Top Stories

The Michigan Messenger going forward

By Staff Report | 11.16.11

I am writing today to announce the closure of the Michigan Messenger. After four years of operation in Michigan, the board of the American Independent News Network, has decided to shift publication of its news into a single site, The American Independent at Americanindependent.com. This is part of a shift in strategy, towards new forms [...]

Colorado-based abstinence program provided false and misleading information to Michigan students

HIV-AIDS-small
By Todd A. Heywood | 11.16.11

An abstinence-only presentation provided to numerous school districts in Calhoun and Eaton Counties in October of this year provided false and misleading information to students about HIV, experts allege.

Class action lawsuit filed against MERS over unpaid taxes

foreclosure
By Todd A. Heywood | 11.15.11

Two county registers of deeds filed a class action lawsuit Monday on behalf of Michigan’s 83 counties alleging that the Mortgage Electronic Registration Services owes millions of dollars in property title transfer taxes.

Schuette fights important mercury regulations

epa_logo
By Eartha Jane Melzer | 11.14.11

Despite evidence of the impact of mercury on children and public health, Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette last month joined with 24 other state attorneys general in filing a lawsuit to scuttle new EPA regulations that would reduce mercury emissions from power plants.

Why ‘NEXT Detroit’ might be the next big problem for Kwame

By Minehaha Forman | 08.15.08 | 1:37 pm

I was reading article on Crain’s Detroit Business Web site and I came across a bit about how the NEXT Detroit Neighborhood Initiative is separating from the city and becoming an independent charity.

Not that groundbreaking on the face of it. A lot of city programs spin off into private charities. The Detroit Institute of Arts is one of many.

But knowing what I know about NEXT Detroit and how it operates, I thought: uh oh.Background: the initiative was launched over a year ago as a city program with the mission of revitalizing six long-suffering Detroit neighborhoods over five years. As a government program it brought in $8.9 million from private foundations, the business community, the city, and the state.

But now the city of Detroit is spinning it into a private nonprofit, claiming that doing so will attract more foundation funding.

But there’s one little problem: Who is the board of directors for this now-independent charity? Kilpatrick and other city employees who are being paid by the city still work on the program. And Kilpatrick wrote NEXT Detroit into the city budget, allowing it $25 million annually.

Legally, that’s not how 501(c)(3) (non-profit org) funding works. Sure, cities give money to private nonprofits all the time. But they have to go through the right procedures of donation. They don’t just write them into the budget. So the legalities of this whole spin-off are still unclear.

NEXT is getting all the benefits of a city program: city employees work on it, the mayor basically owns it (and he’s written himself into the contact so he can keep getting paid from it for years), and they advertise in spaces where it’s illegal for private companies to advertise (Hart Plaza, for instance).

So why are they getting away with it? Or, a better question might be, how long before Kilpatrick gets himself into another legal fix.

Comments

  • ShakespearesIdiot

    Well since the $25M was allocated in the city budget prior to the company converting to a 501(c)(3), then I see no reason why it shouldn't be paid, however I wouldn't expect that it would be included in any budget completed after the conversion. But we'll see I guess…

  • Shakespeare'sIdiot

    Well since the $25M was allocated in the city budget prior to the company converting to a 501(c)(3), then I see no reason why it shouldn't be paid, however I wouldn't expect that it would be included in any budget completed after the conversion. But we'll see I guess…

  • Shakespeare'sIdiot

    Well since the $25M was allocated in the city budget prior to the company converting to a 501(c)(3), then I see no reason why it shouldn't be paid, however I wouldn't expect that it would be included in any budget completed after the conversion. But we'll see I guess…