With the U.S. Supreme Court set to begin a new term on the traditional first Monday in October, one case they will hear this fall involves a prosecutor who was found to have coerced testimony and withheld evidence of a suspect’s innocence, resulting in an innocent man being sent to prison for 25 years.
In that case, Pottawattamie County v McGhee, the prosecutor claims to have absolutely immunity from any civil suit even if it can be proven that he intentionally falsified or withheld evidence in the case. And Michigan Attorney General Mike Cox agrees, having joined 26 other state attorneys general in filing a brief (PDF) in support of that position.
This isn’t just qualified immunity Cox and the other AGs are arguing for. Most public officials have qualified immunity, which means that they can’t be sued personally for actions taken in the course of their public duties unless it can be shown that they willfully violated someone’s “clearly established statutory or constitutional rights.” 90% of the time, qualified immunity is enough to prevent suits against public officials. It’s a fairly high standard to meet.
Nor are they arguing that prosecutors should only be held accountable for wrongful convictions if it can be proven that they proactively and intentionally created false evidence or violated the clear legal and ethical requirements of their position. That would distinguish between wrongful convictions that happen as a result of sincere belief or misinterpretation of the evidence and those that happen as a result of willful misconduct.
But here, they are arguing for absolute immunity, for the idea that no prosecutor could ever be sued under any circumstances even if it can be proven conclusively that they intentionally faked evidence and lied to the court, destroying the life of an innocent person. It seems rather convenient that one group of public officials with prosecutorial power thinks public officials with prosecutorial power should have be allowed to evade responsibility for their own illegal and unjust actions.
Unfortunately, Cox and the other attorneys general are not alone. The Obama administration has also filed a brief in support of absolute immunity.