Comments on: R & B star wins in Michigan court http://michiganmessenger.com/14373/r-b-star-wins-in-michigan-court The Michigan Messenger is a local news site covering politics and policy throughout Michigan. Its team delivers original reporting daily. The Michigan Messenger is published by the nonpartisan and nonprofit group American Independent News Network. Fri, 30 Sep 2011 16:19:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1 By: ProducersLive http://michiganmessenger.com/14373/r-b-star-wins-in-michigan-court/comment-page-1#comment-17373 ProducersLive Mon, 31 Aug 2009 05:02:03 +0000 http://michiganmessenger.com/?p=14373#comment-17373 This is crazy!<br><br><a href="http://www.producerslive.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.producerslive.com</a> This is crazy!

http://www.producerslive.com

]]> By: ProducersLive http://michiganmessenger.com/14373/r-b-star-wins-in-michigan-court/comment-page-1#comment-12006 ProducersLive Mon, 31 Aug 2009 01:02:03 +0000 http://michiganmessenger.com/?p=14373#comment-12006 This is crazy!<br><br><a href="http://www.producerslive.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.producerslive.com</a> This is crazy!

http://www.producerslive.com

]]> By: JOLT Digest » Jones v. Blige | Harvard Journal of Law & Technology http://michiganmessenger.com/14373/r-b-star-wins-in-michigan-court/comment-page-1#comment-4928 JOLT Digest » Jones v. Blige | Harvard Journal of Law & Technology Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:40:20 +0000 http://michiganmessenger.com/?p=14373#comment-4928 [...] The Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court’s decision, holding that the songs were not substantially similar and that the Plaintiffs had not provided sufficient evidence to establish Defendants’ access to their work under the “corporate receipt” doctrine. Exclusive Rights offers commentary, focusing on the distinction made in this case between the corporate receipt doctrine and “bare corporate receipt.” The Michigan Messenger briefly summarized the opinion here. [...] [...] The Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court’s decision, holding that the songs were not substantially similar and that the Plaintiffs had not provided sufficient evidence to establish Defendants’ access to their work under the “corporate receipt” doctrine. Exclusive Rights offers commentary, focusing on the distinction made in this case between the corporate receipt doctrine and “bare corporate receipt.” The Michigan Messenger briefly summarized the opinion here. [...]

]]>