<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Conyers urges Obama not to name Granholm as U.S. Supreme Court pick</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michiganmessenger.com/19257/conyers-urges-obama-not-to-name-granholm-as-us-supreme-court-pick/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michiganmessenger.com/19257/conyers-urges-obama-not-to-name-granholm-as-us-supreme-court-pick</link>
	<description>The Michigan Messenger is a local news site covering politics and policy throughout Michigan.  Its team delivers original reporting daily.  The Michigan Messenger is published by the nonpartisan and nonprofit group American Independent News Network.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 16:19:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Social Bookmarking</title>
		<link>http://michiganmessenger.com/19257/conyers-urges-obama-not-to-name-granholm-as-us-supreme-court-pick/comment-page-1#comment-11917</link>
		<dc:creator>Social Bookmarking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 05:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michiganmessenger.com/?p=19257#comment-11917</guid>
		<description>I heard something about she hates liberals, but I don&#039;t believe Granholm is under any serious consideration. She comes across more as a manegerial type, rather than a scholarly type. What we really need for the Supreme Court is a legal scholar with a massive intellect. Granholm, as bright and competent as she may be, is not that person.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard something about she hates liberals, but I don&#39;t believe Granholm is under any serious consideration. She comes across more as a manegerial type, rather than a scholarly type. What we really need for the Supreme Court is a legal scholar with a massive intellect. Granholm, as bright and competent as she may be, is not that person.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emma732</title>
		<link>http://michiganmessenger.com/19257/conyers-urges-obama-not-to-name-granholm-as-us-supreme-court-pick/comment-page-1#comment-6332</link>
		<dc:creator>Emma732</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 16:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michiganmessenger.com/?p=19257#comment-6332</guid>
		<description>As if Conyers had any credibility on this. He ought to worry about who the US attorneys are considering the stories about his wife and potential bribery scandals. Besides, Granholm has no role in appointing US attorneys, and on top of that, he can&#039;t even remember the name of the attorney he&#039;s so deadset against. even though &quot;everyone in the state&quot; knows this person hasn&#039;t done a good job, he can&#039;t even remember the name?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Didn&#039;t he oppose Granholm on Cobo and on removing Kilpatrick last year too? This sounds more personal than anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As if Conyers had any credibility on this. He ought to worry about who the US attorneys are considering the stories about his wife and potential bribery scandals. Besides, Granholm has no role in appointing US attorneys, and on top of that, he can&#39;t even remember the name of the attorney he&#39;s so deadset against. even though &#8220;everyone in the state&#8221; knows this person hasn&#39;t done a good job, he can&#39;t even remember the name?</p>
<p>Didn&#39;t he oppose Granholm on Cobo and on removing Kilpatrick last year too? This sounds more personal than anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

