Southfield attorney Geoffrey Fieger is back in the courtroom and in the limelight — though this time as the defendant in a criminal federal prosecution. Since his trial for alleged illegal campaign contributions kicked off, the wily former candidate for governor and his star attorney, Gerry Spence, have managed to turn more than one prosecution witness into an inadvertent ally for the defense.
Following is a brief look at the proceedings thus far.
But first, a quick summary: Fieger and his partner Vernon Johnson were indicted in August for allegedly recruiting friends, family, employees and vendors to contribute $127,000 to John Edwards’ 2004 presidential campaign, then reimbursing them for their donations.
The indictments came after a federal investigation, which followed an earlier state investigation by Republican State Attorney General Mike Cox that had run aground. The federal investigation began in 2005 when 70 FBI agents raided Fieger’s law office and interviewed 32 of his employees, descending on their homes at night — a highly unusual level of intensity for a campaign funding investigation.
Continued -Here’s a look at the last week in Fiegerland:
Jeffrey Danzig, an attorney from Fieger’s law office who is a prosecution witness, told jurors Wednesday that funneling campaign donations through employees by asking them to contribute and then reimbursing them was commonplace in his 18 years at the high-profile (though now defunct) Lopatin-Miller law firm. “I’ve done exactly what I’ve done at the Fieger firm that’s the subject of this litigation on numerous occasions through my legal career at another firm,” Danzig said. The number of such cases was “too many to count.” Assistant U.S. Attorney Lynn Helland tried unsuccessfully to cut off the answer.
Danzig also belittled Eric Humphrey, a key prosecution witness and ex-Michigan State Police lieutenant who went to the FBI in April 2005, about six months after the firm canned him as its information technology chief. Humphrey is suing Fieger; Danzig referred to him on the stand as “a big talker.”
On Tuesday, Todd Weglarz, another lawyer at Fieger’s firm, testified regarding a memo he wrote to Fieger in 2000 saying he feared the firm’s election fund-raising might cost him his law license. But once on the stand, Weglarz, who has immunity in the case, testified that his concerns were later dispelled after discussing the matter with another partner in the firm.
Tuesday wasn’t all good for Fieger: The U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals in Cincinnati upheld a lower court decision to throw out Fieger’s complaint about a state probe into his funding of an ad campaign against state Supreme Court Justice Stephen Markman in 2004. The judges said Fieger’s legal team must pay for Markman’s attorney fees because the complaint was frivolous.
On Monday, Weglarz testified that FBI agents surprised him in his driveway, terrifying his children, and tried to trick him.