I am writing today to announce the closure of the Michigan Messenger. After four years of operation in Michigan, the board of the American Independent News Network, has decided to shift publication of its news into a single site, The American Independent at Americanindependent.com. This is part of a shift in strategy, towards new forms [...]
An abstinence-only presentation provided to numerous school districts in Calhoun and Eaton Counties in October of this year provided false and misleading information to students about HIV, experts allege.
Two county registers of deeds filed a class action lawsuit Monday on behalf of Michigan’s 83 counties alleging that the Mortgage Electronic Registration Services owes millions of dollars in property title transfer taxes.
Despite evidence of the impact of mercury on children and public health, Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette last month joined with 24 other state attorneys general in filing a lawsuit to scuttle new EPA regulations that would reduce mercury emissions from power plants.
Activists put GOP on defensive with jujitsu move that uses “family values” to floor McCain on Iraq issue
MoveOn.org debuted a political television ad Wednesday it says is testing better with preview audiences than any ad the progressive nonprofit has ever made.
The ad uses a young mother and her cooing baby to attack John McCain for his infamous remark about how the United States might be in Iraq for 100 years.
The defiant, heart-string-pulling spot, titled “Not Alex,” is airing nationally on CNN and MSNBC for a week. It’s the first major salvo of independently financed attack ads to appear in the general campaign. MoveOn and its partner in the ad, the labor union AFSCME, made additional buys here in Michigan and in the battleground states Ohio and Wisconsin.
Continued -McCain has since explained that in making his comment, he was talking not about active warfare but about a noncombative presence such as the U.S. military has currently in Germany, Japan and South Korea.
A presence well planned for, since the Bush administration has already spent an unknown number of tax dollars building permanent bases in Iraq, even as Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama is calling for full or near-full withdrawal from the country within the first six months of 2009.
MoveOn.org, a political action committee that supported Obama in the primary season, defends the ad’s use of the “100 years” remark with documentation of three recent quotes where the presumed Republican nominee asserted that war with radical Islamists might last for the remainder of the century.
One is below:
While speaking at a town hall meeting in Sun City Center, Fla., McCain said, “I’d like to look you in the eye and tell you there’s not gonna be any more wars. I’d like to look you in the eyes and tell you that this terrible evil called radical Islamic extremism is defeated. I can’t do that. I’ve got to tell you that we’re gonna be in this struggle for the rest of this century because it’s a transcendent evil.” [Town hall meeting; Sun City Center, Fla., 01/26/08; emphasis added]
Though the ad names Iraq specifically, it also hints at the larger GOP platform of continued military aggression in the Middle East. McCain has echoed George Bush in saber-rattling with Iran, for instance.
Beyond raising awareness about the more hawkish agenda of McCain, the ad by its very existence also makes a vivid commentary on the Iraq War itself.
It would never fly – would have never tested well in focus groups – if the creators had made it in 1944 and substituted the name “Franklin Roosevelt” for “John McCain” and switched out the word “Iraq” with the phrase “the wars against Germany and imperial Japan.”
The mere existence of this ad illustrates the dearth of any overriding sense among the public that the war is being waged as a matter of national defense, or that its stakes involve our survival as a nation. Mothers, the ad suggests intentionally or not, are not willing to give up their children for a war that is about anything less. And that includes any protracted conflict against Muslim extremism or effort at empire-building that might necessitate today’s babes in arms becoming 2025′s men at arms.
For its part, the Republican National Committee responded to the ad this way, as cited in the Chicago Tribune:
The Republican National Committee, taking questions about the ad referred by the McCain campaign, said the country needs a president who listens to commanders, not partisan groups like MoveOn.org, according to The Associated Press. “Bringing peace and security to Iraq will require a commander in chief who won’t allow partisanship to cloud his judgment,” said RNC spokesman Alex Conant.
The ad was also discussed on Wednesday’s “Hannity and Colmes” show on Fox News with guest George Will, who admitted that the ad put McCain on the defensive.
In an email blast sent out to its 3.3 million members, MoveOn.org included some details about how well the ad was received in tests conducted by the strategic consulting firm Greenberg, Quinlan, and Rosner, whose other clients include the Chicago Cubs and the AARP:
Yet the Navy ads play every so often…. Our very own government relies on those toddler’s to grow big, strong, smart, healthy, and heterosexual. How else are they supposed to attack the “enemy”
Isn’t somewhat unamerican not to be handing your first born to go fight the war on terror if they are physically, emotionally, and willing to be able to do so?
the53rdcalypso
Take William I think everyone is missing the point. Everyone except this mother in an identical situation: http://www.236.com/n…
Maybe you can’t have Alex, but you can take William Mr. McCain.
Minehaha Forman
Army for $ As Rayne said, so many young men in poverty ridden or just low-income families turn to the military because they think it’s the only way out. Recruiters swarm low income areas for just that reason. So if William and Alex have $$$ then they may have more choices if there’s no draft.
Frankster
Yet the Navy ads play every so often…. Our very own government relies on those toddler's to grow big, strong, smart, healthy, and heterosexual. How else are they supposed to attack the “enemy”
Isn't somewhat unamerican not to be handing your first born to go fight the war on terror if they are physically, emotionally, and willing to be able to do so?
LoRayne Apo-Joynt
Fundamental question of liberty Why should any of us “breeders” have kids if we're merely raising them to become cannon fodder? where is our fundamental right to “life, liberty and pursuit of happiness” if we can only expect another 100 years chained to Iraq?
Why should my kids, who were merely children when the Iraq War launched, expect to sign on to supporting this occupation as adults, or provide their children and their grandchildren to this effort?
Somebody has to draw the line on this debacle. It starts here with mothers like me and Alex's mom.
the53rdcalypso
Take William I think everyone is missing the point. Everyone except this mother in an identical situation: http://www.236.com/n…
Maybe you can't have Alex, but you can take William Mr. McCain.
LoRayne Apo-Joynt
Oh, we didn't miss the point William represents TODAY'S all-volunteer military, where a large percentage of the troops are there because they haven't been wanted by a thriving (hah!) economy.
Alex is the draft we haven't had and probably would need to have if we were to give in to McCain's hundred-years-of-occupation model.
In either case, our children, grandchildren and great grandchildren shouldn't be so disposable at some old man's whim.
Minehaha Forman
Army for $ As Rayne said, so many young men in poverty ridden or just low-income families turn to the military because they think it's the only way out. Recruiters swarm low income areas for just that reason. So if William and Alex have $$$ then they may have more choices if there's no draft.
LoRayne Apo-Joynt
Fundamental question of liberty Why should any of us “breeders” have kids if we’re merely raising them to become cannon fodder? where is our fundamental right to “life, liberty and pursuit of happiness” if we can only expect another 100 years chained to Iraq?
Why should my kids, who were merely children when the Iraq War launched, expect to sign on to supporting this occupation as adults, or provide their children and their grandchildren to this effort?
Somebody has to draw the line on this debacle. It starts here with mothers like me and Alex’s mom.
LoRayne Apo-Joynt
Oh, we didn’t miss the point William represents TODAY’S all-volunteer military, where a large percentage of the troops are there because they haven’t been wanted by a thriving (hah!) economy.
Alex is the draft we haven’t had and probably would need to have if we were to give in to McCain’s hundred-years-of-occupation model.
In either case, our children, grandchildren and great grandchildren shouldn’t be so disposable at some old man’s whim.