It also appears that Prosecutor Trizinski, apparently without any historical or evidentiary foot to stand on, falled back on smearing the defendent in the courtroom, ignoring her years of history as an ethical and well-respected journalist.

I also find it disturbing that in a county well-known for police ethics issues including media suppression, where we've had to bring in the FBI to investigate and where Bukowski is well-known for her coverage of police malfeasance, the judge made a ridiculous demand on the defense that they had to prove that the officers knew her before suppression of the media could be considered as a motive for the officer's actions.

Perjury is also a crime. Hello Prosecution? Oh yeah, subordination of perjury is also a crime. No one has alleged that the PA suborned this perjury but it was their witness who apparently perjured himself/herself.

Finally, those photos on that camera, if deleted on the scene using the camera's delete functions, are recoverable. If an outside person attempts to “wipe” them to prevent them from being recovered, then that operation is also detectable, and it seems to me the crime of tampering with evidence.

I think that it's time for outside and disinterested experts to get those photos, look at the other evidence, including the shoes that Burkowski wore when the officer claimed she was standing in blood, the crime scene photos that would show her bloody footprints, the police car in which she was transported with her bloody shoes, fingerprints on the tarp that she reportedly lifted to see the dead body, and start examining all of the alleged crimes that may have been committed in this case.

It also appears that Prosecutor Trizinski, apparently without any historical or evidentiary foot to stand on, falled back on smearing the defendent in the courtroom, ignoring her years of history as an ethical and well-respected journalist.

I also find it disturbing that in a county well-known for police ethics issues including media suppression, where we've had to bring in the FBI to investigate and where Bukowski is well-known for her coverage of police malfeasance, the judge made a ridiculous demand on the defense that they had to prove that the officers knew her before suppression of the media could be considered as a motive for the officer's actions.

Perjury is also a crime. Hello Prosecution? Oh yeah, subordination of perjury is also a crime. No one has alleged that the PA suborned this perjury but it was their witness who apparently perjured himself/herself.

Finally, those photos on that camera, if deleted on the scene using the camera's delete functions, are recoverable. If an outside person attempts to “wipe” them to prevent them from being recovered, then that operation is also detectable, and it seems to me the crime of tampering with evidence.

I think that it's time for outside and disinterested experts to get those photos, look at the other evidence, including the shoes that Burkowski wore when the officer claimed she was standing in blood, the crime scene photos that would show her bloody footprints, the police car in which she was transported with her bloody shoes, fingerprints on the tarp that she reportedly lifted to see the dead body, and start examining all of the alleged crimes that may have been committed in this case.

It also appears that Prosecutor Trizinski, apparently without any historical or evidentiary foot to stand on, falled back on smearing the defendent in the courtroom, ignoring her years of history as an ethical and well-respected journalist.

I also find it disturbing that in a county well-known for police ethics issues including media suppression, where we've had to bring in the FBI to investigate and where Bukowski is well-known for her coverage of police malfeasance, the judge made a ridiculous demand on the defense that they had to prove that the officers knew her before suppression of the media could be considered as a motive for the officer's actions.

Perjury is also a crime. Hello Prosecution? Oh yeah, subordination of perjury is also a crime. No one has alleged that the PA suborned this perjury but it was their witness who apparently perjured himself/herself.

Finally, those photos on that camera, if deleted on the scene using the camera's delete functions, are recoverable. If an outside person attempts to “wipe” them to prevent them from being recovered, then that operation is also detectable, and it seems to me the crime of tampering with evidence.

I think that it's time for outside and disinterested experts to get those photos, look at the other evidence, including the shoes that Burkowski wore when the officer claimed she was standing in blood, the crime scene photos that would show her bloody footprints, the police car in which she was transported with her bloody shoes, fingerprints on the tarp that she reportedly lifted to see the dead body, and start examining all of the alleged crimes that may have been committed in this case.