrown away over a lapse of judgment. Until this event, they have led successful careers, dedicated to the development of our youth. If anything is to be done, it should be something that leaves a pathway for all of them to recover their names and vocation. It should also be free of all of the political agendas. Cumulatively, they have many good years of service yet to give. It would be an additional tragedy to throw them away in anger.

      Lastly, with regard to ambivalence toward an openly gay person. I don’t think it was ambivalence rather than it being treated as the non-issue which I believe it was. What happened was wrong without regard to any specific personal detail or details of anyone involved.

      It’s here we see the real life consequence of poor choices. In making the best of things, it has prompted some very healthy conversations with our children at the dinner table.

  • MoralitySeeker

    Certainly the Haslett School District will want to review policy and code of conduct, though there is already a code of conduct that could have been addressed two years ago.

    However, if the board focuses only on policy without addressing the culture that
    1. allows some teachers to conduct themselves inappropriately through their emails, behavior in classes, in staff meetings, and with students, while certain others are written up for minor or nonexistent infractions, and given ultimatums to encourage them to leave the district,

    2. assures that students face consequences for unacceptable behavior, while taking no action when teachers engage in illegal and violent behavior,

    3. chooses an expedient route of inaction and secrecy rather than the more difficult, but ultimately more courageous and moral path of action and transparency,

    4. fosters a climate where students, parents and staff cannot openly express concerns about unfair practices for fear of retaliation,

    5. treats victims (students as well as staff) as villains in hopes that they will simply “go away,”

    6. puts the reputation of the district before the well-being of students and staff,

    no systemic change will occur.

    Two years ago, Haslett Public Schools had an opportunity to do the right thing, but chose to sweep the situation under the rug. They have been given another chance . . . I sincerely hope the result of their current efforts will not simply be revised written documents and pointless workshops that the majority of the staff does not even need. This is their chance to become the district that had the moral fiber to take an honest look at themselves and, finally, do the right thing.

    • hesaysshesays

      MoralitySeeker – Will you please clarify what you feel it is that Haslett Public Schools had an opportunity to do two years ago but failed to do?

  • MicheleD

    I wrote a letter to the school board members expressing my concern over the jugement shown by superintendent Duda, both regarding this incident and also the Power Point debacle. The school board president responded to me the following “Speaking for myself as the President of the Board of Education, I can tell you that it is my belief that Mike Duda is an outstanding Superintendent and has done an excellent job navigating this difficult situation.”

    If this is truly what he believes, I'm now not only questionning Mr. Duda's judgement but that of the presiding officer of the Haslett School Board. Anyone who starts a petition in this matter, please let us know. I believe you'll get more than a few signatures. I'm just shocked some of these people have jobs…

  • Intelmom

    Yes, we need to change the attitudes and foster an atmosphere of tolerance and respect. Sensitivity training from the top on down is a must.Perhaps then, a discussion about policy change would be most effective. Embracing the community whom they have just insulted and eliminated may be a first step for this District to begin the healing process. Doing nothing hasn't worked…..

  • midMichigan

    With due respect, I'm responding to Hasletite:

    1. Public officials have “backed away” from charges. As I understand it, no one of these officials backed away from proceeding on serious charges except for non-substantive technical reasons — one official recused himself after long delay because he was connected with one of the parties, another official didn't bring action because he was given the case too long after the event. The first official, if my information is correct, seriously considered filing charges of battery.
    It is still a substantive question whether a felony was committed.

    2. Consenting adults. This is a fiction that makes people feel better about what happened — a pox on everyone involved, they were all responsible, no need to use our brains. But consent cannot be given when one is not conscious, and at this point, some people made of another's body a place of public art work. The content of that “art” matters. They didn't say “gotcha” or “you were drunk and passed out.” They drew obscene figures and wrote obscene words on another person's body. That person when awakened became greatly scared. Refusal to address this is indeed “deflection.” Such images are evidence and need to be “read.” This is not “embellishment.” The victim was really victimized.

    The victim has also not claimed to be Mother Teresa and has owned up fully to her own role. But, and this is conveniently omitted from your post, Hasletite, she has also alleged that she was slipped a drug. And a friend of hers repeated the claim at the school board meeting. Again, the story of what happened is more complex than that consenting adults collectively did something stupid but benign.

    3. Duda acted as legal guardian of the Haslett School District's legal interests:
    Perhaps, but the jury is still out on this. To me, it appears he was advised to, or he decided to, think about the range of appropriate response narrowly. Perhaps he thought he was dealing with the personnel issues that flow from this by easing the way out of the district for one of the parties involved. That initiative didn't work. At no point does it appear that he or others, say the HS principal involved, seriously considered whether such behavior raised serious questions about the fitness of the other parties to continue coaching, advising, and so forth.

    4. I am impressed with all the pleas that these are basically good people, good teachers, long contributors, and I do not discount the sincerity of those who provide these pleas. But I am also impressed (depressed?) by all the additional statements that there's an old boys network involved here, friends dealing with friends, rather than professionals dealing with other professionals, professionally.
    Fine with preserving careers and vocations, not my intention to go any other direction, but the school and the district have just not found a way to deal with this effectively, constructively, forthrightly, make of it a moment for serious self-examination, self-criticism, and improvement.

    5. Let's use your imagination, Hasletite. The consequence of all of this was — no consequence. All the parties reassembled as co-workers in the same environment. Counseling? Discussion of what's best for the school? Consideration of all of this in terms of fitness to continue doing extra stuff, like coaching? The history of leave taking, hospitalization, and so forth will no doubt indicate that this non-solution was no solution at all. A situation festered. And then, because it festered, wasn't dealt with, it came out in the form it has been revealed.

    6. Finally, “political agenda.” Why do those who disagree with you get to be labeled as those with a “political agenda.” But your view is without agenda?
    We all want what's best for our children and youths and we all want professionalism and responsibility in those charged with teaching and administering the schools. But, as in the school board meeting, there are differing views of what that might mean….

  • 1995Ford

    O.k. the teachers used bad judgement and will pay for it for many years. Duda and the Haslett schools used bad judgement by covering it up for two years and don't see what they did wrong.
    As someone said earlier.”Two years ago, Haslett Public Schools had an opportunity to do the right thing, but chose to sweep the situation under the rug.” Duda should have come clean then. After this situation along with his big burp in August, I am in disbelief that anyone would want to send their children to school in Haslett.

  • 1995Ford

    O.k. the teachers used bad judgement and will pay for it for many years. Duda and the Haslett schools used bad judgement by covering it up for two years and don't see what they did wrong.
    As someone said earlier.”Two years ago, Haslett Public Schools had an opportunity to do the right thing, but chose to sweep the situation under the rug.” Duda should have come clean then. After this situation along with his big burp in August, I am in disbelief that anyone would want to send their children to school in Haslett.

  • 1995Ford

    O.k. the teachers used bad judgement and will pay for it for many years. Duda and the Haslett schools used bad judgement by covering it up for two years and don't see what they did wrong.
    As someone said earlier.”Two years ago, Haslett Public Schools had an opportunity to do the right thing, but chose to sweep the situation under the rug.” Duda should have come clean then. After this situation along with his big burp in August, I am in disbelief that anyone would want to send their children to school in Haslett.